Theorem carsgval 31565

Description: Value of the Caratheodory sigma-Algebra construction function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
carsgval.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑉)
carsgval.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝒫 𝑂⟶(0[,]+∞))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
carsgval	⊢ (𝜑 → (toCaraSiga‘𝑀) = {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑀,𝑎,𝑒   𝑂,𝑎,𝑒   𝜑,𝑎,𝑒

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑒,𝑎)

Proof of Theorem carsgval

Dummy variable 𝑚 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-carsg 31564	. 2 ⊢ toCaraSiga = (𝑚 ∈ V ↦ {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑚 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑚((𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑚‘𝑒)})
2		simpr 487	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → 𝑚 = 𝑀)
3	2	dmeqd 5777	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → dom 𝑚 = dom 𝑀)
4		carsgval.2	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝒫 𝑂⟶(0[,]+∞))
5	4	fdmd 6526	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑀 = 𝒫 𝑂)
6	5	adantr 483	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → dom 𝑀 = 𝒫 𝑂)
7	3, 6	eqtrd 2859	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → dom 𝑚 = 𝒫 𝑂)
8	7	unieqd 4855	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → ∪ dom 𝑚 = ∪ 𝒫 𝑂)
9		unipw 5346	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∪ 𝒫 𝑂 = 𝑂
10	8, 9	syl6eq 2875	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → ∪ dom 𝑚 = 𝑂)
11	10	pweqd 4561	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑚 = 𝒫 𝑂)
12		fveq1 6672	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) = (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)))
13		fveq1 6672	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎)) = (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎)))
14	12, 13	oveq12d 7177	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ((𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = ((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))))
15		fveq1 6672	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (𝑚‘𝑒) = (𝑀‘𝑒))
16	14, 15	eqeq12d 2840	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (((𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑚‘𝑒) ↔ ((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)))
17	16	adantl 484	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → (((𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑚‘𝑒) ↔ ((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)))
18	11, 17	raleqbidv 3404	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → (∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑚((𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑚‘𝑒) ↔ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)))
19	11, 18	rabeqbidv 3488	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑚 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑚((𝑚‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑚‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑚‘𝑒)} = {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)})
20		carsgval.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑉)
21	20	pwexd 5283	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝒫 𝑂 ∈ V)
22		fex 6992	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀:𝒫 𝑂⟶(0[,]+∞) ∧ 𝒫 𝑂 ∈ V) → 𝑀 ∈ V)
23	4, 21, 22	syl2anc 586	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ V)
24		pwexg 5282	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝒫 𝑂 ∈ V)
25		rabexg 5237	. . 3 ⊢ (𝒫 𝑂 ∈ V → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)} ∈ V)
26	20, 24, 25	3syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)} ∈ V)
27	1, 19, 23, 26	fvmptd2 6779	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (toCaraSiga‘𝑀) = {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑂((𝑀‘(𝑒 ∩ 𝑎)) +𝑒 (𝑀‘(𝑒 ∖ 𝑎))) = (𝑀‘𝑒)})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1536   ∈ wcel 2113  ∀wral 3141  {crab 3145  Vcvv 3497   ∖ cdif 3936   ∩ cin 3938  𝒫 cpw 4542  ∪ cuni 4841  dom cdm 5558  ⟶wf 6354  ‘cfv 6358  (class class class)co 7159  0cc0 10540  +∞cpnf 10675   +_𝑒 cxad 12508  [,]cicc 12744  toCaraSigaccarsg 31563

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2014  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2796  ax-rep 5193  ax-sep 5206  ax-nul 5213  ax-pow 5269  ax-pr 5333

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1539  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2621  df-eu 2653  df-clab 2803  df-cleq 2817  df-clel 2896  df-nfc 2966  df-ne 3020  df-ral 3146  df-rex 3147  df-reu 3148  df-rab 3150  df-v 3499  df-sbc 3776  df-csb 3887  df-dif 3942  df-un 3944  df-in 3946  df-ss 3955  df-nul 4295  df-if 4471  df-pw 4544  df-sn 4571  df-pr 4573  df-op 4577  df-uni 4842  df-iun 4924  df-br 5070  df-opab 5132  df-mpt 5150  df-id 5463  df-xp 5564  df-rel 5565  df-cnv 5566  df-co 5567  df-dm 5568  df-rn 5569  df-res 5570  df-ima 5571  df-iota 6317  df-fun 6360  df-fn 6361  df-f 6362  df-f1 6363  df-fo 6364  df-f1o 6365  df-fv 6366  df-ov 7162  df-carsg 31564

This theorem is referenced by:  carsgcl  31566  elcarsg  31567