Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > comfeqval | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Equality of two compositions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
comfeqval.b | ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) |
comfeqval.h | ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) |
comfeqval.1 | ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) |
comfeqval.2 | ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐷) |
comfeqval.3 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) |
comfeqval.4 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷)) |
comfeqval.x | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) |
comfeqval.y | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) |
comfeqval.z | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) |
comfeqval.f | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) |
comfeqval.g | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
comfeqval | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 ∙ 𝑍)𝐹)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | comfeqval.4 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷)) | |
2 | 1 | oveqd 7162 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉(compf‘𝐶)𝑍) = (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉(compf‘𝐷)𝑍)) |
3 | 2 | oveqd 7162 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉(compf‘𝐶)𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉(compf‘𝐷)𝑍)𝐹)) |
4 | eqid 2818 | . . 3 ⊢ (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐶) | |
5 | comfeqval.b | . . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) | |
6 | comfeqval.h | . . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) | |
7 | comfeqval.1 | . . 3 ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) | |
8 | comfeqval.x | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) | |
9 | comfeqval.y | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) | |
10 | comfeqval.z | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) | |
11 | comfeqval.f | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) | |
12 | comfeqval.g | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍)) | |
13 | 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 | comfval 16958 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉(compf‘𝐶)𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)𝐹)) |
14 | eqid 2818 | . . 3 ⊢ (compf‘𝐷) = (compf‘𝐷) | |
15 | eqid 2818 | . . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐷) = (Base‘𝐷) | |
16 | eqid 2818 | . . 3 ⊢ (Hom ‘𝐷) = (Hom ‘𝐷) | |
17 | comfeqval.2 | . . 3 ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐷) | |
18 | comfeqval.3 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) | |
19 | 18 | homfeqbas 16954 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐶) = (Base‘𝐷)) |
20 | 5, 19 | syl5eq 2865 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)) |
21 | 8, 20 | eleqtrd 2912 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐷)) |
22 | 9, 20 | eleqtrd 2912 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐷)) |
23 | 10, 20 | eleqtrd 2912 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (Base‘𝐷)) |
24 | 5, 6, 16, 18, 8, 9 | homfeqval 16955 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐷)𝑌)) |
25 | 11, 24 | eleqtrd 2912 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐷)𝑌)) |
26 | 5, 6, 16, 18, 9, 10 | homfeqval 16955 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌𝐻𝑍) = (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐷)𝑍)) |
27 | 12, 26 | eleqtrd 2912 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐷)𝑍)) |
28 | 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 25, 27 | comfval 16958 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉(compf‘𝐷)𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 ∙ 𝑍)𝐹)) |
29 | 3, 13, 28 | 3eqtr3d 2861 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 ∙ 𝑍)𝐹)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 = wceq 1528 ∈ wcel 2105 〈cop 4563 ‘cfv 6348 (class class class)co 7145 Basecbs 16471 Hom chom 16564 compcco 16565 Homf chomf 16925 compfccomf 16926 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1787 ax-4 1801 ax-5 1902 ax-6 1961 ax-7 2006 ax-8 2107 ax-9 2115 ax-10 2136 ax-11 2151 ax-12 2167 ax-ext 2790 ax-rep 5181 ax-sep 5194 ax-nul 5201 ax-pow 5257 ax-pr 5320 ax-un 7450 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 208 df-an 397 df-or 842 df-3an 1081 df-tru 1531 df-ex 1772 df-nf 1776 df-sb 2061 df-mo 2615 df-eu 2647 df-clab 2797 df-cleq 2811 df-clel 2890 df-nfc 2960 df-ne 3014 df-ral 3140 df-rex 3141 df-reu 3142 df-rab 3144 df-v 3494 df-sbc 3770 df-csb 3881 df-dif 3936 df-un 3938 df-in 3940 df-ss 3949 df-nul 4289 df-if 4464 df-pw 4537 df-sn 4558 df-pr 4560 df-op 4564 df-uni 4831 df-iun 4912 df-br 5058 df-opab 5120 df-mpt 5138 df-id 5453 df-xp 5554 df-rel 5555 df-cnv 5556 df-co 5557 df-dm 5558 df-rn 5559 df-res 5560 df-ima 5561 df-iota 6307 df-fun 6350 df-fn 6351 df-f 6352 df-f1 6353 df-fo 6354 df-f1o 6355 df-fv 6356 df-ov 7148 df-oprab 7149 df-mpo 7150 df-1st 7678 df-2nd 7679 df-homf 16929 df-comf 16930 |
This theorem is referenced by: catpropd 16967 cidpropd 16968 oppccomfpropd 16985 monpropd 16995 funcpropd 17158 natpropd 17234 fucpropd 17235 xpcpropd 17446 hofpropd 17505 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |