Theorem dmecd 35554

Description: Equality of the coset of 𝐵 and the coset of 𝐶 implies equivalence of domain elementhood (equivalence is not necessary as opposed to ereldm 8329). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Oct-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dmecd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑅 = 𝐴)
dmecd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐵]𝑅 = [𝐶]𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dmecd	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem dmecd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dmecd.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐵]𝑅 = [𝐶]𝑅)
2	1	neeq1d 3073	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐵]𝑅 ≠ ∅ ↔ [𝐶]𝑅 ≠ ∅))
3		ecdmn0 8328	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↔ [𝐵]𝑅 ≠ ∅)
4		ecdmn0 8328	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↔ [𝐶]𝑅 ≠ ∅)
5	2, 3, 4	3bitr4g 316	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ dom 𝑅))
6		dmecd.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑅 = 𝐴)
7	6	eleq2d 2896	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
8	6	eleq2d 2896	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴))
9	5, 7, 8	3bitr3d 311	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   = wceq 1531   ∈ wcel 2108   ≠ wne 3014  ∅c0 4289  dom cdm 5548  [cec 8279

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2170  ax-ext 2791  ax-sep 5194  ax-nul 5201  ax-pr 5320

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1084  df-tru 1534  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2064  df-mo 2616  df-eu 2648  df-clab 2798  df-cleq 2812  df-clel 2891  df-nfc 2961  df-ne 3015  df-ral 3141  df-rex 3142  df-rab 3145  df-v 3495  df-sbc 3771  df-dif 3937  df-un 3939  df-in 3941  df-ss 3950  df-nul 4290  df-if 4466  df-sn 4560  df-pr 4562  df-op 4566  df-br 5058  df-opab 5120  df-xp 5554  df-cnv 5556  df-dm 5558  df-rn 5559  df-res 5560  df-ima 5561  df-ec 8283

This theorem is referenced by:  dmec2d  35555