Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > elimf | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Eliminate a mapping hypothesis for the weak deduction theorem dedth 4519, when a special case 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 is provable, in order to convert 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 from a hypothesis to an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2006.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elimf.1 | ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elimf | ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | feq1 6488 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐹 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
2 | feq1 6488 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐺 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
3 | elimf.1 | . 2 ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 | |
4 | 1, 2, 3 | elimhyp 4526 | 1 ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ifcif 4463 ⟶wf 6344 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1787 ax-4 1801 ax-5 1902 ax-6 1961 ax-7 2006 ax-8 2107 ax-9 2115 ax-10 2136 ax-11 2151 ax-12 2167 ax-ext 2790 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 208 df-an 397 df-or 842 df-3an 1081 df-tru 1531 df-ex 1772 df-nf 1776 df-sb 2061 df-clab 2797 df-cleq 2811 df-clel 2890 df-nfc 2960 df-rab 3144 df-v 3494 df-dif 3936 df-un 3938 df-in 3940 df-ss 3949 df-nul 4289 df-if 4464 df-sn 4558 df-pr 4560 df-op 4564 df-br 5058 df-opab 5120 df-rel 5555 df-cnv 5556 df-co 5557 df-dm 5558 df-rn 5559 df-fun 6350 df-fn 6351 df-f 6352 |
This theorem is referenced by: hosubcl 29477 hoaddcom 29478 hoaddass 29486 hocsubdir 29489 hoaddid1 29495 hodid 29496 ho0sub 29501 honegsub 29503 hoddi 29694 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |