Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  inab Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem inab 3887
 Description: Intersection of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
inab ({𝑥𝜑} ∩ {𝑥𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem inab
Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 sban 2397 . . 3 ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2 df-clab 2607 . . 3 (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑𝜓))
3 df-clab 2607 . . . 4 (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
4 df-clab 2607 . . . 4 (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
53, 4anbi12i 732 . . 3 ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓}) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
61, 2, 53bitr4ri 293 . 2 ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)})
76ineqri 3798 1 ({𝑥𝜑} ∩ {𝑥𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)}
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1481  [wsb 1878   ∈ wcel 1988  {cab 2606   ∩ cin 3566 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1720  ax-4 1735  ax-5 1837  ax-6 1886  ax-7 1933  ax-9 1997  ax-10 2017  ax-11 2032  ax-12 2045  ax-13 2244  ax-ext 2600 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1484  df-ex 1703  df-nf 1708  df-sb 1879  df-clab 2607  df-cleq 2613  df-clel 2616  df-nfc 2751  df-v 3197  df-in 3574 This theorem is referenced by:  inrab  3891  inrab2  3892  dfrab3  3894  orduniss2  7018  ssenen  8119  hashf1lem2  13223  ballotlem2  30524  dfiota3  32005  bj-inrab  32898  ptrest  33379  diophin  37155
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator