| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ceqsalg.1 | ⊢ (ψ → ∀xψ) |
| ceqsalg.2 | ⊢ (x = A → (φ ↔ ψ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ceqsalg | ⊢ (A ∈ B → (∀x(x = A → φ) ↔ ψ)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ceqsalg.2 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (x = A → (φ ↔ ψ)) | |
| 2 | 1 | biimpd 153 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (x = A → (φ → ψ)) |
| 3 | 2 | a2i 9 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((x = A → φ) → (x = A → ψ)) |
| 4 | 3 | 19.20i 991 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∀x(x = A → φ) → ∀x(x = A → ψ)) |
| 5 | ceqsalg.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (ψ → ∀xψ) | |
| 6 | 5 | 19.23 1062 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∀x(x = A → ψ) ↔ (∃x x = A → ψ)) |
| 7 | 4, 6 | sylib 198 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀x(x = A → φ) → (∃x x = A → ψ)) |
| 8 | elex 1816 | . . 3 ⊢ (A ∈ B → ∃x x = A) | |
| 9 | 7, 8 | syl5com 52 | . 2 ⊢ (A ∈ B → (∀x(x = A → φ) → ψ)) |
| 10 | 1 | biimprcd 156 | . . 3 ⊢ (ψ → (x = A → φ)) |
| 11 | 5, 10 | 19.21ai 997 | . 2 ⊢ (ψ → ∀x(x = A → φ)) |
| 12 | 9, 11 | impbid1 516 | 1 ⊢ (A ∈ B → (∀x(x = A → φ) ↔ ψ)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 3 ↔ wb 146 ∀wal 953 = wceq 955 ∈ wcel 957 ∃wex 979 |
| This theorem is referenced by: ceqsal 1823 sbc6g 1952 sucprcreg 4583 spwpr2 8615 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 ax-gen 962 ax-12 967 ax-17 970 ax-4 972 ax-5o 974 ax-6o 977 ax-9o 1122 ax-ext 1458 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 df-an 225 df-ex 980 df-sb 1171 df-clab 1463 df-cleq 1468 df-clel 1471 df-v 1809 |