Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  dftpos3 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem dftpos3 7415
 Description: Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. Compare df-cnv 5151. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
dftpos3 (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧})
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐹

Proof of Theorem dftpos3
Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 relcnv 5538 . . . . . . . . . 10 Rel dom 𝐹
2 dmtpos 7409 . . . . . . . . . . 11 (Rel dom 𝐹 → dom tpos 𝐹 = dom 𝐹)
32releqd 5237 . . . . . . . . . 10 (Rel dom 𝐹 → (Rel dom tpos 𝐹 ↔ Rel dom 𝐹))
41, 3mpbiri 248 . . . . . . . . 9 (Rel dom 𝐹 → Rel dom tpos 𝐹)
5 reltpos 7402 . . . . . . . . 9 Rel tpos 𝐹
64, 5jctil 559 . . . . . . . 8 (Rel dom 𝐹 → (Rel tpos 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom tpos 𝐹))
7 relrelss 5697 . . . . . . . 8 ((Rel tpos 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom tpos 𝐹) ↔ tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((V × V) × V))
86, 7sylib 208 . . . . . . 7 (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((V × V) × V))
98sseld 3635 . . . . . 6 (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V)))
10 elvvv 5212 . . . . . 6 (𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩)
119, 10syl6ib 241 . . . . 5 (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 → ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩))
1211pm4.71rd 668 . . . 4 (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹)))
13 19.41vvv 1919 . . . . 5 (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹))
14 eleq1 2718 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹))
15 df-br 4686 . . . . . . . . 9 (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹)
16 vex 3234 . . . . . . . . . 10 𝑧 ∈ V
17 brtpos 7406 . . . . . . . . . 10 (𝑧 ∈ V → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧))
1816, 17ax-mp 5 . . . . . . . . 9 (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧)
1915, 18bitr3i 266 . . . . . . . 8 (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧)
2014, 19syl6bb 276 . . . . . . 7 (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧))
2120pm5.32i 670 . . . . . 6 ((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧))
22213exbii 1816 . . . . 5 (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧))
2313, 22bitr3i 266 . . . 4 ((∃𝑥𝑦𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧))
2412, 23syl6bb 276 . . 3 (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧)))
2524abbi2dv 2771 . 2 (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧)})
26 df-oprab 6694 . 2 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧)}
2725, 26syl6eqr 2703 1 (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥𝐹𝑧})
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 383   = wceq 1523  ∃wex 1744   ∈ wcel 2030  {cab 2637  Vcvv 3231   ⊆ wss 3607  ⟨cop 4216   class class class wbr 4685   × cxp 5141  ◡ccnv 5142  dom cdm 5143  Rel wrel 5148  {coprab 6691  tpos ctpos 7396 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1762  ax-4 1777  ax-5 1879  ax-6 1945  ax-7 1981  ax-8 2032  ax-9 2039  ax-10 2059  ax-11 2074  ax-12 2087  ax-13 2282  ax-ext 2631  ax-sep 4814  ax-nul 4822  ax-pow 4873  ax-pr 4936  ax-un 6991 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1056  df-tru 1526  df-ex 1745  df-nf 1750  df-sb 1938  df-eu 2502  df-mo 2503  df-clab 2638  df-cleq 2644  df-clel 2647  df-nfc 2782  df-ne 2824  df-ral 2946  df-rex 2947  df-rab 2950  df-v 3233  df-sbc 3469  df-dif 3610  df-un 3612  df-in 3614  df-ss 3621  df-nul 3949  df-if 4120  df-pw 4193  df-sn 4211  df-pr 4213  df-op 4217  df-uni 4469  df-br 4686  df-opab 4746  df-mpt 4763  df-id 5053  df-xp 5149  df-rel 5150  df-cnv 5151  df-co 5152  df-dm 5153  df-rn 5154  df-res 5155  df-ima 5156  df-iota 5889  df-fun 5928  df-fn 5929  df-fv 5934  df-oprab 6694  df-tpos 7397 This theorem is referenced by:  tposoprab  7433
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator