Theorem idlsubcl 35303

Description: An ideal is closed under subtraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
idlsubcl.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
idlsubcl.2	⊢ 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
idlsubcl	⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)

Proof of Theorem idlsubcl

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idlsubcl.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
2		eqid 2823	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran 𝐺 = ran 𝐺
3	1, 2	idlcl 35297	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺)
4	1, 2	idlcl 35297	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺)
5	3, 4	anim12dan 620	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺))
6		eqid 2823	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (inv‘𝐺) = (inv‘𝐺)
7		idlsubcl.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)
8	1, 2, 6, 7	rngosub 35210	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)))
9	8	3expb 1116	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)))
10	9	adantlr 713	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)))
11	5, 10	syldan 593	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)))
12		simprl 769	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼)
13	1, 6	idlnegcl 35302	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)
14	13	adantrl 714	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)
15	12, 14	jca 514	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐼))
16	1	idladdcl 35299	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)) ∈ 𝐼)
17	15, 16	syldan 593	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)) ∈ 𝐼)
18	11, 17	eqeltrd 2915	1 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  ran crn 5558  ‘cfv 6357  (class class class)co 7158  1^st c1st 7689  invcgn 28270   /_𝑔 cgs 28271  RingOpscrngo 35174  Idlcidl 35287

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795  ax-rep 5192  ax-sep 5205  ax-nul 5212  ax-pow 5268  ax-pr 5332  ax-un 7463

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-ne 3019  df-ral 3145  df-rex 3146  df-reu 3147  df-rmo 3148  df-rab 3149  df-v 3498  df-sbc 3775  df-csb 3886  df-dif 3941  df-un 3943  df-in 3945  df-ss 3954  df-nul 4294  df-if 4470  df-pw 4543  df-sn 4570  df-pr 4572  df-op 4576  df-uni 4841  df-iun 4923  df-br 5069  df-opab 5131  df-mpt 5149  df-id 5462  df-xp 5563  df-rel 5564  df-cnv 5565  df-co 5566  df-dm 5567  df-rn 5568  df-res 5569  df-ima 5570  df-iota 6316  df-fun 6359  df-fn 6360  df-f 6361  df-f1 6362  df-fo 6363  df-f1o 6364  df-fv 6365  df-riota 7116  df-ov 7161  df-oprab 7162  df-mpo 7163  df-1st 7691  df-2nd 7692  df-grpo 28272  df-gid 28273  df-ginv 28274  df-gdiv 28275  df-ablo 28324  df-ass 35123  df-exid 35125  df-mgmOLD 35129  df-sgrOLD 35141  df-mndo 35147  df-rngo 35175  df-idl 35290

This theorem is referenced by: (None)