Theorem fvelrnbf 41265

Description: A version of fvelrnb 6719 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fvelrnbf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
fvelrnbf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
fvelrnbf.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fvelrnbf	⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem fvelrnbf

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvelrnb 6719	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵))
2		nfcv 2975	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3		fvelrnbf.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4		fvelrnbf.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
5		nfcv 2975	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑦
6	4, 5	nffv 6673	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑦)
7		fvelrnbf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
8	6, 7	nfeq 2989	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵
9		nfv 1909	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵
10		fveqeq2 6672	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵))
11	2, 3, 8, 9, 10	cbvrexfw 3437	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵)
12	1, 11	syl6bb 289	1 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   = wceq 1531   ∈ wcel 2108  Ⅎwnfc 2959  ∃wrex 3137  ran crn 5549   Fn wfn 6343  ‘cfv 6348

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2170  ax-ext 2791  ax-sep 5194  ax-nul 5201  ax-pr 5320

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1084  df-tru 1534  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2064  df-mo 2616  df-eu 2648  df-clab 2798  df-cleq 2812  df-clel 2891  df-nfc 2961  df-ral 3141  df-rex 3142  df-rab 3145  df-v 3495  df-sbc 3771  df-dif 3937  df-un 3939  df-in 3941  df-ss 3950  df-nul 4290  df-if 4466  df-sn 4560  df-pr 4562  df-op 4566  df-uni 4831  df-br 5058  df-opab 5120  df-mpt 5138  df-id 5453  df-xp 5554  df-rel 5555  df-cnv 5556  df-co 5557  df-dm 5558  df-rn 5559  df-iota 6307  df-fun 6350  df-fn 6351  df-fv 6356

This theorem is referenced by:  refsumcn  41277  stoweidlem29  42304