Theorem gsumval1 17892

Description: Value of the group sum operation when every element being summed is an identity of 𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
gsumval1.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
gsumval1.z	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)
gsumval1.p	⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)
gsumval1.o	⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑦 + 𝑥) = 𝑦)}
gsumval1.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
gsumval1.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊)
gsumval1.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑂)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
gsumval1	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = 0 )

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑥, + ,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐺(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑂(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑊(𝑥,𝑦)   0 (𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem gsumval1

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑚 𝑛 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		gsumval1.b	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		gsumval1.z	. . 3 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)
3		gsumval1.p	. . 3 ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)
4		gsumval1.o	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑦 + 𝑥) = 𝑦)}
5		eqidd 2822	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)) = (◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)))
6		gsumval1.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
7		gsumval1.a	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊)
8		gsumval1.f	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑂)
9	4	ssrab3 4056	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑂 ⊆ 𝐵
10		fss 6526	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑂 ∧ 𝑂 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
11	8, 9, 10	sylancl 588	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
12	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11	gsumval 17886	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = if(ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂, 0 , if(𝐴 ∈ ran ..., (℩𝑧∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)(𝐴 = (𝑚...𝑛) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq𝑚( + , 𝐹)‘𝑛))), (℩𝑧∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂))))–1-1-onto→(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq1( + , (𝐹 ∘ 𝑓))‘(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)))))))))
13		frn 6519	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑂 → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂)
14		iftrue 4472	. . 3 ⊢ (ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂 → if(ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂, 0 , if(𝐴 ∈ ran ..., (℩𝑧∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)(𝐴 = (𝑚...𝑛) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq𝑚( + , 𝐹)‘𝑛))), (℩𝑧∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂))))–1-1-onto→(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq1( + , (𝐹 ∘ 𝑓))‘(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)))))))) = 0 )
15	8, 13, 14	3syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → if(ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂, 0 , if(𝐴 ∈ ran ..., (℩𝑧∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)(𝐴 = (𝑚...𝑛) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq𝑚( + , 𝐹)‘𝑛))), (℩𝑧∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂))))–1-1-onto→(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq1( + , (𝐹 ∘ 𝑓))‘(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)))))))) = 0 )
16	12, 15	eqtrd 2856	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = 0 )

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1533  ∃wex 1776   ∈ wcel 2110  ∀wral 3138  ∃wrex 3139  {crab 3142  Vcvv 3494   ∖ cdif 3932   ⊆ wss 3935  ifcif 4466  ^◡ccnv 5553  ran crn 5555   “ cima 5557   ∘ ccom 5558  ℩cio 6311  ⟶wf 6350  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6353  ‘cfv 6354  (class class class)co 7155  1c1 10537  ℤ_≥cuz 12242  ...cfz 12891  seqcseq 13368  ♯chash 13689  Basecbs 16482  +_gcplusg 16564  0_gc0g 16712   Σ_g cgsu 16713

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2793  ax-sep 5202  ax-nul 5209  ax-pow 5265  ax-pr 5329  ax-un 7460

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2618  df-eu 2650  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-sbc 3772  df-csb 3883  df-dif 3938  df-un 3940  df-in 3942  df-ss 3951  df-nul 4291  df-if 4467  df-pw 4540  df-sn 4567  df-pr 4569  df-op 4573  df-uni 4838  df-br 5066  df-opab 5128  df-mpt 5146  df-id 5459  df-xp 5560  df-rel 5561  df-cnv 5562  df-co 5563  df-dm 5564  df-rn 5565  df-res 5566  df-ima 5567  df-pred 6147  df-iota 6313  df-fun 6356  df-fn 6357  df-f 6358  df-f1 6359  df-fo 6360  df-f1o 6361  df-fv 6362  df-ov 7158  df-oprab 7159  df-mpo 7160  df-wrecs 7946  df-recs 8007  df-rdg 8045  df-seq 13369  df-gsum 16715

This theorem is referenced by:  gsum0  17893  gsumval2  17895  gsumz  17999