Theorem isf32lem1 9777

Description: Lemma for isfin3-2 9791. Derive weak ordering property. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isf32lem.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐺)
isf32lem.b	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))
isf32lem.c	⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isf32lem1	⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐹

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐺(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem isf32lem1

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq2 6672	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐵 → (𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘𝐵))
2	1	sseq1d 4000	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐵 → ((𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐹‘𝐵) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
3	2	imbi2d 343	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐵 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))))
4		fveq2 6672	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑏 → (𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘𝑏))
5	4	sseq1d 4000	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑏 → ((𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
6	5	imbi2d 343	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑏 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))))
7		fveq2 6672	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = suc 𝑏 → (𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘suc 𝑏))
8	7	sseq1d 4000	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = suc 𝑏 → ((𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
9	8	imbi2d 343	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = suc 𝑏 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))))
10		fveq2 6672	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
11	10	sseq1d 4000	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ((𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
12	11	imbi2d 343	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))))
13		ssid 3991	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐵) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)
14	13	2a1i 12	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
15		isf32lem.b	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))
16		suceq 6258	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑏 → suc 𝑥 = suc 𝑏)
17	16	fveq2d 6676	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑏 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) = (𝐹‘suc 𝑏))
18		fveq2 6672	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑏 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑏))
19	17, 18	sseq12d 4002	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑏 → ((𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑏)))
20	19	rspcv 3620	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑏 ∈ ω → (∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥) → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑏)))
21	15, 20	syl5 34	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑏 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑏)))
22	21	ad2antrr 724	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑏 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑏) → (𝜑 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑏)))
23		sstr2 3976	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑏) → ((𝐹‘𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵) → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
24	22, 23	syl6 35	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑏 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑏) → (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵) → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))))
25	24	a2d 29	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑏 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑏) → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) → (𝜑 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))))
26	3, 6, 9, 12, 14, 25	findsg 7611	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
27	26	impr 457	1 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  ∀wral 3140   ⊆ wss 3938  𝒫 cpw 4541  ∩ cint 4878  ran crn 5558  suc csuc 6195  ⟶wf 6353  ‘cfv 6357  ωcom 7582

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795  ax-sep 5205  ax-nul 5212  ax-pr 5332  ax-un 7463

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3or 1084  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-ne 3019  df-ral 3145  df-rex 3146  df-rab 3149  df-v 3498  df-sbc 3775  df-dif 3941  df-un 3943  df-in 3945  df-ss 3954  df-pss 3956  df-nul 4294  df-if 4470  df-pw 4543  df-sn 4570  df-pr 4572  df-tp 4574  df-op 4576  df-uni 4841  df-br 5069  df-opab 5131  df-tr 5175  df-eprel 5467  df-po 5476  df-so 5477  df-fr 5516  df-we 5518  df-ord 6196  df-on 6197  df-lim 6198  df-suc 6199  df-iota 6316  df-fv 6365  df-om 7583

This theorem is referenced by:  isf32lem2  9778  isf32lem3  9779