Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 319 of 449) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28623) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28624-30146) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30147-44804) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | breprexplema 31801* | Lemma for breprexp 31804 (induction step for weighted sums over representations) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ ((𝑆 + 1) · 𝑁)) & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (0..^(𝑆 + 1))) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐿‘𝑥)‘𝑦) ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑑 ∈ ((1...𝑁)(repr‘(𝑆 + 1))𝑀)∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^(𝑆 + 1))((𝐿‘𝑎)‘(𝑑‘𝑎)) = Σ𝑏 ∈ (1...𝑁)Σ𝑑 ∈ ((1...𝑁)(repr‘𝑆)(𝑀 − 𝑏))(∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑆)((𝐿‘𝑎)‘(𝑑‘𝑎)) · ((𝐿‘𝑆)‘𝑏))) | ||
Theorem | breprexplemb 31802 | Lemma for breprexp 31804 (closure) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:(0..^𝑆)⟶(ℂ ↑m ℕ)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (0..^𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐿‘𝑋)‘𝑌) ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | breprexplemc 31803* | Lemma for breprexp 31804 (induction step) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:(0..^𝑆)⟶(ℂ ↑m ℕ)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 + 1) ≤ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑇)Σ𝑏 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐿‘𝑎)‘𝑏) · (𝑍↑𝑏)) = Σ𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝑇 · 𝑁))Σ𝑑 ∈ ((1...𝑁)(repr‘𝑇)𝑚)(∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑇)((𝐿‘𝑎)‘(𝑑‘𝑎)) · (𝑍↑𝑚))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^(𝑇 + 1))Σ𝑏 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐿‘𝑎)‘𝑏) · (𝑍↑𝑏)) = Σ𝑚 ∈ (0...((𝑇 + 1) · 𝑁))Σ𝑑 ∈ ((1...𝑁)(repr‘(𝑇 + 1))𝑚)(∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^(𝑇 + 1))((𝐿‘𝑎)‘(𝑑‘𝑎)) · (𝑍↑𝑚))) | ||
Theorem | breprexp 31804* | Express the 𝑆 th power of the finite series in terms of the number of representations of integers 𝑚 as sums of 𝑆 terms. This is a general formulation which allows logarithmic weighting of the sums (see https://mathoverflow.net/questions/253246) and a mix of different smoothing functions taken into account in 𝐿. See breprexpnat 31805 for the simple case presented in the proposition of [Nathanson] p. 123. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:(0..^𝑆)⟶(ℂ ↑m ℕ)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑆)Σ𝑏 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐿‘𝑎)‘𝑏) · (𝑍↑𝑏)) = Σ𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝑆 · 𝑁))Σ𝑐 ∈ ((1...𝑁)(repr‘𝑆)𝑚)(∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑆)((𝐿‘𝑎)‘(𝑐‘𝑎)) · (𝑍↑𝑚))) | ||
Theorem | breprexpnat 31805* | Express the 𝑆 th power of the finite series in terms of the number of representations of integers 𝑚 as sums of 𝑆 terms of elements of 𝐴, bounded by 𝑁. Proposition of [Nathanson] p. 123. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑃 = Σ𝑏 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ (1...𝑁))(𝑍↑𝑏) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (♯‘((𝐴 ∩ (1...𝑁))(repr‘𝑆)𝑚)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃↑𝑆) = Σ𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝑆 · 𝑁))(𝑅 · (𝑍↑𝑚))) | ||
Syntax | cvts 31806 | The Vinogradov trigonometric sums. |
class vts | ||
Definition | df-vts 31807* | Define the Vinogradov trigonometric sums. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ vts = (𝑙 ∈ (ℂ ↑m ℕ), 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑎 ∈ (1...𝑛)((𝑙‘𝑎) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · (𝑎 · 𝑥)))))) | ||
Theorem | vtsval 31808* | Value of the Vinogradov trigonometric sums (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:ℕ⟶ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐿vts𝑁)‘𝑋) = Σ𝑎 ∈ (1...𝑁)((𝐿‘𝑎) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · (𝑎 · 𝑋))))) | ||
Theorem | vtscl 31809 | Closure of the Vinogradov trigonometric sums (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:ℕ⟶ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐿vts𝑁)‘𝑋) ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | vtsprod 31810* | Express the Vinogradov trigonometric sums to the power of 𝑆 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:(0..^𝑆)⟶(ℂ ↑m ℕ)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑆)(((𝐿‘𝑎)vts𝑁)‘𝑋) = Σ𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝑆 · 𝑁))Σ𝑐 ∈ ((1...𝑁)(repr‘𝑆)𝑚)(∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑆)((𝐿‘𝑎)‘(𝑐‘𝑎)) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · (𝑚 · 𝑋))))) | ||
Theorem | circlemeth 31811* | The Hardy, Littlewood and Ramanujan Circle Method, in a generic form, with different weighting / smoothing functions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:(0..^𝑆)⟶(ℂ ↑m ℕ)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑐 ∈ (ℕ(repr‘𝑆)𝑁)∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑆)((𝐿‘𝑎)‘(𝑐‘𝑎)) = ∫(0(,)1)(∏𝑎 ∈ (0..^𝑆)(((𝐿‘𝑎)vts𝑁)‘𝑥) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · (-𝑁 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥) | ||
Theorem | circlemethnat 31812* | The Hardy, Littlewood and Ramanujan Circle Method, Chapter 5.1 of [Nathanson] p. 123. This expresses 𝑅, the number of different ways a nonnegative integer 𝑁 can be represented as the sum of at most 𝑆 integers in the set 𝐴 as an integral of Vinogradov trigonometric sums. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑅 = (♯‘(𝐴(repr‘𝑆)𝑁)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((((𝟭‘ℕ)‘𝐴)vts𝑁)‘𝑥) & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 & ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ 𝑅 = ∫(0(,)1)((𝐹↑𝑆) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · (-𝑁 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥 | ||
Theorem | circlevma 31813* | The Circle Method, where the Vinogradov sums are weighted using the von Mangoldt function, as it appears as proposition 1.1 of [Helfgott] p. 5. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ (ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁)((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (Λ‘(𝑛‘2)))) = ∫(0(,)1)((((Λvts𝑁)‘𝑥)↑3) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · (-𝑁 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥) | ||
Theorem | circlemethhgt 31814* | The circle method, where the Vinogradov sums are weighted using the Von Mangoldt function and smoothed using functions 𝐻 and 𝐾. Statement 7.49 of [Helfgott] p. 69. At this point there is no further constraint on the smoothing functions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:ℕ⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ (ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁)(((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · (𝐻‘(𝑛‘0))) · (((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘1))) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘2)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘2))))) = ∫(0(,)1)(((((Λ ∘f · 𝐻)vts𝑁)‘𝑥) · ((((Λ ∘f · 𝐾)vts𝑁)‘𝑥)↑2)) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · (-𝑁 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥) | ||
Axiom | ax-hgt749 31815* | Statement 7.49 of [Helfgott] p. 70. For a sufficiently big odd 𝑁, this postulates the existence of smoothing functions ℎ (eta star) and 𝑘 (eta plus) such that the lower bound for the circle integral is big enough. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ ∀𝑛 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧} ((;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑛 → ∃ℎ ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m ℕ)∃𝑘 ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m ℕ)(∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝑘‘𝑚) ≤ (1._0_7_9_9_55) ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ (ℎ‘𝑚) ≤ (1._4_14) ∧ ((0._0_0_0_4_2_2_48) · (𝑛↑2)) ≤ ∫(0(,)1)(((((Λ ∘f · ℎ)vts𝑛)‘𝑥) · ((((Λ ∘f · 𝑘)vts𝑛)‘𝑥)↑2)) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · (-𝑛 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥)) | ||
Axiom | ax-ros335 31816 | Theorem 12. of [RosserSchoenfeld] p. 71. Theorem chpo1ubb 25985 states that the ψ function is bounded by a linear term; this axiom postulates an upper bound for that linear term. This is stated as an axiom until a formal proof can be provided. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ (ψ‘𝑥) < ((1._0_3_8_83) · 𝑥) | ||
Axiom | ax-ros336 31817 | Theorem 13. of [RosserSchoenfeld] p. 71. Theorem chpchtlim 25983 states that the ψ and θ function are asymtotic to each other; this axiom postulates an upper bound for their difference. This is stated as an axiom until a formal proof can be provided. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ((ψ‘𝑥) − (θ‘𝑥)) < ((1._4_2_62) · (√‘𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | hgt750lemc 31818* | An upper bound to the summatory function of the von Mangoldt function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(Λ‘𝑗) < ((1._0_3_8_83) · 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | hgt750lemd 31819* | An upper bound to the summatory function of the von Mangoldt function on non-primes. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑖 ∈ (((1...𝑁) ∖ ℙ) ∪ {2})(Λ‘𝑖) < ((1._4_2_63) · (√‘𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | hgt749d 31820* | A deduction version of ax-hgt749 31815. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃ℎ ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m ℕ)∃𝑘 ∈ ((0[,)+∞) ↑m ℕ)(∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝑘‘𝑚) ≤ (1._0_7_9_9_55) ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ (ℎ‘𝑚) ≤ (1._4_14) ∧ ((0._0_0_0_4_2_2_48) · (𝑁↑2)) ≤ ∫(0(,)1)(((((Λ ∘f · ℎ)vts𝑁)‘𝑥) · ((((Λ ∘f · 𝑘)vts𝑁)‘𝑥)↑2)) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · (-𝑁 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | logdivsqrle 31821 | Conditions for ((log x ) / ( sqrt 𝑥)) to be decreasing. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (exp‘2) ≤ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((log‘𝐵) / (√‘𝐵)) ≤ ((log‘𝐴) / (√‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | hgt750lem 31822 | Lemma for tgoldbachgtd 31833. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁) → ((7._3_48) · ((log‘𝑁) / (√‘𝑁))) < (0._0_0_0_4_2_2_48)) | ||
Theorem | hgt750lem2 31823 | Decimal multiplication galore! (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (3 · ((((1._0_7_9_9_55)↑2) · (1._4_14)) · ((1._4_2_63) · (1._0_3_8_83)))) < (7._3_48) | ||
Theorem | hgt750lemf 31824* | Lemma for the statement 7.50 of [Helfgott] p. 69. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑛‘0) ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑛‘1) ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑛‘2) ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐾‘𝑚) ≤ 𝑃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐻‘𝑚) ≤ 𝑄) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 (((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · (𝐻‘(𝑛‘0))) · (((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘1))) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘2)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘2))))) ≤ (((𝑃↑2) · 𝑄) · Σ𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (Λ‘(𝑛‘2)))))) | ||
Theorem | hgt750lemg 31825* | Lemma for the statement 7.50 of [Helfgott] p. 69. Applying a permutation 𝑇 to the three factors of a product does not change the result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ↦ (𝑐 ∘ 𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇:(0..^3)–1-1-onto→(0..^3)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁:(0..^3)⟶ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿:ℕ⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐿‘((𝐹‘𝑁)‘0)) · ((𝐿‘((𝐹‘𝑁)‘1)) · (𝐿‘((𝐹‘𝑁)‘2)))) = ((𝐿‘(𝑁‘0)) · ((𝐿‘(𝑁‘1)) · (𝐿‘(𝑁‘2))))) | ||
Theorem | oddprm2 31826* | Two ways to write the set of odd primes. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧} ⇒ ⊢ (ℙ ∖ {2}) = (𝑂 ∩ ℙ) | ||
Theorem | hgt750lemb 31827* | An upper bound on the contribution of the non-prime terms in the Statement 7.50 of [Helfgott] p. 69. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 2 ≤ 𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑐 ∈ (ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁) ∣ ¬ (𝑐‘0) ∈ (𝑂 ∩ ℙ)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (Λ‘(𝑛‘2)))) ≤ ((log‘𝑁) · (Σ𝑖 ∈ (((1...𝑁) ∖ ℙ) ∪ {2})(Λ‘𝑖) · Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(Λ‘𝑗)))) | ||
Theorem | hgt750lema 31828* | An upper bound on the contribution of the non-prime terms in the Statement 7.50 of [Helfgott] p. 69. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 2 ≤ 𝑁) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑐 ∈ (ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁) ∣ ¬ (𝑐‘0) ∈ (𝑂 ∩ ℙ)} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑑 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁) ∣ ¬ (𝑐‘𝑎) ∈ (𝑂 ∩ ℙ)} ↦ (𝑑 ∘ if(𝑎 = 0, ( I ↾ (0..^3)), ((pmTrsp‘(0..^3))‘{𝑎, 0})))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ ((ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁) ∖ ((𝑂 ∩ ℙ)(repr‘3)𝑁))((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (Λ‘(𝑛‘2)))) ≤ (3 · Σ𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (Λ‘(𝑛‘2)))))) | ||
Theorem | hgt750leme 31829* | An upper bound on the contribution of the non-prime terms in the Statement 7.50 of [Helfgott] p. 69. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐾‘𝑚) ≤ (1._0_7_9_9_55)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐻‘𝑚) ≤ (1._4_14)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑛 ∈ ((ℕ(repr‘3)𝑁) ∖ ((𝑂 ∩ ℙ)(repr‘3)𝑁))(((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · (𝐻‘(𝑛‘0))) · (((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘1))) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘2)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘2))))) ≤ (((7._3_48) · ((log‘𝑁) / (√‘𝑁))) · (𝑁↑2))) | ||
Theorem | tgoldbachgnn 31830* | Lemma for tgoldbachgtd 31833. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | tgoldbachgtde 31831* | Lemma for tgoldbachgtd 31833. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐾‘𝑚) ≤ (1._0_7_9_9_55)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐻‘𝑚) ≤ (1._4_14)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((0._0_0_0_4_2_2_48) · (𝑁↑2)) ≤ ∫(0(,)1)(((((Λ ∘f · 𝐻)vts𝑁)‘𝑥) · ((((Λ ∘f · 𝐾)vts𝑁)‘𝑥)↑2)) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · (-𝑁 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < Σ𝑛 ∈ ((𝑂 ∩ ℙ)(repr‘3)𝑁)(((Λ‘(𝑛‘0)) · (𝐻‘(𝑛‘0))) · (((Λ‘(𝑛‘1)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘1))) · ((Λ‘(𝑛‘2)) · (𝐾‘(𝑛‘2)))))) | ||
Theorem | tgoldbachgtda 31832* | Lemma for tgoldbachgtd 31833. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:ℕ⟶(0[,)+∞)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐾‘𝑚) ≤ (1._0_7_9_9_55)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐻‘𝑚) ≤ (1._4_14)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((0._0_0_0_4_2_2_48) · (𝑁↑2)) ≤ ∫(0(,)1)(((((Λ ∘f · 𝐻)vts𝑁)‘𝑥) · ((((Λ ∘f · 𝐾)vts𝑁)‘𝑥)↑2)) · (exp‘((i · (2 · π)) · (-𝑁 · 𝑥)))) d𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (♯‘((𝑂 ∩ ℙ)(repr‘3)𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | tgoldbachgtd 31833* | Odd integers greater than (;10↑;27) have at least a representation as a sum of three odd primes. Final statement in section 7.4 of [Helfgott] p. 70 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (;10↑;27) ≤ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (♯‘((𝑂 ∩ ℙ)(repr‘3)𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | tgoldbachgt 31834* | Odd integers greater than (;10↑;27) have at least a representation as a sum of three odd primes. Final statement in section 7.4 of [Helfgott] p. 70 , expressed using the set 𝐺 of odd numbers which can be written as a sum of three odd primes. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧} & ⊢ 𝐺 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ ((𝑝 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑂) ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))} ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝑚 ≤ (;10↑;27) ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑂 (𝑚 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐺)) | ||
This definition has been superseded by DimTarskiG≥ and is no longer needed in the main part of set.mm. It is only kept here for reference. | ||
Syntax | cstrkg2d 31835 | Extends class notation with the class of geometries fulfilling the planarity axioms. |
class TarskiG2D | ||
Definition | df-trkg2d 31836* | Define the class of geometries fulfilling the lower dimension axiom, Axiom A8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 12, and the upper dimension axiom, Axiom A9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 13, for dimension 2. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ TarskiG2D = {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(dist‘𝑓) / 𝑑][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑝 ((((𝑥𝑑𝑢) = (𝑥𝑑𝑣) ∧ (𝑦𝑑𝑢) = (𝑦𝑑𝑣) ∧ (𝑧𝑑𝑢) = (𝑧𝑑𝑣)) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣) → (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))))} | ||
Theorem | istrkg2d 31837* | Property of fulfilling dimension 2 axiom. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-May-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG2D ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 ((((𝑥 − 𝑢) = (𝑥 − 𝑣) ∧ (𝑦 − 𝑢) = (𝑦 − 𝑣) ∧ (𝑧 − 𝑢) = (𝑧 − 𝑣)) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣) → (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧)))))) | ||
Theorem | axtglowdim2ALTV 31838* | Alternate version of axtglowdim2 26184. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-May-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG2D) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | axtgupdim2ALTV 31839 | Alternate version of axtgupdim2 26185. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-May-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑈) = (𝑋 − 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑈) = (𝑌 − 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 − 𝑈) = (𝑍 − 𝑉)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG2D) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))) | ||
Syntax | cafs 31840 | Declare the syntax for the outer five segment configuration. |
class AFS | ||
Definition | df-afs 31841* | The outer five segment configuration is an abbreviation for the conditions of the Five Segment Axiom (axtg5seg 26179). See df-ofs 33342. Definition 2.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 28. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ AFS = (𝑔 ∈ TarskiG ↦ {〈𝑒, 𝑓〉 ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑝][(dist‘𝑔) / ℎ][(Itv‘𝑔) / 𝑖]∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑒 = 〈〈𝑎, 𝑏〉, 〈𝑐, 𝑑〉〉 ∧ 𝑓 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉〉 ∧ ((𝑏 ∈ (𝑎𝑖𝑐) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧)) ∧ ((𝑎ℎ𝑏) = (𝑥ℎ𝑦) ∧ (𝑏ℎ𝑐) = (𝑦ℎ𝑧)) ∧ ((𝑎ℎ𝑑) = (𝑥ℎ𝑤) ∧ (𝑏ℎ𝑑) = (𝑦ℎ𝑤))))}) | ||
Theorem | afsval 31842* | Value of the AFS relation for a given geometry structure. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (AFS‘𝐺) = {〈𝑒, 𝑓〉 ∣ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑒 = 〈〈𝑎, 𝑏〉, 〈𝑐, 𝑑〉〉 ∧ 𝑓 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉〉 ∧ ((𝑏 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑐) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧)) ∧ ((𝑎 − 𝑏) = (𝑥 − 𝑦) ∧ (𝑏 − 𝑐) = (𝑦 − 𝑧)) ∧ ((𝑎 − 𝑑) = (𝑥 − 𝑤) ∧ (𝑏 − 𝑑) = (𝑦 − 𝑤))))}) | ||
Theorem | brafs 31843 | Binary relation form of the outer five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (AFS‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉𝑂〈〈𝑋, 𝑌〉, 〈𝑍, 𝑊〉〉 ↔ ((𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝑋 − 𝑌) ∧ (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝑌 − 𝑍)) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐷) = (𝑋 − 𝑊) ∧ (𝐵 − 𝐷) = (𝑌 − 𝑊))))) | ||
Theorem | tg5segofs 31844 | Rephrase axtg5seg 26179 using the outer five segment predicate. Theorem 2.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 28. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (AFS‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉𝑂〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐻, 𝐼〉〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐷) = (𝐻 − 𝐼)) | ||
Syntax | clpad 31845 | Extend class notation with the leftpad function. |
class leftpad | ||
Definition | df-lpad 31846* | Define the leftpad function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ leftpad = (𝑐 ∈ V, 𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑙 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((0..^(𝑙 − (♯‘𝑤))) × {𝑐}) ++ 𝑤))) | ||
Theorem | lpadval 31847 | Value of the leftpad function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 leftpad 𝑊)‘𝐿) = (((0..^(𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊))) × {𝐶}) ++ 𝑊)) | ||
Theorem | lpadlem1 31848 | Lemma for the leftpad theorems. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((0..^(𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊))) × {𝐶}) ∈ Word 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | lpadlem3 31849 | Lemma for lpadlen1 31850 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ (♯‘𝑊)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((0..^(𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊))) × {𝐶}) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | lpadlen1 31850 | Length of a left-padded word, in the case the length of the given word 𝑊 is at least the desired length. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ (♯‘𝑊)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘((𝐶 leftpad 𝑊)‘𝐿)) = (♯‘𝑊)) | ||
Theorem | lpadlem2 31851 | Lemma for the leftpad theorems. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑊) ≤ 𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘((0..^(𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊))) × {𝐶})) = (𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊))) | ||
Theorem | lpadlen2 31852 | Length of a left-padded word, in the case the given word 𝑊 is shorter than the desired length. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑊) ≤ 𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘((𝐶 leftpad 𝑊)‘𝐿)) = 𝐿) | ||
Theorem | lpadmax 31853 | Length of a left-padded word, in the general case, expressed with an if statement. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘((𝐶 leftpad 𝑊)‘𝐿)) = if(𝐿 ≤ (♯‘𝑊), (♯‘𝑊), 𝐿)) | ||
Theorem | lpadleft 31854 | The contents of prefix of a left-padded word is always the letter 𝐶. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐶 leftpad 𝑊)‘𝐿)‘𝑁) = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | lpadright 31855 | The suffix of a left-padded word the original word 𝑊. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = if(𝐿 ≤ (♯‘𝑊), 0, (𝐿 − (♯‘𝑊)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐶 leftpad 𝑊)‘𝐿)‘(𝑁 + 𝑀)) = (𝑊‘𝑁)) | ||
Note: On 4-Sep-2016 and after, 745 unused theorems were deleted from this mathbox, and 359 theorems used only once or twice were merged into their referencing theorems. The originals can be recovered from set.mm versions prior to this date. | ||
Syntax | w-bnj17 31856 | Extend wff notation with the 4-way conjunction. (New usage is discouraged.) |
wff (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) | ||
Definition | df-bnj17 31857 | Define the 4-way conjunction. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃)) | ||
Syntax | c-bnj14 31858 | Extend class notation with the function giving: the class of all elements of 𝐴 that are "smaller" than 𝑋 according to 𝑅. (New usage is discouraged.) |
class pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) | ||
Definition | df-bnj14 31859* | Define the function giving: the class of all elements of 𝐴 that are "smaller" than 𝑋 according to 𝑅. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑋} | ||
Syntax | w-bnj13 31860 | Extend wff notation with the following predicate: 𝑅 is set-like on 𝐴. (New usage is discouraged.) |
wff 𝑅 Se 𝐴 | ||
Definition | df-bnj13 31861* | Define the following predicate: 𝑅 is set-like on 𝐴. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V) | ||
Syntax | w-bnj15 31862 | Extend wff notation with the following predicate: 𝑅 is both well-founded and set-like on 𝐴. (New usage is discouraged.) |
wff 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 | ||
Definition | df-bnj15 31863 | Define the following predicate: 𝑅 is both well-founded and set-like on 𝐴. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴)) | ||
Syntax | c-bnj18 31864 | Extend class notation with the function giving: the transitive closure of 𝑋 in 𝐴 by 𝑅. (New usage is discouraged.) |
class trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) | ||
Definition | df-bnj18 31865* | Define the function giving: the transitive closure of 𝑋 in 𝐴 by 𝑅. This definition has been designed for facilitating verification that it is eliminable and that the $d restrictions are sound and complete. For a more readable definition see bnj882 32098. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ 𝑓 ∈ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅})(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))}∪ 𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑓(𝑓‘𝑖) | ||
Syntax | w-bnj19 31866 | Extend wff notation with the following predicate: 𝐵 is transitive for 𝐴 and 𝑅. (New usage is discouraged.) |
wff TrFo(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) | ||
Definition | df-bnj19 31867* | Define the following predicate: 𝐵 is transitive for 𝐴 and 𝑅. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( TrFo(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | bnj170 31868 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | bnj240 31869 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜓′) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜒′) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜓′ ∧ 𝜒′)) | ||
Theorem | bnj248 31870 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | bnj250 31871 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | bnj251 31872 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))) | ||
Theorem | bnj252 31873 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | bnj253 31874 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | bnj255 31875 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | bnj256 31876 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | bnj257 31877 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | bnj258 31878 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | bnj268 31879 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | bnj290 31880 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | bnj291 31881 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | bnj312 31882 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | bnj334 31883 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | bnj345 31884 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | bnj422 31885 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | bnj432 31886 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | bnj446 31887 | ∧-manipulation. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | bnj23 31888* | First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑦 → [𝑤 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | bnj31 31889 | First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | bnj62 31890* | First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝑥 Fn 𝐴 ↔ 𝑧 Fn 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | bnj89 31891* | First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ([𝑍 / 𝑦]∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥[𝑍 / 𝑦]𝜑) | ||
Theorem | bnj90 31892* | First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝑌 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ([𝑌 / 𝑥]𝑧 Fn 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 Fn 𝑌) | ||
Theorem | bnj101 31893 | First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜓 | ||
Theorem | bnj105 31894 | First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 1o ∈ V | ||
Theorem | bnj115 31895 | First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜂 ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 (𝜏 → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ ∀𝑛((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | bnj132 31896* | First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 → ∃𝑥𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | bnj133 31897 | First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜒) | ||
Theorem | bnj156 31898 | First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜁0 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)) & ⊢ (𝜁1 ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜁0) & ⊢ (𝜑1 ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜑′) & ⊢ (𝜓1 ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜓′) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜁1 ↔ (𝑔 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑1 ∧ 𝜓1)) | ||
Theorem | bnj158 31899* | First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 → ∃𝑝 ∈ ω 𝑚 = suc 𝑝) | ||
Theorem | bnj168 31900* | First-order logic and set theory. Revised to remove dependence on ax-reg 9045. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Revised by NM, 21-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑛 ≠ 1o ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷) → ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |