| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Introduce a conjunct in the scope of an existential quantifier. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| exintr | ⊢ (∀x(φ → ψ) → (∃xφ → ∃x(φ ⋀ ψ))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | hba1 1002 | . 2 ⊢ (∀x(φ → ψ) → ∀x∀x(φ → ψ)) | |
| 2 | ancl 294 | . . 3 ⊢ ((φ → ψ) → (φ → (φ ⋀ ψ))) | |
| 3 | 2 | a4s 983 | . 2 ⊢ (∀x(φ → ψ) → (φ → (φ ⋀ ψ))) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | 19.22d 1061 | 1 ⊢ (∀x(φ → ψ) → (∃xφ → ∃x(φ ⋀ ψ))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 3 ⋀ wa 223 ∀wal 953 ∃wex 979 |
| This theorem is referenced by: ceqsex 1831 r19.2z 2344 pwpw0 2466 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 ax-gen 962 ax-4 972 ax-5o 974 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 df-an 225 df-ex 980 |