Theorem linindslinci 44502

Description: The implications of being a linearly independent subset and a linear combination of this subset being 0. (Contributed by AV, 24-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jul-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
islininds.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)
islininds.z	⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀)
islininds.r	⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀)
islininds.e	⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅)
islininds.0	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
linindslinci	⊢ ((𝑆 linIndS 𝑀 ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 )

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑀   𝑥,𝑆   𝑥,𝐹

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥)   𝑅(𝑥)   𝐸(𝑥)   0 (𝑥)   𝑍(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem linindslinci

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		islininds.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)
2		islininds.z	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀)
3		islininds.r	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀)
4		islininds.e	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅)
5		islininds.0	. . . 4 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	linindsi 44501	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 linIndS 𝑀 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆)((𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 )))
7		breq1 5068	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓 finSupp 0 ↔ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ))
8		oveq1 7162	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆))
9	8	eqeq1d 2823	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍 ↔ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍))
10	7, 9	anbi12d 632	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) ↔ (𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍)))
11		fveq1 6668	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
12	11	eqeq1d 2823	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ))
13	12	ralbidv 3197	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ))
14	10, 13	imbi12d 347	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (((𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ) ↔ ((𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 )))
15	14	rspcv 3617	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) → (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆)((𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ) → ((𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 )))
16	15	com23 86	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) → ((𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆)((𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 )))
17	16	3impib 1112	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆)((𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ))
18	17	com12 32	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆)((𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ) → ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ))
19	6, 18	simpl2im 506	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 linIndS 𝑀 → ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ))
20	19	imp 409	1 ⊢ ((𝑆 linIndS 𝑀 ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 )

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   ∧ w3a 1083   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2110  ∀wral 3138  𝒫 cpw 4538   class class class wbr 5065  ‘cfv 6354  (class class class)co 7155   ↑_m cmap 8405   finSupp cfsupp 8832  Basecbs 16482  Scalarcsca 16567  0_gc0g 16712   linC clinc 44458   linIndS clininds 44494

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2793  ax-sep 5202  ax-nul 5209  ax-pr 5329

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2618  df-eu 2650  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-dif 3938  df-un 3940  df-in 3942  df-ss 3951  df-nul 4291  df-if 4467  df-pw 4540  df-sn 4567  df-pr 4569  df-op 4573  df-uni 4838  df-br 5066  df-opab 5128  df-xp 5560  df-rel 5561  df-iota 6313  df-fv 6362  df-ov 7158  df-lininds 44496

This theorem is referenced by: (None)