Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 278 of 450) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28697) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28698-30220) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30221-44913) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | wwlksnonfi 27701 | In a finite graph, the set of walks of a fixed length between two vertices is finite. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 15-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Mar-2022.) |
⊢ ((Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ Fin → (𝐴(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐵) ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | wspthsswwlknon 27702 | The set of simple paths of a fixed length between two vertices is a subset of the set of walks of the fixed length between the two vertices. (Contributed by AV, 15-May-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐴(𝑁 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐵) | ||
Theorem | wspthnonfi 27703 | In a finite graph, the set of simple paths of a fixed length between two vertices is finite. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 15-May-2021.) |
⊢ ((Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ Fin → (𝐴(𝑁 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐵) ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | wspniunwspnon 27704* | The set of nonempty simple paths of fixed length is the double union of the simple paths of the fixed length between different vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Mar-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑁 WSPathsN 𝐺) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥})(𝑥(𝑁 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | wspn0 27705 | If there are no vertices, then there are no simple paths (of any length), too. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 13-Mar-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑉 = ∅ → (𝑁 WSPathsN 𝐺) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | 2wlkdlem1 27706 | Lemma 1 for 2wlkd 27717. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 ⇒ ⊢ (♯‘𝑃) = ((♯‘𝐹) + 1) | ||
Theorem | 2wlkdlem2 27707 | Lemma 2 for 2wlkd 27717. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 ⇒ ⊢ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)) = {0, 1} | ||
Theorem | 2wlkdlem3 27708 | Lemma 3 for 2wlkd 27717. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑃‘0) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑃‘1) = 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃‘2) = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | 2wlkdlem4 27709* | Lemma 4 for 2wlkd 27717. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
Theorem | 2wlkdlem5 27710* | Lemma 5 for 2wlkd 27717. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))) | ||
Theorem | 2pthdlem1 27711* | Lemma 1 for 2pthd 27721. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑃))∀𝑗 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑘 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘𝑗))) | ||
Theorem | 2wlkdlem6 27712 | Lemma 6 for 2wlkd 27717. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐼‘𝐾))) | ||
Theorem | 2wlkdlem7 27713 | Lemma 7 for 2wlkd 27717. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ V ∧ 𝐾 ∈ V)) | ||
Theorem | 2wlkdlem8 27714 | Lemma 8 for 2wlkd 27717. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘0) = 𝐽 ∧ (𝐹‘1) = 𝐾)) | ||
Theorem | 2wlkdlem9 27715 | Lemma 9 for 2wlkd 27717. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)))) | ||
Theorem | 2wlkdlem10 27716* | Lemma 10 for 3wlkd 27951. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) | ||
Theorem | 2wlkd 27717 | Construction of a walk from two given edges in a graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 23-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 14-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 2wlkond 27718 | A walk of length 2 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 2trld 27719 | Construction of a trail from two given edges in a graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 24-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 2trlond 27720 | A trail of length 2 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 2pthd 27721 | A path of length 2 from one vertex to another vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 24-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 2spthd 27722 | A simple path of length 2 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 2pthond 27723 | A simple path of length 2 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 24-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | 2pthon3v 27724* | For a vertex adjacent to two other vertices there is a simple path of length 2 between these other vertices in a hypergraph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 24-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸)) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2)) | ||
Theorem | umgr2adedgwlklem 27725 | Lemma for umgr2adedgwlk 27726, umgr2adedgspth 27729, etc. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸) → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)))) | ||
Theorem | umgr2adedgwlk 27726 | In a multigraph, two adjacent edges form a walk of length 2. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝐴, 𝐵}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐾) = {𝐵, 𝐶}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2 ∧ (𝐴 = (𝑃‘0) ∧ 𝐵 = (𝑃‘1) ∧ 𝐶 = (𝑃‘2)))) | ||
Theorem | umgr2adedgwlkon 27727 | In a multigraph, two adjacent edges form a walk between two vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝐴, 𝐵}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐾) = {𝐵, 𝐶}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | umgr2adedgwlkonALT 27728 | Alternate proof for umgr2adedgwlkon 27727, using umgr2adedgwlk 27726, but with a much longer proof! In a multigraph, two adjacent edges form a walk between two (different) vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jan-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝐴, 𝐵}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐾) = {𝐵, 𝐶}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | umgr2adedgspth 27729 | In a multigraph, two adjacent edges with different endvertices form a simple path of length 2. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐹 = 〈“𝐽𝐾”〉 & ⊢ 𝑃 = 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝐴, 𝐵}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐾) = {𝐵, 𝐶}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃) | ||
Theorem | umgr2wlk 27730* | In a multigraph, there is a walk of length 2 for each pair of adjacent edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2 ∧ (𝐴 = (𝑝‘0) ∧ 𝐵 = (𝑝‘1) ∧ 𝐶 = (𝑝‘2)))) | ||
Theorem | umgr2wlkon 27731* | For each pair of adjacent edges in a multigraph, there is a walk of length 2 between the not common vertices of the edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jan-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑝) | ||
Theorem | elwwlks2s3 27732* | A walk of length 2 as word is a length 3 string. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (2 WWalksN 𝐺) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 𝑊 = 〈“𝑎𝑏𝑐”〉) | ||
Theorem | midwwlks2s3 27733* | There is a vertex between the endpoints of a walk of length 2 between two vertices as length 3 string. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (2 WWalksN 𝐺) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊‘1) = 𝑏) | ||
Theorem | wwlks2onv 27734 | If a length 3 string represents a walk of length 2, its components are vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Feb-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 14-Mar-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) | ||
Theorem | elwwlks2ons3im 27735 | A walk as word of length 2 between two vertices is a length 3 string and its second symbol is a vertex. (Contributed by AV, 14-Mar-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) → (𝑊 = 〈“𝐴(𝑊‘1)𝐶”〉 ∧ (𝑊‘1) ∈ 𝑉)) | ||
Theorem | elwwlks2ons3 27736* | For each walk of length 2 between two vertices, there is a third vertex in the middle of the walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 14-Mar-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊 = 〈“𝐴𝑏𝐶”〉 ∧ 〈“𝐴𝑏𝐶”〉 ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | s3wwlks2on 27737* | A length 3 string which represents a walk of length 2 between two vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2))) | ||
Theorem | umgrwwlks2on 27738 | A walk of length 2 between two vertices as word in a multigraph. This theorem would also hold for pseudographs, but to prove this the cases 𝐴 = 𝐵 and/or 𝐵 = 𝐶 must be considered separately. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸))) | ||
Theorem | wwlks2onsym 27739 | There is a walk of length 2 from one vertex to another vertex iff there is a walk of length 2 from the other vertex to the first vertex. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ 〈“𝐶𝐵𝐴”〉 ∈ (𝐶(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | elwwlks2on 27740* | A walk of length 2 between two vertices as length 3 string. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊 = 〈“𝐴𝑏𝐶”〉 ∧ ∃𝑓(𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑊 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2)))) | ||
Theorem | elwspths2on 27741* | A simple path of length 2 between two vertices (in a graph) as length 3 string. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Mar-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊 = 〈“𝐴𝑏𝐶”〉 ∧ 〈“𝐴𝑏𝐶”〉 ∈ (𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐶)))) | ||
