Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  ceqsrexv Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem ceqsrexv 3367
 Description: Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
ceqsrexv.1 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))
Assertion
Ref Expression
ceqsrexv (𝐴𝐵 → (∃𝑥𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜓,𝑥
Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsrexv
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-rex 2947 . . 3 (∃𝑥𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑)))
2 an12 855 . . . 4 ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑)))
32exbii 1814 . . 3 (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑)))
41, 3bitr4i 267 . 2 (∃𝑥𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)))
5 eleq1 2718 . . . . 5 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥𝐵𝐴𝐵))
6 ceqsrexv.1 . . . . 5 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))
75, 6anbi12d 747 . . . 4 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥𝐵𝜑) ↔ (𝐴𝐵𝜓)))
87ceqsexgv 3366 . . 3 (𝐴𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴𝐵𝜓)))
98bianabs 942 . 2 (𝐴𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)) ↔ 𝜓))
104, 9syl5bb 272 1 (𝐴𝐵 → (∃𝑥𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 383   = wceq 1523  ∃wex 1744   ∈ wcel 2030  ∃wrex 2942 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1762  ax-4 1777  ax-5 1879  ax-6 1945  ax-7 1981  ax-9 2039  ax-10 2059  ax-12 2087  ax-ext 2631 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1526  df-ex 1745  df-nf 1750  df-sb 1938  df-clab 2638  df-cleq 2644  df-clel 2647  df-rex 2947  df-v 3233 This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsrexbv  3368  ceqsrex2v  3369  reuxfr2d  4921  f1oiso  6641  creur  11052  creui  11053  deg1ldg  23897  ulm2  24184  iscgra1  25747  reuxfr3d  29456  poimirlem24  33563  eqlkr3  34706  diclspsn  36800  rmxdiophlem  37899  expdiophlem1  37905  expdiophlem2  37906
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator