Theorem ceqsalg 3530

Description: A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. For an alternate proof, see ceqsalgALT 3531. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 29-Sep-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ceqsalg.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
ceqsalg.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsalg	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsalg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ceqsalg.1	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
2		ceqsalg.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3	2	ax-gen 1792	. 2 ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
4		ceqsalt 3528	. 2 ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
5	1, 3, 4	mp3an12 1447	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208  ∀wal 1531   = wceq 1533  Ⅎwnf 1780   ∈ wcel 2110

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2793

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-3an 1085  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsal  3532  clel2g  3652  uniiunlem  4061  ralrnmpo  7283  fimaxre3  11581  pmapglbx  36899