Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > dffr2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Alternate definition of well-founded relation. Similar to Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
dffr2 | ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-fr 5513 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)) | |
2 | rabeq0 4337 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) | |
3 | 2 | rexbii 3247 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) |
4 | 3 | imbi2i 338 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅) ↔ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)) |
5 | 4 | albii 1816 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)) |
6 | 1, 5 | bitr4i 280 | 1 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 {𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑧𝑅𝑦} = ∅)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 208 ∧ wa 398 ∀wal 1531 = wceq 1533 ≠ wne 3016 ∀wral 3138 ∃wrex 3139 {crab 3142 ⊆ wss 3935 ∅c0 4290 class class class wbr 5065 Fr wfr 5510 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1792 ax-4 1806 ax-5 1907 ax-6 1966 ax-7 2011 ax-8 2112 ax-9 2120 ax-10 2141 ax-11 2157 ax-12 2173 ax-ext 2793 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 399 df-or 844 df-tru 1536 df-ex 1777 df-nf 1781 df-sb 2066 df-clab 2800 df-cleq 2814 df-clel 2893 df-nfc 2963 df-ral 3143 df-rex 3144 df-rab 3147 df-dif 3938 df-nul 4291 df-fr 5513 |
This theorem is referenced by: fr0 5533 dfepfr 5539 dffr3 5961 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |