Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 265 of 449) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28623) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28624-30146) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30147-44804) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | miduniq2 26401 | If two point inversions commute, they are identical. Theorem 7.19 of [Schwabhauser] p. 52. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐴)‘((𝑆‘𝐵)‘𝑋)) = ((𝑆‘𝐵)‘((𝑆‘𝐴)‘𝑋))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | colmid 26402 | Colinearity and equidistance implies midpoint. Theorem 7.20 of [Schwabhauser] p. 52. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝐴) = (𝑋 − 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 = (𝑀‘𝐴) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | symquadlem 26403 | Lemma of the symetrial quadrilateral. The diagonals of quadrilaterals with congruent opposing sides intersect at their middle point. In Euclidean geometry, such quadrilaterals are called parallelograms, as opposing sides are parallel. However, this is not necessarily true in the case of absolute geometry. Lemma 7.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 52. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐷) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑀‘𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | krippenlem 26404 | Lemma for krippen 26405. We can assume krippen.7 "without loss of generality" (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝑋) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑆‘𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐶 − 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐸) = (𝐶 − 𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑁‘𝐸)) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | krippen 26405 | Krippenlemma (German for crib's lemma) Lemma 7.22 of [Schwabhauser] p. 53. proven by Gupta 1965 as Theorem 3.45. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝑋) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑆‘𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐶 − 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐸) = (𝐶 − 𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑁‘𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | midexlem 26406* | Lemma for the existence of a middle point. Lemma 7.25 of [Schwabhauser] p. 55. This proof of the existence of a midpoint requires the existence of a third point 𝐶 equidistant to 𝐴 and 𝐵 This condition will be removed later. Because the operation notation (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) for a midpoint implies its uniqueness, it cannot be used until uniqueness is proven, and until then, an equivalent mirror point notation 𝐵 = (𝑀‘𝐴) has to be used. See mideu 26452 for the existence and uniqueness of the midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝑥) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐶 − 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 𝐵 = (𝑀‘𝐴)) | ||
Syntax | crag 26407 | Declare the constant for the class of right angles. |
class ∟G | ||
Definition | df-rag 26408* | Define the class of right angles. Definition 8.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 57. See israg 26411. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ ∟G = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ Word (Base‘𝑔) ∣ ((♯‘𝑤) = 3 ∧ ((𝑤‘0)(dist‘𝑔)(𝑤‘2)) = ((𝑤‘0)(dist‘𝑔)(((pInvG‘𝑔)‘(𝑤‘1))‘(𝑤‘2))))}) | ||
Syntax | cperpg 26409 | Declare the constant for the perpendicular relation. |
class ⟂G | ||
Definition | df-perpg 26410* | Define the "perpendicular" relation. Definition 8.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 59. See isperp 26426. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Sep-2019.) |
⊢ ⟂G = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑏)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑏 〈“𝑢𝑥𝑣”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝑔))}) | ||
Theorem | israg 26411 | Property for 3 points A, B, C to form a right angle. Definition 8.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 57. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐴 − ((𝑆‘𝐵)‘𝐶)))) | ||
Theorem | ragcom 26412 | Commutative rule for right angles. Theorem 8.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 57. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐶𝐵𝐴”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | ragcol 26413 | The right angle property is independent of the choice of point on one side. Theorem 8.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 58. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐷) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐷𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | ragmir 26414 | Right angle property is preserved by point inversion. Theorem 8.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 58. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵((𝑆‘𝐵)‘𝐶)”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | mirrag 26415 | Right angle is conserved by point inversion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“(𝑀‘𝐴)(𝑀‘𝐵)(𝑀‘𝐶)”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | ragtrivb 26416 | Trivial right angle. Theorem 8.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 58. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐵”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | ragflat2 26417 | Deduce equality from two right angles. Theorem 8.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 58. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Sep-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐷𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | ragflat 26418 | Deduce equality from two right angles. Theorem 8.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 58. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Sep-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐶𝐵”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | ragtriva 26419 | Trivial right angle. Theorem 8.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 58. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Sep-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐴”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | ragflat3 26420 | Right angle and colinearity. Theorem 8.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 58. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Sep-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | ragcgr 26421 | Right angle and colinearity. Theorem 8.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 58. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Sep-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | motrag 26422 | Right angles are preserved by motions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“(𝐹‘𝐴)(𝐹‘𝐵)(𝐹‘𝐶)”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | ragncol 26423 | Right angle implies non-colinearity. A consequence of theorem 8.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 58. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | perpln1 26424 | Derive a line from perpendicularity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) | ||
Theorem | perpln2 26425 | Derive a line from perpendicularity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿) | ||
Theorem | isperp 26426* | Property for 2 lines A, B to be perpendicular. Item (ii) of definition 8.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 59. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Oct-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 〈“𝑢𝑥𝑣”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))) | ||
Theorem | perpcom 26427 | The "perpendicular" relation commutes. Theorem 8.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 59. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Oct-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴) | ||
Theorem | perpneq 26428 | Two perpendicular lines are different. Theorem 8.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 59. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Oct-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | isperp2 26429* | Property for 2 lines A, B, intersecting at a point X to be perpendicular. Item (i) of definition 8.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 59. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Oct-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 〈“𝑢𝑋𝑣”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))) | ||
Theorem | isperp2d 26430 | One direction of isperp2 26429. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝑈𝑋𝑉”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | ragperp 26431 | Deduce that two lines are perpendicular from a right angle statement. One direction of theorem 8.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 59. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Oct-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ≠ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝑈𝑋𝑉”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵) | ||
Theorem | footexALT 26432* | Alternative version of footex 26435 which minimization requires a notably long time. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶𝐿𝑥)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴) | ||
Theorem | footexlem1 26433 | Lemma for footex 26435 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐸𝐿𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐹𝐼𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝑌) = (𝐸 − 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑅)‘𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑍) = (𝑌 − 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑄)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑄) = (𝑌 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ((((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑍)‘𝑄)𝐼𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝐷) = (𝑌 − 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑋)‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | footexlem2 26434 | Lemma for footex 26435 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐸𝐿𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐹𝐼𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝑌) = (𝐸 − 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑅)‘𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑍) = (𝑌 − 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑄)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑄) = (𝑌 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ((((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑍)‘𝑄)𝐼𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝐷) = (𝑌 − 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑋)‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶𝐿𝑋)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴) | ||
Theorem | footex 26435* | From a point 𝐶 outside of a line 𝐴, there exists a point 𝑥 on 𝐴 such that (𝐶𝐿𝑥) is perpendicular to 𝐴. This point is unique, see foot 26436. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶𝐿𝑥)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴) | ||
Theorem | foot 26436* | From a point 𝐶 outside of a line 𝐴, there exists a unique point 𝑥 on 𝐴 such that (𝐶𝐿𝑥) is perpendicular to 𝐴. That point is called the foot from 𝐶 on 𝐴. Theorem 8.18 of [Schwabhauser] p. 60. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶𝐿𝑥)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴) | ||
Theorem | footne 26437 | Uniqueness of the foot point. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | footeq 26438 | Uniqueness of the foot point. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑍)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌𝐿𝑍)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌) | ||
Theorem | hlperpnel 26439 | A point on a half-line which is perpendicular to a line cannot be on that line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑈𝐿𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉(𝐾‘𝑈)𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | perprag 26440 | Deduce a right angle from perpendicular lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐶𝐷”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | perpdragALT 26441 | Deduce a right angle from perpendicular lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐵𝐿𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | perpdrag 26442 | Deduce a right angle from perpendicular lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐵𝐿𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | colperp 26443 | Deduce a perpendicularity from perpendicularity and colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐶)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐷) | ||
Theorem | colperpexlem1 26444 | Lemma for colperp 26443. First part of lemma 8.20 of [Schwabhauser] p. 62. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Oct-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑆‘𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑆‘𝑄) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾‘(𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝑁‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐵𝐴𝑄”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | colperpexlem2 26445 | Lemma for colperpex 26447. Second part of lemma 8.20 of [Schwabhauser] p. 62. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑆‘𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑆‘𝑄) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾‘(𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝑁‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑄) | ||
Theorem | colperpexlem3 26446* | Lemma for colperpex 26447. Case 1 of theorem 8.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 63. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴𝐿𝑝)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝑝)))) | ||
Theorem | colperpex 26447* | In dimension 2 and above, on a line (𝐴𝐿𝐵) there is always a perpendicular 𝑃 from 𝐴 on a given plane (here given by 𝐶, in case 𝐶 does not lie on the line). Theorem 8.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 63. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴𝐿𝑝)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝑝)))) | ||
Theorem | mideulem2 26448 | Lemma for opphllem 26449, which is itself used for mideu 26452. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑄𝐿𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑄𝐼𝑂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑄)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑂) = (𝐵 − 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑇𝐼𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (((𝑆‘𝐴)‘𝑂)𝐼𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑍) = (𝑋 − 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = ((𝑆‘𝑀)‘𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝑀) | ||
Theorem | opphllem 26449* | Lemma 8.24 of [Schwabhauser] p. 66. This is used later for mideulem 26450 and later for opphl 26468. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑄𝐿𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑄𝐼𝑂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑄)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑂) = (𝐵 − 𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑂 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | mideulem 26450* | Lemma for mideu 26452. We can assume mideulem.9 "without loss of generality" (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑄𝐿𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑄𝐼𝑂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑂)(≤G‘𝐺)(𝐵 − 𝑄)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | midex 26451* | Existence of the midpoint, part Theorem 8.22 of [Schwabhauser] p. 64. Note that this proof requires a construction in 2 dimensions or more, i.e. it does not prove the existence of a midpoint in dimension 1, for a geometry restricted to a line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | mideu 26452* | Existence and uniqueness of the midpoint, Theorem 8.22 of [Schwabhauser] p. 64. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | islnopp 26453* | The property for two points 𝐴 and 𝐵 to lie on the opposite sides of a set 𝐷 Definition 9.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 67. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑂𝐵 ↔ ((¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵)))) | ||
Theorem | islnoppd 26454* | Deduce that 𝐴 and 𝐵 lie on opposite sides of line 𝐿. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵) | ||
Theorem | oppne1 26455* | Points lying on opposite sides of a line cannot be on the line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | oppne2 26456* | Points lying on opposite sides of a line cannot be on the line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | oppne3 26457* | Points lying on opposite sides of a line cannot be equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | oppcom 26458* | Commutativity rule for "opposite" Theorem 9.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 67. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐴) | ||
Theorem | opptgdim2 26459* | If two points opposite to a line exist, dimension must be 2 or more. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) | ||
Theorem | oppnid 26460* | The "opposite to a line" relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴𝑂𝐴) | ||
Theorem | opphllem1 26461* | Lemma for opphl 26468. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑆‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐶) | ||
Theorem | opphllem2 26462* | Lemma for opphl 26468. Lemma 9.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 68. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑆‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝐵) ∨ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝐴))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐶) | ||
Theorem | opphllem3 26463* | Lemma for opphl 26468: We assume opphllem3.l "without loss of generality". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 − 𝐶)(≤G‘𝐺)(𝑅 − 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑅) = 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴 ↔ (𝑁‘𝑈)(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | opphllem4 26464* | Lemma for opphl 26468. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 − 𝐶)(≤G‘𝐺)(𝑅 − 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑅) = 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈𝑂𝑉) | ||
Theorem | opphllem5 26465* | Second part of Lemma 9.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 68. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈𝑂𝑉) | ||
Theorem | opphllem6 26466* | First part of Lemma 9.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 68. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑅) = 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴 ↔ (𝑁‘𝑈)(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | oppperpex 26467* | Restating colperpex 26447 using the "opposite side of a line" relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴𝐿𝑝)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐷 ∧ 𝐶𝑂𝑝)) | ||
Theorem | opphl 26468* | If two points 𝐴 and 𝐶 lie on the opposite side of a line 𝐷 then any point of the half line (𝑅 𝐴) also lies opposite to 𝐶. Theorem 9.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 69. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐶) | ||
Theorem | outpasch 26469* | Axiom of Pasch, outer form. This was proven by Gupta from other axioms and is therefore presented as Theorem 9.6 in [Schwabhauser] p. 70. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | hlpasch 26470* | An application of the axiom of Pasch for half-lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴(𝐾‘𝐵)𝑒 ∧ 𝑒 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝐷))) | ||
Syntax | chpg 26471 | "Belong to the same open half-plane" relation for points in a geometry. |
class hpG | ||
Definition | df-hpg 26472* | Define the open half plane relation for a geometry 𝐺. Definition 9.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 71. See hpgbr 26474 to find the same formulation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ hpG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑑 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ↦ {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑔) / 𝑖]∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑝 (((𝑎 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑑 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝑖𝑐)) ∧ ((𝑏 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑑 𝑡 ∈ (𝑏𝑖𝑐)))})) | ||
Theorem | ishpg 26473* | Value of the half-plane relation for a given line 𝐷. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷) = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑎𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝑏𝑂𝑐)}) | ||
Theorem | hpgbr 26474* | Half-planes : property for points 𝐴 and 𝐵 to belong to the same open half plane delimited by line 𝐷. Definition 9.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 71. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐵𝑂𝑐))) | ||
Theorem | hpgne1 26475* | Points on the open half plane cannot lie on its border. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | hpgne2 26476* | Points on the open half plane cannot lie on its border. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | lnopp2hpgb 26477* | Theorem 9.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 71. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵𝑂𝐶 ↔ 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | lnoppnhpg 26478* | If two points lie on the opposite side of a line 𝐷, they are not on the same half-plane. Theorem 9.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵) | ||
Theorem | hpgerlem 26479* | Lemma for the proof that the half-plane relation is an equivalence relation. Lemma 9.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 𝐴𝑂𝑐) | ||
Theorem | hpgid 26480* | The half-plane relation is reflexive. Theorem 9.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴) | ||
Theorem | hpgcom 26481* | The half-plane relation commutes. Theorem 9.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴) | ||
Theorem | hpgtr 26482* | The half-plane relation is transitive. Theorem 9.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐶) | ||
Theorem | colopp 26483* | Opposite sides of a line for colinear points. Theorem 9.18 of [Schwabhauser] p. 73. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑂𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | colhp 26484* | Half-plane relation for colinear points. Theorem 9.19 of [Schwabhauser] p. 73. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | hphl 26485* | If two points are on the same half-line with endpoint on a line, they are on the same half-plane defined by this line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑂 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))} & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵(𝐾‘𝐴)𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐶) | ||
Syntax | cmid 26486 | Declare the constant for the midpoint operation. |
class midG | ||
Syntax | clmi 26487 | Declare the constant for the line mirroring function. |
class lInvG | ||
Definition | df-mid 26488* | Define the midpoint operation. Definition 10.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 88. See ismidb 26492, midbtwn 26493, and midcgr 26494. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ midG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ (℩𝑚 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)𝑏 = (((pInvG‘𝑔)‘𝑚)‘𝑎)))) | ||
Definition | df-lmi 26489* | Define the line mirroring function. Definition 10.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. See islmib 26501. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ lInvG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑚 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ (℩𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)((𝑎(midG‘𝑔)𝑏) ∈ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑚(⟂G‘𝑔)(𝑎(LineG‘𝑔)𝑏) ∨ 𝑎 = 𝑏)))))) | ||
Theorem | midf 26490 | Midpoint as a function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (midG‘𝐺):(𝑃 × 𝑃)⟶𝑃) | ||
Theorem | midcl 26491 | Closure of the midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) ∈ 𝑃) | ||
Theorem | ismidb 26492 | Property of the midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑀)‘𝐴) ↔ (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) = 𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | midbtwn 26493 | Betweenness of midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | midcgr 26494 | Congruence of midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐶 − 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | midid 26495 | Midpoint of a null segment. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | midcom 26496 | Commutativity rule for the midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) = (𝐵(midG‘𝐺)𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | mirmid 26497 | Point inversion preserves midpoints. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐴)(midG‘𝐺)(𝑆‘𝐵)) = (𝑆‘(𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | lmieu 26498* | Uniqueness of the line mirror point. Theorem 10.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 88. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝑏) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑏) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝑏))) | ||
Theorem | lmif 26499 | Line mirror as a function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) & ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝑃⟶𝑃) | ||
Theorem | lmicl 26500 | Closure of the line mirror. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) & ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑃) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |