Theorem idinxpssinxp 35568

Description: Two ways to say that intersections with Cartesian products are in a subclass relation, special case of inxpss2 35566. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Mar-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
idinxpssinxp	⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦

Proof of Theorem idinxpssinxp

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		inxpss2 35566	. 2 ⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 I 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
2		ideqg 5716	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ V → (𝑥 I 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
3	2	elv 3499	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 I 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
4	3	imbi1i 352	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 I 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
5	4	2ralbii 3166	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 I 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
6	1, 5	bitri 277	1 ⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208  ∀wral 3138  Vcvv 3494   ∩ cin 3934   ⊆ wss 3935   class class class wbr 5058   I cid 5453   × cxp 5547

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2793  ax-sep 5195  ax-nul 5202  ax-pr 5321

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2618  df-eu 2650  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-dif 3938  df-un 3940  df-in 3942  df-ss 3951  df-nul 4291  df-if 4467  df-sn 4561  df-pr 4563  df-op 4567  df-br 5059  df-opab 5121  df-id 5454  df-xp 5555  df-rel 5556

This theorem is referenced by:  idinxpssinxp4  35571