Theorem equsalv 2267

Description: An equivalence related to implicit substitution. Version of equsal 2438 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2389. See equsalvw 2009 for a version with two disjoint variable conditions requiring fewer axioms. See also the dual form equsexv 2268. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
equsalv.nf	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
equsalv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
equsalv	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem equsalv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equsalv.nf	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
2	1	19.23 2210	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜓))
3		equsalv.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
4	3	pm5.74i 273	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜓))
5	4	albii 1819	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜓))
6		ax6ev 1971	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
7	6	a1bi 365	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜓))
8	2, 5, 7	3bitr4i 305	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208  ∀wal 1534  ∃wex 1779  Ⅎwnf 1783

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2014  ax-12 2176

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784

This theorem is referenced by:  equsalhw  2298  sbiev  2329  sb6rfv  2375  nfabdw  3003  bj-equsalhv  34132