Theorem meetval 17623

Description: Meet value. Since both sides evaluate to ∅ when they don't exist, for convenience we drop the {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 requirement. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
meetdef.u	⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)
meetdef.m	⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
meetdef.k	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
meetdef.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊)
meetdef.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑍)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
meetval	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))

Proof of Theorem meetval

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		meetdef.k	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
2		meetdef.u	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)
3		meetdef.m	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
4	2, 3	meetfval2 17620	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 → ∧ = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))})
5	1, 4	syl 17	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∧ = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))})
6	5	oveqd 7167	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝑋{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}𝑌))
7	6	adantr 483	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝑋{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}𝑌))
8		simpr 487	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺)
9		eqidd 2822	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
10		meetdef.x	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊)
11		meetdef.y	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑍)
12		fvexd 6679	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) ∈ V)
13		preq12 4664	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → {𝑥, 𝑦} = {𝑋, 𝑌})
14	13	eleq1d 2897	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ↔ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺))
15	14	3adant3 1128	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ↔ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺))
16		simp3 1134	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
17	13	fveq2d 6668	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
18	17	3adant3 1128	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
19	16, 18	eqeq12d 2837	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → (𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}) ↔ (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})))
20	15, 19	anbi12d 632	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → (({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦})) ↔ ({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))))
21		moeq 3697	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∃*𝑧 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦})
22	21	moani 2633	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∃*𝑧({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))
23		eqid 2821	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}
24	20, 22, 23	ovigg 7289	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) ∈ V) → (({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → (𝑋{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})))
25	10, 11, 12, 24	syl3anc 1367	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → (𝑋{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})))
26	25	adantr 483	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → (𝑋{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})))
27	8, 9, 26	mp2and 697	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝑋{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
28	7, 27	eqtrd 2856	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
29	2, 3, 1, 10, 11	meetdef 17622	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ ↔ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺))
30	29	notbid 320	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ ↔ ¬ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺))
31		df-ov 7153	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = ( ∧ ‘⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩)
32		ndmfv 6694	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ → ( ∧ ‘⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩) = ∅)
33	31, 32	syl5eq 2868	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = ∅)
34	30, 33	syl6bir 256	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = ∅))
35	34	imp 409	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = ∅)
36		ndmfv 6694	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 → (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = ∅)
37	36	adantl 484	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = ∅)
38	35, 37	eqtr4d 2859	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
39	28, 38	pm2.61dan 811	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   ∧ w3a 1083   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2110  Vcvv 3494  ∅c0 4290  {cpr 4562  ⟨cop 4566  dom cdm 5549  ‘cfv 6349  (class class class)co 7150  {coprab 7151  glbcglb 17547  meetcmee 17549

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2793  ax-rep 5182  ax-sep 5195  ax-nul 5202  ax-pow 5258  ax-pr 5321  ax-un 7455

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2618  df-eu 2650  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-reu 3145  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-sbc 3772  df-csb 3883  df-dif 3938  df-un 3940  df-in 3942  df-ss 3951  df-nul 4291  df-if 4467  df-pw 4540  df-sn 4561  df-pr 4563  df-op 4567  df-uni 4832  df-iun 4913  df-br 5059  df-opab 5121  df-mpt 5139  df-id 5454  df-xp 5555  df-rel 5556  df-cnv 5557  df-co 5558  df-dm 5559  df-rn 5560  df-res 5561  df-ima 5562  df-iota 6308  df-fun 6351  df-fn 6352  df-f 6353  df-f1 6354  df-fo 6355  df-f1o 6356  df-fv 6357  df-riota 7108  df-ov 7153  df-oprab 7154  df-glb 17579  df-meet 17581

This theorem is referenced by:  meetcl  17624  meetval2  17627  meetcomALT  17635  pmapmeet  36903  diameetN  38186  dihmeetlem2N  38429  dihmeetcN  38432  dihmeet  38473