Theorem | wpthswwlks2on 27742 | For two different vertices, a walk of length 2 between these vertices is a simple path of length 2 between these vertices in a simple graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 13-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 16-Mar-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐵) = (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | 2wspdisj 27743* | All simple paths of length 2 from a fixed vertex to another vertex are disjunct. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ Disj 𝑏 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝐴})(𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝑏) | ||
Theorem | 2wspiundisj 27744* | All simple paths of length 2 from a fixed vertex to another vertex are disjunct. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 14-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ Disj 𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∪ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑎})(𝑎(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝑏) | ||
Theorem | usgr2wspthons3 27745 | A simple path of length 2 between two vertices represented as length 3 string corresponds to two adjacent edges in a simple graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Mar-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸))) | ||
Theorem | usgr2wspthon 27746* | A simple path of length 2 between two vertices corresponds to two adjacent edges in a simple graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-May-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑇 ∈ (𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ((𝑇 = 〈“𝐴𝑏𝐶”〉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ ({𝐴, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸)))) | ||
Theorem | elwwlks2 27747* | A walk of length 2 between two vertices as length 3 string in a pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 14-Mar-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝑊 ∈ (2 WWalksN 𝐺) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊 = 〈“𝑎𝑏𝑐”〉 ∧ ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2 ∧ (𝑎 = (𝑝‘0) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝑝‘1) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝑝‘2)))))) | ||
Theorem | elwspths2spth 27748* | A simple path of length 2 between two vertices as length 3 string in a pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 28-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Mar-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝑊 ∈ (2 WSPathsN 𝐺) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊 = 〈“𝑎𝑏𝑐”〉 ∧ ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2 ∧ (𝑎 = (𝑝‘0) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝑝‘1) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝑝‘2)))))) | ||
Theorem | rusgrnumwwlkl1 27749* | In a k-regular graph, there are k walks (as word) of length 1 starting at each vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 28-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉) → (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (1 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑃}) = 𝐾) | ||
Theorem | rusgrnumwwlkslem 27750* | Lemma for rusgrnumwwlks 27755. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ (𝑌 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑍 ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑃} → {𝑤 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} = {𝑤 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ (𝑌‘0) = 𝑃 ∧ 𝜓)}) | ||
Theorem | rusgrnumwwlklem 27751* | Lemma for rusgrnumwwlk 27756 etc. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣})) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑃𝐿𝑁) = (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑃})) | ||
Theorem | rusgrnumwwlkb0 27752* | Induction base 0 for rusgrnumwwlk 27756. Here, we do not need the regularity of the graph yet. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣})) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑃𝐿0) = 1) | ||
Theorem | rusgrnumwwlkb1 27753* | Induction base 1 for rusgrnumwwlk 27756. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 28-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣})) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑃𝐿1) = 𝐾) | ||
Theorem | rusgr0edg 27754* | Special case for graphs without edges: There are no walks of length greater than 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣})) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 0 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑃𝐿𝑁) = 0) | ||
Theorem | rusgrnumwwlks 27755* | Induction step for rusgrnumwwlk 27756. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-May-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣})) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → ((𝑃𝐿𝑁) = (𝐾↑𝑁) → (𝑃𝐿(𝑁 + 1)) = (𝐾↑(𝑁 + 1)))) | ||
Theorem | rusgrnumwwlk 27756* |
In a 𝐾-regular graph, the number of walks
of a fixed length 𝑁
from a fixed vertex is 𝐾 to the power of 𝑁. By
definition,
(𝑁
WWalksN 𝐺) is the
set of walks (as words) with length 𝑁,
and (𝑃𝐿𝑁) is the number of walks with length
𝑁
starting at
the vertex 𝑃. Because of the 𝐾-regularity, a walk can be
continued in 𝐾 different ways at the end vertex of
the walk, and
this repeated 𝑁 times.
