Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 302 of 449) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28623) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28624-30146) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30147-44804) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | atcvat3i 30101 | A condition implying that a certain lattice element is an atom. Part of Lemma 3.2.20 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → (((¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) ∈ HAtoms)) | ||
Theorem | atcvat4i 30102* | A condition implying existence of an atom with the properties shown. Lemma 3.2.20 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑥)))) | ||
Theorem | atdmd 30103 | Two Hilbert lattice elements have the dual modular pair property if the first is an atom. Theorem 7.6(c) of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | atmd 30104 | Two Hilbert lattice elements have the modular pair property if the first is an atom. Theorem 7.6(b) of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | atmd2 30105 | Two Hilbert lattice elements have the dual modular pair property if the second is an atom. Part of Exercise 6 of [Kalmbach] p. 103. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | atabsi 30106 | Absorption of an incomparable atom. Similar to Exercise 7.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ HAtoms → (¬ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | atabs2i 30107 | Absorption of an incomparable atom. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ HAtoms → (¬ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | mdsymlem1 30108* | Lemma for mdsymi 30116. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑝 ∈ Cℋ ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | mdsymlem2 30109* | Lemma for mdsymi 30116. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → (𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ → ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵)))) | ||
Theorem | mdsymlem3 30110* | Lemma for mdsymi 30116. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ ¬ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ) → ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | mdsymlem4 30111* | Lemma for mdsymi 30116. This is the forward direction of Lemma 4(i) of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ HAtoms → ((𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ) ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵)))) | ||
Theorem | mdsymlem5 30112* | Lemma for mdsymi 30116. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑟 ∈ HAtoms) → (¬ 𝑞 = 𝑝 → ((𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵)) → (((𝑐 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑐) ∧ 𝑝 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝑝 ⊆ 𝑐 → 𝑝 ⊆ ((𝑐 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐴)))))) | ||
Theorem | mdsymlem6 30113* | Lemma for mdsymi 30116. This is the converse direction of Lemma 4(i) of [Maeda] p. 168, and is based on the proof of Theorem 1(d) to (e) of [Maeda] p. 167. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑝 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵))) → 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | mdsymlem7 30114* | Lemma for mdsymi 30116. Lemma 4(i) of [Maeda] p. 168. Note that Maeda's 1965 definition of dual modular pair has reversed arguments compared to the later (1970) definition given in Remark 29.6 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 130, which is the one that we use. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ) → (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵))))) | ||
Theorem | mdsymlem8 30115* | Lemma for mdsymi 30116. Lemma 4(ii) of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ) → (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | mdsymi 30116 | M-symmetry of the Hilbert lattice. Lemma 5 of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | mdsym 30117 | M-symmetry of the Hilbert lattice. Lemma 5 of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | dmdsym 30118 | Dual M-symmetry of the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | atdmd2 30119 | Two Hilbert lattice elements have the dual modular pair property if the second is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | sumdmdii 30120 | If the subspace sum of two Hilbert lattice elements is closed, then the elements are a dual modular pair. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 139. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cmmdi 30121 | Commuting subspaces form a modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cmdmdi 30122 | Commuting subspaces form a dual modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | sumdmdlem 30123 | Lemma for sumdmdi 30125. The span of vector 𝐶 not in the subspace sum is "trimmed off." (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) → ((𝐵 +ℋ (span‘{𝐶})) ∩ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | sumdmdlem2 30124* | Lemma for sumdmdi 30125. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | sumdmdi 30125 | The subspace sum of two Hilbert lattice elements is closed iff the elements are a dual modular pair. Theorem 2 of [Holland] p. 1519. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | dmdbr4ati 30126* | Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | dmdbr5ati 30127* | Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | dmdbr6ati 30128* | Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. The modular law takes the form of the shearing identity. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝑥) = ((((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | dmdbr7ati 30129* | Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | mdoc1i 30130 | Orthocomplements form a modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ (⊥‘𝐴) | ||
Theorem | mdoc2i 30131 | Orthocomplements form a modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝑀ℋ 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | dmdoc1i 30132 | Orthocomplements form a dual modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* (⊥‘𝐴) | ||
Theorem | dmdoc2i 30133 | Orthocomplements form a dual modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | mdcompli 30134 | A condition equivalent to the modular pair property. Part of proof of Theorem 1.14 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 4. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) 𝑀ℋ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))) | ||
Theorem | dmdcompli 30135 | A condition equivalent to the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) 𝑀ℋ* (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))) | ||
Theorem | mddmdin0i 30136* | If dual modular implies modular whenever meet is zero, then dual modular implies modular for arbitrary lattice elements. This theorem is needed for the remark after Lemma 7 of [Holland] p. 1524 to hold. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ((𝑥 𝑀ℋ* 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = 0ℋ) → 𝑥 𝑀ℋ 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cdjreui 30137* | A member of the sum of disjoint subspaces has a unique decomposition. Part of Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | cdj1i 30138* | Two ways to express "𝐴 and 𝐵 are completely disjoint subspaces." (1) => (2) in Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑦) + (normℎ‘𝑣)) ≤ (𝑤 · (normℎ‘(𝑦 +ℎ 𝑣)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑦) = 1 → 𝑥 ≤ (normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧))))) | ||
Theorem | cdj3lem1 30139* | A property of "𝐴 and 𝐵 are completely disjoint subspaces." Part of Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑦) + (normℎ‘𝑧)) ≤ (𝑥 · (normℎ‘(𝑦 +ℎ 𝑧)))) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) | ||
