Theorem inxpssidinxp 35575

Description: Two ways to say that intersections with Cartesian products are in a subclass relation, special case of inxpss2 35574. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Jul-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inxpssidinxp	⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦

Proof of Theorem inxpssidinxp

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		inxpss2 35574	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 I 𝑦))
2		ideqg 5724	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ V → (𝑥 I 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
3	2	elv 3501	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 I 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
4	3	imbi2i 338	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 I 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
5	4	2ralbii 3168	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 I 𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
6	1, 5	bitri 277	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208  ∀wral 3140  Vcvv 3496   ∩ cin 3937   ⊆ wss 3938   class class class wbr 5068   I cid 5461   × cxp 5555

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795  ax-sep 5205  ax-nul 5212  ax-pr 5332

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-ral 3145  df-rex 3146  df-rab 3149  df-v 3498  df-dif 3941  df-un 3943  df-in 3945  df-ss 3954  df-nul 4294  df-if 4470  df-sn 4570  df-pr 4572  df-op 4576  df-br 5069  df-opab 5131  df-id 5462  df-xp 5563  df-rel 5564

This theorem is referenced by:  dfcnvrefrels3  35769  dfcnvrefrel3  35771