This theorem even holds for 𝑁 = 0: in this case, the walk consists of only one vertex 𝑃, so the number of walks of length 𝑁 = 0 starting with 𝑃 is (𝐾↑0) = 1. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣})) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → (𝑃𝐿𝑁) = (𝐾↑𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | rusgrnumwwlkg 27757* | In a 𝐾-regular graph, the number of walks (as words) of a fixed length 𝑁 from a fixed vertex is 𝐾 to the power of 𝑁. Closed form of rusgrnumwwlk 27756. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑃}) = (𝐾↑𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | rusgrnumwlkg 27758* | In a k-regular graph, the number of walks of a fixed length n from a fixed vertex is k to the power of n. This theorem corresponds to statement 11 in [Huneke] p. 2: "The total number of walks v(0) v(1) ... v(n-2) from a fixed vertex v = v(0) is k^(n-2) as G is k-regular." This theorem even holds for n=0: then the walk consists of only one vertex v(0), so the number of walks of length n=0 starting with v=v(0) is 1=k^0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 5-Aug-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑃)}) = (𝐾↑𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | clwwlknclwwlkdif 27759* | The set 𝐴 of walks of length 𝑁 starting with a fixed vertex 𝑉 and ending not at this vertex is the difference between the set 𝐶 of walks of length 𝑁 starting with this vertex 𝑋 and the set 𝐵 of closed walks of length 𝑁 anchored at this vertex 𝑋. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 16-Mar-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ (lastS‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑋)} & ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑋(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝑋) & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑋} ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | clwwlknclwwlkdifnum 27760* | In a 𝐾-regular graph, the size of the set 𝐴 of walks of length 𝑁 starting with a fixed vertex 𝑋 and ending not at this vertex is the difference between 𝐾 to the power of 𝑁 and the size of the set 𝐵 of closed walks of length 𝑁 anchored at this vertex 𝑋. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 8-Mar-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Mar-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ (lastS‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑋)} & ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑋(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝑋) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ 𝑉 ∈ Fin) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → (♯‘𝐴) = ((𝐾↑𝑁) − (♯‘𝐵))) | ||
In general, a closed walk is an alternating sequence of vertices and edges, as defined in df-clwlks 27554: p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n), with p(n) = p(0). Often, it is sufficient to refer to a walk by the (cyclic) sequence of its vertices, i.e omitting its edges in its representation: p(0) p(1) ... p(n-1) p(0), see the corresponding remark on cycles (which are special closed walks) in [Diestel] p. 7. As for "walks as words" in general, the concept of a Word, see df-word 13865, is also used in definitions df-clwwlk 27762 and df-clwwlkn 27805, and the representation of a closed walk as the sequence of its vertices is called "closed walk as word". In contrast to "walks as words", the terminating vertex p(n) of a closed walk is omitted in the representation of a closed walk as word, see definitions df-clwwlk 27762, df-clwwlkn 27805 and df-clwwlknon 27869, because it is always equal to the first vertex of the closed walk. This represenation has the advantage that the vertices can be cyclically shifted without changing the represented closed walk. Furthermore, the length of a closed walk (i.e. the number of its edges) equals the number of symbols/vertices of the word representing the closed walk. To avoid to handle the degenerate case of representing a (closed) walk of length 0 by the empty word, this case is excluded within the definition (𝑤 ≠ ∅). This is because a walk of length 0 is anchored at an arbitrary vertex by the general definition for closed walks, see 0clwlkv 27912, which neither can be reflected by the empty word nor by a singleton word 〈“𝑣”〉 with vertex v : 〈“𝑣”〉 represents the walk "𝑣 𝑣", which is a (closed) walk of length 1 (if there is an edge/loop from 𝑣 to 𝑣), see loopclwwlkn1b 27822. Therefore, a closed walk corresponds to a closed walk as word only for walks of length at least 1, see clwlkclwwlk2 27783 or clwlkclwwlken 27792. Although the set ClWWalksN of all closed walks of a fixed length as words over the set of vertices is defined as function over ℕ0, the fixed length is usually not 0, because (0 ClWWalksN 𝐺) = ∅ (see clwwlkn0 27808). Analogous to (𝐴(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐵), the set of walks of a fixed length 𝑁 between two vertices 𝐴 and 𝐵, the set (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) of closed walks of a fixed length 𝑁 anchored at a fixed vertex 𝑋 is defined by df-clwwlknon 27869. This definition is also based on ℕ0 instead of ℕ, with (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)0) = ∅ (see clwwlk0on0 27873). clwwlknon1le1 27882 states that there is at most one (closed) walk of length 1 on a vertex, which would consist of a loop (see clwwlknon1loop 27879). And in a 𝐾-regular graph, there are 𝐾 closed walks of length 2 on each vertex, see clwwlknon2num 27886. | ||
Syntax | cclwwlk 27761 | Extend class notation with closed walks (in an undirected graph) as word over the set of vertices. |
class ClWWalks | ||
Definition | df-clwwlk 27762* | Define the set of all closed walks (in an undirected graph) as words over the set of vertices. Such a word corresponds to the sequence p(0) p(1) ... p(n-1) of the vertices in a closed walk p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n)=p(0) as defined in df-clwlks 27554. Notice that the word does not contain the terminating vertex p(n) of the walk, because it is always equal to the first vertex of the closed walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ ClWWalks = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ Word (Vtx‘𝑔) ∣ (𝑤 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑤) − 1)){(𝑤‘𝑖), (𝑤‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ (Edg‘𝑔) ∧ {(lastS‘𝑤), (𝑤‘0)} ∈ (Edg‘𝑔))}) | ||
Theorem | clwwlk 27763* | The set of closed walks (in an undirected graph) as words over the set of vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ (𝑤 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑤) − 1)){(𝑤‘𝑖), (𝑤‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {(lastS‘𝑤), (𝑤‘0)} ∈ 𝐸)} | ||
Theorem | isclwwlk 27764* | Properties of a word to represent a closed walk (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ↔ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ≠ ∅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑊) − 1)){(𝑊‘𝑖), (𝑊‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {(lastS‘𝑊), (𝑊‘0)} ∈ 𝐸)) | ||
Theorem | clwwlkbp 27765 | Basic properties of a closed walk (in an undirected graph) as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ≠ ∅)) | ||
Theorem | clwwlkgt0 27766 | There is no empty closed walk (i.e. a closed walk without any edge) represented by a word of vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) → 0 < (♯‘𝑊)) | ||
Theorem | clwwlksswrd 27767 | Closed walks (represented by words) are words. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 25-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ⊆ Word (Vtx‘𝐺) | ||
Theorem | clwwlk1loop 27768 | A closed walk of length 1 is a loop. See also clwlkl1loop 27566. (Contributed by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ (♯‘𝑊) = 1) → {(𝑊‘0), (𝑊‘0)} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | clwwlkccatlem 27769* | Lemma for clwwlkccat 27770: index 𝑗 is shifted up by (♯‘𝐴), and the case 𝑖 = ((♯‘𝐴) − 1) is covered by the "bridge" {(lastS‘𝐴), (𝐵‘0)} = {(lastS‘𝐴), (𝐴‘0)} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺). (Contributed by AV, 23-Apr-2022.) |
⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ Word (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝐴) − 1)){(𝐴‘𝑖), (𝐴‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺) ∧ {(lastS‘𝐴), (𝐴‘0)} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)) ∧ ((𝐵 ∈ Word (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝐵) − 1)){(𝐵‘𝑗), (𝐵‘(𝑗 + 1))} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺) ∧ {(lastS‘𝐵), (𝐵‘0)} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)) ∧ (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0)) → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘(𝐴 ++ 𝐵)) − 1)){((𝐴 ++ 𝐵)‘𝑖), ((𝐴 ++ 𝐵)‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | clwwlkccat 27770 | The concatenation of two words representing closed walks anchored at the same vertex represents a closed walk. The resulting walk is a "double loop", starting at the common vertex, coming back to the common vertex by the first walk, following the second walk and finally coming back to the common vertex again. (Contributed by AV, 23-Apr-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0)) → (𝐴 ++ 𝐵) ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | umgrclwwlkge2 27771 | A closed walk in a multigraph has a length of at least 2 (because it cannot have a loop). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 16-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UMGraph → (𝑃 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) → 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlklem2a1 27772* | Lemma 1 for clwlkclwwlklem2a 27778. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((((♯‘𝑃) − 1) − 0) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 ∧ {(𝑃‘((♯‘𝑃) − 2)), (𝑃‘0)} ∈ ran 𝐸)) → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸)) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlklem2a2 27773* | Lemma 2 for clwlkclwwlklem2a 27778. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jun-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ if(𝑥 < ((♯‘𝑃) − 2), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘0)}))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (♯‘𝐹) = ((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlklem2a3 27774* | Lemma 3 for clwlkclwwlklem2a 27778. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jun-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ if(𝑥 < ((♯‘𝑃) − 2), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘0)}))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)) = (lastS‘𝑃)) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlklem2fv1 27775* | Lemma 4a for clwlkclwwlklem2a 27778. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ if(𝑥 < ((♯‘𝑃) − 2), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘0)}))) ⇒ ⊢ (((♯‘𝑃) ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 2))) → (𝐹‘𝐼) = (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝐼), (𝑃‘(𝐼 + 1))})) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlklem2fv2 27776* | Lemma 4b for clwlkclwwlklem2a 27778. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ if(𝑥 < ((♯‘𝑃) − 2), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘0)}))) ⇒ ⊢ (((♯‘𝑃) ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (𝐹‘((♯‘𝑃) − 2)) = (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘((♯‘𝑃) − 2)), (𝑃‘0)})) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlklem2a4 27777* | Lemma 4 for clwlkclwwlklem2a 27778. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ if(𝑥 < ((♯‘𝑃) − 2), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘0)}))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1))) → ({(𝑃‘𝐼), (𝑃‘(𝐼 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 → (𝐸‘(𝐹‘𝐼)) = {(𝑃‘𝐼), (𝑃‘(𝐼 + 1))}))) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlklem2a 27778* | Lemma for clwlkclwwlklem2 27780. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ if(𝑥 < ((♯‘𝑃) − 2), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘0)}))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((((♯‘𝑃) − 1) − 0) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 ∧ {(𝑃‘((♯‘𝑃) − 2)), (𝑃‘0)} ∈ ran 𝐸)) → ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐸 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐸‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))}) ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlklem1 27779* | Lemma 1 for clwlkclwwlk 27782. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((((♯‘𝑃) − 1) − 0) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 ∧ {(𝑃‘((♯‘𝑃) − 2)), (𝑃‘0)} ∈ ran 𝐸)) → ∃𝑓((𝑓 ∈ Word dom 𝐸 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝑓))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑓))(𝐸‘(𝑓‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))}) ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝑓))))) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlklem2 27780* | Lemma 2 for clwlkclwwlk 27782. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ (((𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→𝑅 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐸) ∧ (𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐸‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)))) → ((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝐹) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 ∧ {(𝑃‘((♯‘𝐹) − 1)), (𝑃‘0)} ∈ ran 𝐸)) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlklem3 27781* | Lemma 3 for clwlkclwwlk 27782. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (∃𝑓((𝑓 ∈ Word dom 𝐸 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝑓))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑓))(𝐸‘(𝑓‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))}) ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝑓))) ↔ ((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((((♯‘𝑃) − 1) − 0) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 ∧ {(𝑃‘((♯‘𝑃) − 2)), (𝑃‘0)} ∈ ran 𝐸)))) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlk 27782* | A closed walk as word of length at least 2 corresponds to a closed walk in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (∃𝑓 𝑓(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ ((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ (𝑃 prefix ((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺)))) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlk2 27783* | A closed walk corresponds to a closed walk as word in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Nov-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 1 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (∃𝑓 𝑓(ClWalks‘𝐺)(𝑃 ++ 〈“(𝑃‘0)”〉) ↔ 𝑃 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺))) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlkflem 27784* | Lemma for clwlkclwwlkf 27788. (Contributed by AV, 24-May-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))} & ⊢ 𝐴 = (1st ‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (2nd ‘𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴(Walks‘𝐺)𝐵 ∧ (𝐵‘0) = (𝐵‘(♯‘𝐴)) ∧ (♯‘𝐴) ∈ ℕ)) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlkf1lem2 27785* | Lemma 2 for clwlkclwwlkf1 27790. (Contributed by AV, 24-May-2022.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))} & ⊢ 𝐴 = (1st ‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (2nd ‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (1st ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (2nd ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐵 prefix (♯‘𝐴)) = (𝐸 prefix (♯‘𝐷))) → ((♯‘𝐴) = (♯‘𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐴))(𝐵‘𝑖) = (𝐸‘𝑖))) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlkf1lem3 27786* | Lemma 3 for clwlkclwwlkf1 27790. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))} & ⊢ 𝐴 = (1st ‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (2nd ‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (1st ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (2nd ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐵 prefix (♯‘𝐴)) = (𝐸 prefix (♯‘𝐷))) → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐴))(𝐵‘𝑖) = (𝐸‘𝑖)) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlkfolem 27787* | Lemma for clwlkclwwlkfo 27789. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 1 ≤ (♯‘𝑊) ∧ 〈𝑓, (𝑊 ++ 〈“(𝑊‘0)”〉)〉 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺)) → 〈𝑓, (𝑊 ++ 〈“(𝑊‘0)”〉)〉 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlkf 27788* | 𝐹 is a function from the nonempty closed walks into the closed walks as word in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2022.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑐) prefix ((♯‘(2nd ‘𝑐)) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐹:𝐶⟶(ClWWalks‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlkfo 27789* | 𝐹 is a function from the nonempty closed walks onto the closed walks as words in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 2-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑐) prefix ((♯‘(2nd ‘𝑐)) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐹:𝐶–onto→(ClWWalks‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlkf1 27790* | 𝐹 is a one-to-one function from the nonempty closed walks into the closed walks as words in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 3-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑐) prefix ((♯‘(2nd ‘𝑐)) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1→(ClWWalks‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlkf1o 27791* | 𝐹 is a bijection between the nonempty closed walks and the closed walks as words in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 3-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑐) prefix ((♯‘(2nd ‘𝑐)) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→(ClWWalks‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | clwlkclwwlken 27792* | The set of the nonempty closed walks and the set of closed walks as word are equinumerous in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 4-Nov-2022.) |
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))} ≈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | clwwisshclwwslemlem 27793* | Lemma for clwwisshclwwslem 27794. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (((𝐿 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(𝐿 − 1)){(𝑊‘𝑖), (𝑊‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝑅 ∧ {(𝑊‘(𝐿 − 1)), (𝑊‘0)} ∈ 𝑅) → {(𝑊‘((𝐴 + 𝐵) mod 𝐿)), (𝑊‘(((𝐴 + 1) + 𝐵) mod 𝐿))} ∈ 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | clwwisshclwwslem 27794* | Lemma for clwwisshclwws 27795. (Contributed by AV, 24-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑊))) → ((∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑊) − 1)){(𝑊‘𝑖), (𝑊‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {(lastS‘𝑊), (𝑊‘0)} ∈ 𝐸) → ∀𝑗 ∈ (0..^((♯‘(𝑊 cyclShift 𝑁)) − 1)){((𝑊 cyclShift 𝑁)‘𝑗), ((𝑊 cyclShift 𝑁)‘(𝑗 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸)) | ||
Theorem | clwwisshclwws 27795 | Cyclically shifting a closed walk as word results in a closed walk as word (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))) → (𝑊 cyclShift 𝑁) ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | clwwisshclwwsn 27796 | Cyclically shifting a closed walk as word results in a closed walk as word (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑊))) → (𝑊 cyclShift 𝑁) ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | erclwwlkrel 27797 | ∼ is a relation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑢, 𝑤〉 ∣ (𝑢 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑤))𝑢 = (𝑤 cyclShift 𝑛))} ⇒ ⊢ Rel ∼ | ||
Theorem | erclwwlkeq 27798* | Two classes are equivalent regarding ∼ if both are words and one is the other cyclically shifted. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑢, 𝑤〉 ∣ (𝑢 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑤))𝑢 = (𝑤 cyclShift 𝑛))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑈 ∼ 𝑊 ↔ (𝑈 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑊))𝑈 = (𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛)))) | ||
Theorem | erclwwlkeqlen 27799* | If two classes are equivalent regarding ∼, then they are words of the same length. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑢, 𝑤〉 ∣ (𝑢 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑤))𝑢 = (𝑤 cyclShift 𝑛))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑈 ∼ 𝑊 → (♯‘𝑈) = (♯‘𝑊))) | ||
Theorem | erclwwlkref 27800* | ∼ is a reflexive relation over the set of closed walks (defined as words). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑢, 𝑤〉 ∣ (𝑢 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑤))𝑢 = (𝑤 cyclShift 𝑛))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ↔ 𝑥 ∼ 𝑥) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |