Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 178 of 449) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28623) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28624-30146) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30147-44804) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | latj4 17701 | Rearrangement of lattice join of 4 classes. (chj4 29240 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑍 ∨ 𝑊)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑍) ∨ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑊))) | ||
Theorem | latj4rot 17702 | Rotate lattice join of 4 classes. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑍 ∨ 𝑊)) = ((𝑊 ∨ 𝑋) ∨ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑍))) | ||
Theorem | latjjdi 17703 | Lattice join distributes over itself. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑍))) | ||
Theorem | latjjdir 17704 | Lattice join distributes over itself. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑍) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑍) ∨ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑍))) | ||
Theorem | mod1ile 17705 | The weak direction of the modular law (e.g., pmod1i 36866, atmod1i1 36875) that holds in any lattice. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) ≤ ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍))) | ||
Theorem | mod2ile 17706 | The weak direction of the modular law (e.g., pmod2iN 36867) that holds in any lattice. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑍 ≤ 𝑋 → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑍) ≤ (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑍)))) | ||
Syntax | ccla 17707 | Extend class notation with complete lattices. |
class CLat | ||
Definition | df-clat 17708 | Define the class of all complete lattices, where every subset of the base set has an LUB and a GLB. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2012.) (Revised by NM, 12-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ CLat = {𝑝 ∈ Poset ∣ (dom (lub‘𝑝) = 𝒫 (Base‘𝑝) ∧ dom (glb‘𝑝) = 𝒫 (Base‘𝑝))} | ||
Theorem | isclat 17709 | The predicate "is a complete lattice." (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2012.) (Revised by NM, 12-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (dom 𝑈 = 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ dom 𝐺 = 𝒫 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | clatpos 17710 | A complete lattice is a poset. (Contributed by NM, 8-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CLat → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) | ||
Theorem | clatlem 17711 | Lemma for properties of a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → ((𝑈‘𝑆) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑆) ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | clatlubcl 17712 | Any subset of the base set has an LUB in a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑈‘𝑆) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | clatlubcl2 17713 | Any subset of the base set has an LUB in a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | clatglbcl 17714 | Any subset of the base set has a GLB in a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑆) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | clatglbcl2 17715 | Any subset of the base set has a GLB in a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝐺) | ||
Theorem | clatl 17716 | A complete lattice is a lattice. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) TODO: use eqrelrdv2 5662 to shorten proof and eliminate joindmss 17607 and meetdmss 17621? |
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CLat → 𝐾 ∈ Lat) | ||
Theorem | isglbd 17717* | Properties that determine the greatest lower bound of a complete lattice. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Mar-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐻 ≤ 𝑦) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ CLat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑆) = 𝐻) | ||
Theorem | lublem 17718* | Lemma for the least upper bound properties in a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ (𝑈‘𝑆) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (𝑈‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | lubub 17719 | The LUB of a complete lattice subset is an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑋 ≤ (𝑈‘𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | lubl 17720* | The LUB of a complete lattice subset is the least bound. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋 → (𝑈‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | lubss 17721 | Subset law for least upper bounds. (chsupss 29047 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑇) → (𝑈‘𝑆) ≤ (𝑈‘𝑇)) | ||
Theorem | lubel 17722 | An element of a set is less than or equal to the least upper bound of the set. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑋 ≤ (𝑈‘𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | lubun 17723 | The LUB of a union. (Contributed by NM, 5-Mar-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑈‘(𝑆 ∪ 𝑇)) = ((𝑈‘𝑆) ∨ (𝑈‘𝑇))) | ||
Theorem | clatglb 17724* | Properties of greatest lower bound of a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐺‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑆)))) | ||
Theorem | clatglble 17725 | The greatest lower bound is the least element. (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐺‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | clatleglb 17726* | Two ways of expressing "less than or equal to the greatest lower bound." (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑆) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑋 ≤ 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | clatglbss 17727 | Subset law for greatest lower bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑇) → (𝐺‘𝑇) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑆)) | ||
Syntax | codu 17728 | Class function defining dual orders. |
class ODual | ||
Definition | df-odu 17729 |
Define the dual of an ordered structure, which replaces the order
component of the structure with its reverse. See odubas 17733, oduleval 17731,
and oduleg 17732 for its principal properties.
EDITORIAL: likely usable to simplify many lattice proofs, as it allows for duality arguments to be formalized; for instance latmass 17788. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ODual = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 sSet 〈(le‘ndx), ◡(le‘𝑤)〉)) | ||
Theorem | oduval 17730 | Value of an order dual structure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑂 sSet 〈(le‘ndx), ◡ ≤ 〉) | ||
Theorem | oduleval 17731 | Value of the less-equal relation in an order dual structure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ ◡ ≤ = (le‘𝐷) | ||
Theorem | oduleg 17732 | Truth of the less-equal relation in an order dual structure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑂) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (le‘𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴𝐺𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | odubas 17733 | Base set of an order dual structure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) | ||
Theorem | pospropd 17734* | Posethood is determined only by structure components and only by the value of the relation within the base set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(le‘𝐾)𝑦 ↔ 𝑥(le‘𝐿)𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ Poset ↔ 𝐿 ∈ Poset)) | ||
Theorem | odupos 17735 | Being a poset is a self-dual property. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ Poset → 𝐷 ∈ Poset) | ||
Theorem | oduposb 17736 | Being a poset is a self-dual property. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑂 ∈ Poset ↔ 𝐷 ∈ Poset)) | ||
Theorem | meet0 17737 | Lemma for odujoin 17742. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) TODO (df-riota 7103 update): This proof increased from 152 bytes to 547 bytes after the df-riota 7103 change. Any way to shorten it? join0 17738 also. |
⊢ (meet‘∅) = ∅ | ||
Theorem | join0 17738 | Lemma for odumeet 17740. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (join‘∅) = ∅ | ||
Theorem | oduglb 17739 | Greatest lower bounds in a dual order are least upper bounds in the original order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑈 = (glb‘𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | odumeet 17740 | Meets in a dual order are joins in the original. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ ∨ = (meet‘𝐷) | ||
Theorem | odulub 17741 | Least upper bounds in a dual order are greatest lower bounds in the original order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (glb‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐿 = (lub‘𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | odujoin 17742 | Joins in a dual order are meets in the original. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ ∧ = (join‘𝐷) | ||
Theorem | odulatb 17743 | Being a lattice is self-dual. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑂 ∈ Lat ↔ 𝐷 ∈ Lat)) | ||
Theorem | oduclatb 17744 | Being a complete lattice is self-dual. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ CLat ↔ 𝐷 ∈ CLat) | ||
Theorem | odulat 17745 | Being a lattice is self-dual. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ Lat → 𝐷 ∈ Lat) | ||
Theorem | poslubmo 17746* | Least upper bounds in a poset are unique if they exist. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | posglbmo 17747* | Greatest lower bounds in a poset are unique if they exist. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | poslubd 17748* | Properties which determine the least upper bound in a poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑇) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → 𝑇 ≤ 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈‘𝑆) = 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | poslubdg 17749* | Properties which determine the least upper bound in a poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑇) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → 𝑇 ≤ 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈‘𝑆) = 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | posglbd 17750* | Properties which determine the greatest lower bound in a poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑇 ≤ 𝑥) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → 𝑦 ≤ 𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑆) = 𝑇) | ||
Syntax | cipo 17751 | Class function defining inclusion posets. |
class toInc | ||
Definition | df-ipo 17752* |
For any family of sets, define the poset of that family ordered by
inclusion. See ipobas 17755, ipolerval 17756, and ipole 17758 for its contract.
EDITORIAL: I'm not thrilled with the name. Any suggestions? (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ toInc = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ ⦋{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)} / 𝑜⦌({〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑓〉, 〈(TopSet‘ndx), (ordTop‘𝑜)〉} ∪ {〈(le‘ndx), 𝑜〉, 〈(oc‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑓 ↦ ∪ {𝑦 ∈ 𝑓 ∣ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅})〉})) | ||
Theorem | ipostr 17753 | The structure of df-ipo 17752 is a structure defining indices up to 11. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Oct-2015.) |
⊢ ({〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐵〉, 〈(TopSet‘ndx), 𝐽〉} ∪ {〈(le‘ndx), ≤ 〉, 〈(oc‘ndx), ⊥ 〉}) Struct 〈1, ;11〉 | ||
Theorem | ipoval 17754* | Value of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ ≤ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐼 = ({〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐹〉, 〈(TopSet‘ndx), (ordTop‘ ≤ )〉} ∪ {〈(le‘ndx), ≤ 〉, 〈(oc‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ↦ ∪ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅})〉})) | ||
Theorem | ipobas 17755 | Base set of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Oct-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹 = (Base‘𝐼)) | ||
Theorem | ipolerval 17756* | Relation of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)} = (le‘𝐼)) | ||
Theorem | ipotset 17757 | Topology of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Oct-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (ordTop‘ ≤ ) = (TopSet‘𝐼)) | ||
Theorem | ipole 17758 | Weak order condition of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | ipolt 17759 | Strict order condition of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 ⊊ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | ipopos 17760 | The inclusion poset on a family of sets is actually a poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐼 ∈ Poset | ||
Theorem | isipodrs 17761* | Condition for a family of sets to be directed by inclusion. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((toInc‘𝐴) ∈ Dirset ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑧)) | ||
Theorem | ipodrscl 17762 | Direction by inclusion as used here implies sethood. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((toInc‘𝐴) ∈ Dirset → 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | ipodrsfi 17763* | Finite upper bound property for directed collections of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (((toInc‘𝐴) ∈ Dirset ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑧) | ||
Theorem | fpwipodrs 17764 | The finite subsets of any set are directed by inclusion. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (toInc‘(𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin)) ∈ Dirset) | ||
Theorem | ipodrsima 17765* | The monotone image of a directed set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝑢) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑣)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (toInc‘𝐵) ∈ Dirset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (toInc‘(𝐹 “ 𝐵)) ∈ Dirset) | ||
Theorem | isacs3lem 17766* | An algebraic closure system satisfies isacs3 17774. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | acsdrsel 17767 | An algebraic closure system contains all directed unions of closed sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (toInc‘𝑌) ∈ Dirset) → ∪ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | isacs4lem 17768* | In a closure system in which directed unions of closed sets are closed, closure commutes with directed unions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶)) → (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑋((toInc‘𝑡) ∈ Dirset → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑡) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑡)))) | ||
Theorem | isacs5lem 17769* | If closure commutes with directed unions, then the closure of a set is the closure of its finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑋((toInc‘𝑡) ∈ Dirset → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑡) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑡))) → (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝐹‘𝑠) = ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)))) | ||
Theorem | acsdrscl 17770 | In an algebraic closure system, closure commutes with directed unions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋 ∧ (toInc‘𝑌) ∈ Dirset) → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑌) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | acsficl 17771 | A closure in an algebraic closure system is the union of the closures of finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝑆) = ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin))) | ||
Theorem | isacs5 17772* | A closure system is algebraic iff the closure of a generating set is the union of the closures of its finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝐹‘𝑠) = ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)))) | ||
Theorem | isacs4 17773* | A closure system is algebraic iff closure commutes with directed unions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑋((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑠) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑠)))) | ||
Theorem | isacs3 17774* | A closure system is algebraic iff directed unions of closed sets are closed. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | acsficld 17775 | In an algebraic closure system, the closure of a set is the union of the closures of its finite subsets. Deduction form of acsficl 17771. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = ∪ (𝑁 “ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin))) | ||
Theorem | acsficl2d 17776* | In an algebraic closure system, an element is in the closure of a set if and only if it is in the closure of a finite subset. Alternate form of acsficl 17771. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | acsfiindd 17777 | In an algebraic closure system, a set is independent if and only if all its finite subsets are independent. Part of Proposition 4.1.3 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 83. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin) ⊆ 𝐼)) | ||
Theorem | acsmapd 17778* | In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑇 is contained in the closure of 𝑆, there is a map 𝑓 from 𝑇 into the set of finite subsets of 𝑆 such that the closure of ∪ ran 𝑓 contains 𝑇. This is proven by applying acsficl2d 17776 to each element of 𝑇. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑆)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑇⟶(𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑁‘∪ ran 𝑓))) | ||
Theorem | acsmap2d 17779* | In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure and 𝑆 is independent, then there is a map 𝑓 from 𝑇 into the set of finite subsets of 𝑆 such that 𝑆 equals the union of ran 𝑓. This is proven by taking the map 𝑓 from acsmapd 17778 and observing that, since 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure, the closure of ∪ ran 𝑓 must contain 𝑆. Since 𝑆 is independent, by mrissmrcd 16901, ∪ ran 𝑓 must equal 𝑆. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑇⟶(𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝑆 = ∪ ran 𝑓)) | ||
Theorem | acsinfd 17780 | In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure and 𝑆 is infinite independent, then 𝑇 is infinite. This follows from applying unirnffid 8805 to the map given in acsmap2d 17779. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑇 ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | acsdomd 17781 | In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure and 𝑆 is infinite independent, then 𝑇 dominates 𝑆. This follows from applying acsinfd 17780 and then applying unirnfdomd 9978 to the map given in acsmap2d 17779. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≼ 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | acsinfdimd 17782 | In an algebraic closure system, if two independent sets have equal closure and one is infinite, then they are equinumerous. This is proven by using acsdomd 17781 twice with acsinfd 17780. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | acsexdimd 17783* | In an algebraic closure system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if two independent sets have equal closure, they are equinumerous. See mreexfidimd 16911 for the finite case and acsinfdimd 17782 for the infinite case. This is a special case of Theorem 4.2.2 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 87. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | mrelatglb 17784 | Greatest lower bounds in a Moore space are realized by intersections. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ ∅) → (𝐺‘𝑈) = ∩ 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | mrelatglb0 17785 | The empty intersection in a Moore space is realized by the base set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (𝐺‘∅) = 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | mrelatlub 17786 | Least upper bounds in a Moore space are realized by the closure of the union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (lub‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐿‘𝑈) = (𝐹‘∪ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | mreclatBAD 17787* | A Moore space is a complete lattice under inclusion. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) TODO (df-riota 7103 update): Reprove using isclat 17709 instead of the isclatBAD. hypothesis. See commented-out mreclat above. |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ CLat ↔ (𝐼 ∈ Poset ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ (Base‘𝐼) → (((lub‘𝐼)‘𝑥) ∈ (Base‘𝐼) ∧ ((glb‘𝐼)‘𝑥) ∈ (Base‘𝐼))))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐼 ∈ CLat) | ||
Theorem | latmass 17788 | Lattice meet is associative. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍))) | ||
Theorem | latdisdlem 17789* | Lemma for latdisd 17790. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Lat → (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑢 ∨ (𝑣 ∧ 𝑤)) = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑢 ∨ 𝑤)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∧ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 ∧ 𝑦) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑧)))) | ||
Theorem | latdisd 17790* | In a lattice, joins distribute over meets if and only if meets distribute over joins; the distributive property is self-dual. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Lat → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑧)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∧ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 ∧ 𝑦) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑧)))) | ||
Syntax | cdlat 17791 | The class of distributive lattices. |
class DLat | ||
Definition | df-dlat 17792* | A distributive lattice is a lattice in which meets distribute over joins, or equivalently (latdisd 17790) joins distribute over meets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ DLat = {𝑘 ∈ Lat ∣ [(Base‘𝑘) / 𝑏][(join‘𝑘) / 𝑗][(meet‘𝑘) / 𝑚]∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥𝑚(𝑦𝑗𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝑚𝑦)𝑗(𝑥𝑚𝑧))} | ||
Theorem | isdlat 17793* | Property of being a distributive lattice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∧ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 ∧ 𝑦) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑧)))) | ||
Theorem | dlatmjdi 17794 | In a distributive lattice, meets distribute over joins. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ DLat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍))) | ||
Theorem | dlatl 17795 | A distributive lattice is a lattice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DLat → 𝐾 ∈ Lat) | ||
Theorem | odudlatb 17796 | The dual of a distributive lattice is a distributive lattice and conversely. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐾 ∈ DLat ↔ 𝐷 ∈ DLat)) | ||
Theorem | dlatjmdi 17797 | In a distributive lattice, joins distribute over meets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ DLat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑍))) | ||
Syntax | cps 17798 | Extend class notation with the class of all posets. |
class PosetRel | ||
Syntax | ctsr 17799 | Extend class notation with the class of all totally ordered sets. |
class TosetRel | ||
Definition | df-ps 17800 | Define the class of all posets (partially ordered sets) with weak ordering (e.g., "less than or equal to" instead of "less than"). A poset is a relation which is transitive, reflexive, and antisymmetric. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2008.) |
⊢ PosetRel = {𝑟 ∣ (Rel 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∘ 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 ∩ ◡𝑟) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑟))} |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |