Theorem ceqsrexv 3647

Description: Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexv	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsrexv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rex 3142	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
2		an12 643	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
3	2	exbii 1842	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
4	1, 3	bitr4i 280	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
5		eleq1 2898	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
6		ceqsrexv.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
7	5, 6	anbi12d 632	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
8	7	ceqsexgv 3645	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)))
9	8	bianabs 544	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ 𝜓))
10	4, 9	syl5bb 285	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1531  ∃wex 1774   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃wrex 3137

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2791

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-ex 1775  df-cleq 2812  df-clel 2891  df-rex 3142

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsrexbv  3648  ceqsrex2v  3649  reuxfrd  3737  f1oiso  7096  creur  11624  creui  11625  deg1ldg  24678  ulm2  24965  iscgra1  26588  reuxfrdf  30247  poimirlem24  34908  eqlkr3  36229  diclspsn  38322  rmxdiophlem  39603  expdiophlem1  39609  expdiophlem2  39610