Theorem | cdj3lem2 30140* | Lemma for cdj3i 30146. Value of the first-component function 𝑆. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑆‘(𝐶 +ℎ 𝐷)) = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | cdj3lem2a 30141* | Lemma for cdj3i 30146. Closure of the first-component function 𝑆. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑆‘𝐶) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cdj3lem2b 30142* | Lemma for cdj3i 30146. The first-component function 𝑆 is bounded if the subspaces are completely disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑥) + (normℎ‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘(𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢)))) | ||
Theorem | cdj3lem3 30143* | Lemma for cdj3i 30146. Value of the second-component function 𝑇. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑇‘(𝐶 +ℎ 𝐷)) = 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | cdj3lem3a 30144* | Lemma for cdj3i 30146. Closure of the second-component function 𝑇. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑇‘𝐶) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cdj3lem3b 30145* | Lemma for cdj3i 30146. The second-component function 𝑇 is bounded if the subspaces are completely disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑥) + (normℎ‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘(𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑇‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢)))) | ||
Theorem | cdj3i 30146* | Two ways to express "𝐴 and 𝐵 are completely disjoint subspaces." (1) <=> (3) in Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢)))) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑇‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢)))) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑥) + (normℎ‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘(𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)))) ↔ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | mathbox 30147 |
(This theorem is a dummy placeholder for these guidelines. The label
of this theorem, "mathbox", is hard-coded into the Metamath
program to
identify the start of the mathbox section for web page generation.)
A "mathbox" is a user-contributed section that is maintained by its contributor independently from the main part of set.mm. For contributors: By making a contribution, you agree to release it into the public domain, according to the statement at the beginning of set.mm. Mathboxes are provided to help keep your work synchronized with changes in set.mm while allowing you to work independently without affecting other contributors. Even though in a sense your mathbox belongs to you, it is still part of the shared body of knowledge contained in set.mm, and occasionally other people may make maintenance edits to your mathbox for things like keeping it synchronized with the rest of set.mm, reducing proof lengths, moving your theorems to the main part of set.mm when needed, and fixing typos or other errors. If you want to preserve it the way you left it, you can keep a local copy or keep track of the GitHub commit number. Guidelines: 1. See conventions 28107 for our general style guidelines. For contributing via GitHub, see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md 28107. The Metamath program command "verify markup *" will check that you have followed many of of the conventions we use. 2. If at all possible, please use only nullary class constants for new definitions, for example as in df-div 11287. 3. Each $p and $a statement must be immediately preceded with the comment that will be shown on its web page description. The Metamath program "MM> WRITE SOURCE set.mm / REWRAP" command will take care of indentation conventions and line wrapping. 4. All mathbox content will be on public display and should hopefully reflect the overall quality of the website. 5. Mathboxes must be independent from one another (checked by "verify markup *"). If you need a theorem from another mathbox, typically it is moved to the main part of set.mm. New users should consult with more experienced users before doing this. 6. If a contributor is no longer active, we will continue the usual maintenance edits. As time goes on, often theorems will be moved to main or removed in favor of similar replacements. But we are also willing to maintain mathboxes in place, as work by others from years ago may form the foundation of future work; you could even argue that all of mathematics is like that. 7. For theorems of importance (for example, a Metamath 100 theorem or a dependency of one), we prefer to eventually move them out of mathboxes (although a mathbox is perfectly appropriate as proofs are being developed and refined). (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2007.) (Revised by the Metamath team, 9-Sep-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ 𝜑 | ||
Theorem | sa-abvi 30148 | A theorem about the universal class. Inference associated with bj-abv 34121 (which is proved from fewer axioms). (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 9-Dec-2008.) |
⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ V = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} | ||
Theorem | xfree 30149 | A partial converse to 19.9t 2195. (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 21-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | xfree2 30150 | A partial converse to 19.9t 2195. (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 21-Dec-2008.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | addltmulALT 30151 | A proof readability experiment for addltmul 11862. (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 30-Oct-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (2 < 𝐴 ∧ 2 < 𝐵)) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) < (𝐴 · 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | bian1d 30152 | Adding a superfluous conjunct in a biconditional. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Feb-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | or3di 30153 | Distributive law for disjunction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜏))) | ||
Theorem | or3dir 30154 | Distributive law for disjunction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∨ 𝜏) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜏) ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜏) ∧ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜏))) | ||
Theorem | 3o1cs 30155 | Deduction eliminating disjunct. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | 3o2cs 30156 | Deduction eliminating disjunct. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | 3o3cs 30157 | Deduction eliminating disjunct. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | sbc2iedf 30158* | Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | rspc2daf 30159* | Double restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | nelbOLD 30160* | Obsolete version of nelb 3268 as of 23-Jan-2024. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Nov-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≠ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | ralcom4f 30161* | Commutation of restricted and unrestricted universal quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Mar-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | rexcom4f 30162* | Commutation of restricted and unrestricted existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Mar-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | 19.9d2rf 30163 | A deduction version of one direction of 19.9 2196 with two variables. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Mar-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | 19.9d2r 30164* | A deduction version of one direction of 19.9 2196 with two variables. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | r19.29ffa 30165* | A commonly used pattern based on r19.29 3254, version with two restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Nov-2017.) |
⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | eqtrb 30166 | A transposition of equality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | opsbc2ie 30167* | Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution for ordered pairs. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑝 = 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑝 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑏][𝑥 / 𝑎]𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | opreu2reuALT 30168* | Correspondence between uniqueness of ordered pairs and double restricted existential uniqueness quantification. Alternate proof of one direction only, use opreu2reurex 6139 instead. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Jul-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝑝 = 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒) → ∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑) | ||
Syntax | w2reu 30169 | Syntax for double restricted existential uniqueness quantification. |
wff ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 | ||
Definition | df-2reu 30170 | Define the double restricted existential uniqueness quantifier. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | 2reucom 30171 | Double restricted existential uniqueness commutes. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑) | ||
Theorem | 2reu2rex1 30172 | Double restricted existential uniqueness implies double restricted existence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | 2reureurex 30173 | Double restricted existential uniqueness implies restricted existential uniqueness with restricted existence. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | 2reu2reu2 30174* | Double restricted existential uniqueness implies two nested restricted existential uniqueness. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | opreu2reu1 30175* | Equivalent definition of the double restricted existential uniqueness quantifier, using uniqueness of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑝 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜒) | ||
Theorem | sq2reunnltb 30176* | There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different positive integers iff the prime is of the form 4𝑘 + 1. Double restricted existential uniqueness variant of 2sqreunnltb 25965. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ , 𝑏 ∈ ℕ(𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | addsqnot2reu 30177* | For each complex number 𝐶, there does not uniquely exist two complex numbers 𝑎 and 𝑏, with 𝑏 squared and added to 𝑎 resulting in the given complex number 𝐶. Double restricted existential uniqueness variant of addsqn2reurex2 25949. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ , 𝑏 ∈ ℂ(𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | sbceqbidf 30178 | Equality theorem for class substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | sbcies 30179* | A special version of class substitution commonly used for structures. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐸‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ([(𝐸‘𝑤) / 𝑎]𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | moel 30180* | "At most one" element in a set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Jul-2018.) |
⊢ (∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | mo5f 30181* | Alternate definition of "at most one." (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Mar-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑖𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑖∀𝑗(([𝑖 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑗 / 𝑥]𝜑) → 𝑖 = 𝑗)) | ||
Theorem | nmo 30182* | Negation of "at most one". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Feb-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | reuxfrdf 30183* | Transfer existential uniqueness from a variable 𝑥 to another variable 𝑦 contained in expression 𝐴. Cf. reuxfrd 3738 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Apr-2017.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2017.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | rexunirn 30184* | Restricted existential quantification over the union of the range of a function. Cf. rexrn 6846 and eluni2 4836. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Sep-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ∪ ran 𝐹𝜑) | ||
Theorem | rmoxfrd 30185* | Transfer "at most one" restricted quantification from a variable 𝑥 to another variable 𝑦 contained in expression 𝐴. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Apr-2017.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | rmoun 30186 | "At most one" restricted existential quantifier for a union implies the same quantifier on both sets. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2023.) |
⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | rmounid 30187* | Case where an "at most one" restricted existential quantifier for a union is equivalent to such a quantifier for one of the sets. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | dmrab 30188* | Domain of a restricted class abstraction over a cartesian product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ dom {𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓} | ||
Theorem | difrab2 30189 | Difference of two restricted class abstractions. Compare with difrab 4276. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} | ||
Theorem | rabexgfGS 30190 | Separation Scheme in terms of a restricted class abstraction. To be removed in profit of Glauco's equivalent version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-May-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | rabsnel 30191* | Truth implied by equality of a restricted class abstraction and a singleton. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝐵} → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | rabeqsnd 30192* | Conditions for a restricted class abstraction to be a singleton, in deduction form. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑥 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝐵}) | ||
Theorem | foresf1o 30193* | From a surjective function, *choose* a subset of the domain, such that the restricted function is bijective. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Jan-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝐹 ↾ 𝑥):𝑥–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
Theorem | rabfodom 30194* | Domination relation for restricted abstract class builders, based on a surjective function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Jan-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒} ≼ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) | ||
Theorem | abrexdomjm 30195* | An indexed set is dominated by the indexing set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃*𝑥𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ≼ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | abrexdom2jm 30196* | An indexed set is dominated by the indexing set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵} ≼ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | abrexexd 30197* | Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-May-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | elabreximd 30198* | Class substitution in an image set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒 & ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦 = 𝐵}) → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | elabreximdv 30199* | Class substitution in an image set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦 = 𝐵}) → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | abrexss 30200* | A necessary condition for an image set to be a subset. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Feb-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} ⊆ 𝐶) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |