Theorem con5VD 39633

Description: Virtual deduction proof of con5 39228. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. con5 39228 is con5VD 39633 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from con5VD 39633.

1::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   )
2:1:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓 )   )
4::	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜓)
5:3,4:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)   )
qed:5:	⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
con5VD	⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem con5VD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idn1 39290	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   )
2		biimpr 210	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑))
3	1, 2	e1a 39352	. . . 4 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)   )
4		con3 149	. . . 4 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑) → (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓))
5	3, 4	e1a 39352	. . 3 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓)   )
6		notnotb 304	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜓)
7		imbi2 337	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜓) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓)))
8	7	biimprcd 240	. . 3 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓) → ((𝜓 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)))
9	5, 6, 8	e10 39419	. 2 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)   )
10	9	in1 39287	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-vd1 39286

This theorem is referenced by: (None)