P. 347 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 34601-34700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cdlemefr32snb 34601*	Show closure of ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdlemefr29bpre0N 34602*	TODO fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊))) ↔ 𝑧 = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁))
Theorem	cdlemefr29clN 34603*	Show closure of the unique element in cdleme29c 34572. TODO fix comment. TODO Not needed? (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑂 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdleme43frv1snN 34604*	Value of ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 when ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 30-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 = 𝑋)
Theorem	cdlemefr32fvaN 34605*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Value of 𝐹 at an atom not under 𝑊. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑥⦌𝑂 = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdlemefr32fva1 34606*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdlemefr31fv1 34607*	Value of (𝐹‘𝑅) when ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). TODO This may be useful for shortening others that now use riotasv 33153 3d . TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 30-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = 𝑋)
Theorem	cdlemefs29pre00N 34608	FIX COMMENT. TODO: see if this is the optimal utility theorem using lhpmat 34224. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) → (((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅) ↔ (¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅)))
Theorem	cdlemefs27cl 34609*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Closure of 𝑁. TODO FIX COMMENT This is the start of a re-proof of cdleme27cl 34562 etc. with the 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) condition (so as to not have the 𝐶 hypothesis). (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑢 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → 𝑁 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdlemefs32sn1aw 34610*	Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is an atom not under 𝑊 when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdlemefs32snb 34611*	Show closure of ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdlemefs29bpre0N 34612*	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊))) ↔ 𝑧 = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁))
Theorem	cdlemefs29bpre1N 34613*	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdlemefs29cpre1N 34614*	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdlemefs29clN 34615*	Show closure of the unique element in cdleme29c 34572. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑅) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑅 ∧ 𝑊))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑂 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdleme43fsv1snlem 34616*	Value of ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 30-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑉))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 = 𝑍)
Theorem	cdleme43fsv1sn 34617*	Value of ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 30-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 = 𝑍)
Theorem	cdlemefs32fvaN 34618*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Value of 𝐹 at an atom not under 𝑊. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: consolidate uses of lhpmat 34224 here and elsewhere, and presence/absence of 𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) term. Also, why can proof be shortened with cdleme27cl 34562? What is difference from cdlemefs27cl 34609? (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑥⦌𝑂 = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdlemefs32fva1 34619*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdlemefs31fv1 34620*	Value of (𝐹‘𝑅) when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). TODO This may be useful for shortening others that now use riotasv 33153 3d . TODO: FIX COMMENT. ***END OF VALUE AT ATOM STUFF TO REPLACE ONES BELOW*** "cdleme3xsn1aw" decreased using "cdlemefs32sn1aw" "cdleme32sn1aw" decreased from 3302 to 36 using "cdlemefs32sn1aw". "cdleme32sn2aw" decreased from 1687 to 26 using "cdlemefr32sn2aw". "cdleme32snaw" decreased from 376 to 375 using "cdlemefs32sn1aw". "cdleme32snaw" decreased from 375 to 368 using "cdlemefr32sn2aw". "cdleme35sn3a" decreased from 547 to 523 using "cdleme43frv1sn". (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = 𝑍)
Theorem	cdlemefr44 34621*	Value of f(r) when r is an atom not under pq, using more compact hypotheses. TODO: eliminate and use cdlemefr45 instead? TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑡⦌𝐷)
Theorem	cdlemefs44 34622*	Value of fs(r) when r is an atom under pq and s is any atom not under pq, using more compact hypotheses. TODO: eliminate and use cdlemefs45 34625 instead TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌⦋𝑆 / 𝑡⦌𝐸)
Theorem	cdlemefr45 34623*	Value of f(r) when r is an atom not under pq, using very compact hypotheses. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑡⦌𝐷)
Theorem	cdlemefr45e 34624*	Explicit expansion of cdlemefr45 34623. TODO: use to shorten cdlemefr45 34623 uses? TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdlemefs45 34625*	Value of fs(r) when r is an atom under pq and s is any atom not under pq, using very compact hypotheses. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌⦋𝑆 / 𝑡⦌𝐸)
Theorem	cdlemefs45ee 34626*	Explicit expansion of cdlemefs45 34625. TODO: use to shorten cdlemefs45 34625 uses? Should ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) be assigned to a hypothesis letter? TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdlemefs45eN 34627*	Explicit expansion of cdlemefs45 34625. TODO: use to shorten cdlemefs45 34625 uses? TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑆) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdleme32sn1awN 34628*	Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is an atom not under 𝑊 when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme41sn3a 34629*	Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is under 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 when 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	cdleme32sn2awN 34630*	Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is an atom not under 𝑊 when ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme32snaw 34631*	Show that ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 is an atom not under 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊))) → (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme32snb 34632*	Show closure of ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊))) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdleme32fva 34633*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. Value of 𝐹 at an atom not under 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑥⦌𝑂 = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme32fva1 34634*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme32fvaw 34635*	Show that (𝐹‘𝑅) is an atom not under 𝑊 when 𝑅 is an atom not under 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐹‘𝑅) ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme32fvcl 34636*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. Closure of the function 𝐹. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdleme32a 34637*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme32b 34638*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)) → (𝐹‘𝑌) = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme32c 34639*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌))
Theorem	cdleme32d 34640*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌))
Theorem	cdleme32e 34641*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌))
Theorem	cdleme32f 34642*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌))
Theorem	cdleme32le 34643*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑌))
Theorem	cdleme35a 34644	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹 ∨ 𝑈) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈))
Theorem	cdleme35fnpq 34645	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ¬ 𝐹 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	cdleme35b 34646	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)))
Theorem	cdleme35c 34647	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑄 ∨ 𝐹) = (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme35d 34648	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ((𝑄 ∨ 𝐹) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme35e 34649	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝐹) ∧ 𝑊)) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	cdleme35f 34650	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
Theorem	cdleme35g 34651	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ((𝐹 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝐹) ∧ 𝑊))) = 𝑅)
Theorem	cdleme35h 34652	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one outside of 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺)) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)
Theorem	cdleme35h2 34653	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one outside of 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐺)
Theorem	cdleme35sn2aw 34654*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one outside of 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line case; compare cdleme32sn2awN 34630. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme35sn3a 34655*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ¬ ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	cdleme36a 34656	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑡 ∨ 𝐸))
Theorem	cdleme36m 34657	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐶) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)
Theorem	cdleme37m 34658	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝐶 = 𝐺)
Theorem	cdleme38m 34659	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝑅 = 𝑆)
Theorem	cdleme38n 34660	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO shorter if proved directly from cdleme36m 34657 and cdleme37m 34658? (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐺)
Theorem	cdleme39a 34661	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. 𝐸, 𝑌, 𝐺, 𝑍 serve as f(t), f(u), ft(𝑅), ft(𝑆). Put hypotheses of cdleme38n 34660 in convention of cdleme32sn1awN 34628. TODO see if this hypothesis conversion would be better if done earlier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝐸) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊))) → 𝐺 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))))
Theorem	cdleme39n 34662	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. 𝐸, 𝑌, 𝐺, 𝑍 serve as f(t), f(u), ft(𝑅), ft(𝑆). Put hypotheses of cdleme38n 34660 in convention of cdleme32sn1awN 34628. TODO see if this hypothesis conversion would be better if done earlier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑌 ∨ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) ∧ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝐺 ≠ 𝑍)
Theorem	cdleme40m 34663*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT Use proof idea from cdleme32sn1awN 34628. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑌))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ 𝐹)
Theorem	cdleme40n 34664*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(x) is one-to-one on 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO get rid of '.<' class? (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝑌))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑧 = 𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝑂, < )    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑧 = 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑢⦌𝑉)
Theorem	cdleme40v 34665*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Change bound variables in ⦋𝑆 / 𝑢⦌𝑉 (but we use ⦋𝑅 / 𝑢⦌𝑉 for convenience since we have its hypotheses available) . (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((𝑣 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑣 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑧 = 𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = if(𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝑂, 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 = ⦋𝑅 / 𝑢⦌𝑉)
Theorem	cdleme40w 34666*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Apply cdleme40v 34665 bound variable change to ⦋𝑆 / 𝑢⦌𝑉. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑊)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme42a 34667	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 3-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42c 34668	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Match ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) → ¬ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ≤ 𝑊)
Theorem	cdleme42d 34669	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Match (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑅 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑊)) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme41sn3aw 34670*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(r) is different on and off the 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme41sn4aw 34671*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(r) is for on and off 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 line. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme41snaw 34672*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(r) is for combined cases; compare cdleme32snaw 34631. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) → ⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ≠ ⦋𝑆 / 𝑠⦌𝑁)
Theorem	cdleme41fva11 34673*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Show that f(r) is one-to-one for r in W (r an atom not under w). TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) → (𝐹‘𝑅) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑆))
Theorem	cdleme42b 34674*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑅 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme42e 34675*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑉)) = (⦋𝑅 / 𝑠⦌𝑁 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme42f 34676*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑉)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42g 34677*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42h 34678*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑆) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42i 34679*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42k 34680*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Since F ' S =/= F'R when S =/= R (i.e. 1-1); then ( ( F ' R ) .\/ ( F ' S ) ) is 2-dim therefore = ( ( F ' R ) .\/ V ) by cdleme42i 34679 and ps-1 33671 TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42ke 34681*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Remove 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆 condition. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊))) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42keg 34682*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Remove 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 condition. TODO: FIX COMMENT. TODO: Use instead of cdleme42ke 34681 and even combine with it? (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊))) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ 𝑉))
Theorem	cdleme42mN 34683*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT . f preserves join: f(r ∨ s) = f(r) ∨ s, p. 115 10th line from bottom. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊))) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)))
Theorem	cdleme42mgN 34684*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT . f preserves join: f(r ∨ s) = f(r) ∨ s, p. 115 10th line from bottom. TODO: Use instead of cdleme42mN 34683? Combine with cdleme42mN 34683? (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑠) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐸 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), 𝐼, 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (𝑁 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊))) → (𝐹‘(𝑅 ∨ 𝑆)) = ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∨ (𝐹‘𝑆)))
Theorem	cdleme43aN 34685	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT p. 115 penultimate line: g(f(r)) = (p v q) ^ (g(s) v v1). (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝐷 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ 𝑉)))
Theorem	cdleme43bN 34686	Lemma for Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. g(s) is an atom not under w. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝐷 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐷 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐷 ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme43cN 34687	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT p. 115 last line: r v g(s) = r v v2. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝐷 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑌))
Theorem	cdleme43dN 34688	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: FIX COMMENT p. 116 2nd line: f(r) v s = f(r) v f(g(s)). (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝐷 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑍 ∨ 𝑆) = (𝑍 ∨ 𝐸))
Theorem	cdleme46f2g2 34689	Conversion for 𝐺 to reuse 𝐹 theorems. TODO FIX COMMENT. TODO What other conversion theorems would be reused? e.g. cdlemeg46nlpq 34713? Find other hlatjcom 33562 uses giving 𝑄 ∨ 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cdleme46f2g1 34690	Conversion for 𝐺 to reuse 𝐹 theorems. TODO FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑃))))
Theorem	cdleme17d2 34691*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 114, first part of 4th paragraph. 𝐹, 𝐺 represent f(s), fs(p) respectively. We show, in their notation, fs(p)=q. TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄)
Theorem	cdleme17d3 34692*	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄)
Theorem	cdleme17d4 34693*	TODO: FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄)
Theorem	cdleme17d 34694*	Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 114, first part of 4th paragraph. We show, in their notation, fs(p)=q. TODO FIX COMMENT. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑄)
Theorem	cdleme48fv 34695*	Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: Can this replace uses of cdleme32a 34637? TODO: Can this be used to help prove the 𝑅 or 𝑆 case where 𝑋 is an atom? (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = ((𝐹‘𝑆) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme48fvg 34696*	Remove 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 condition in cdleme48fv 34695. TODO: Can this replace uses of cdleme32a 34637? TODO: Can this be used to help prove the 𝑅 or 𝑆 case where 𝑋 is an atom? TODO: Can this be proved more directly by eliminating 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 in earlier theorems? Should this replace uses of cdleme48fv 34695? (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = ((𝐹‘𝑆) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)))
Theorem	cdleme46fvaw 34697*	Show that (𝐹‘𝑅) is an atom not under 𝑊 when 𝑅 is an atom not under 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝐹‘𝑅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐹‘𝑅) ≤ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme48bw 34698*	TODO: fix comment. TODO: Remove unnecessary 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 from cdleme48bw 34698 cdlemeg46c 34709 cdlemeg46fvaw 34712 cdlemeg46rgv 34724 cdlemeg46gfv 34726? cdleme48d 34731? and possibly others they affect. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → ¬ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≤ 𝑊)
Theorem	cdleme48b 34699*	TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑋)) → ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑊) = (𝑋 ∧ 𝑊))
Theorem	cdleme46frvlpq 34700*	Show that (𝐹‘𝑆) is not under 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 when 𝑆 isn't. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑡 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∨ ((𝑠 ∨ 𝑡) ∧ 𝑊)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑠 ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)) = 𝑥) → 𝑧 = (if(𝑠 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄), (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑦 = 𝐸)), ⦋𝑠 / 𝑡⦌𝐷) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑊)))), 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ¬ (𝐹‘𝑆) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))