Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 348 of 449) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28623) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28624-30146) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30147-44804) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | wl-ax11-lem3 34701* | Lemma. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 30-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑢 𝑢 = 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | wl-ax11-lem4 34702* | Lemma. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 30-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(∀𝑢 𝑢 = 𝑦 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | wl-ax11-lem5 34703 | Lemma. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 30-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ (∀𝑢 𝑢 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑢[𝑢 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | wl-ax11-lem6 34704* | Lemma. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 30-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ ((∀𝑢 𝑢 = 𝑦 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (∀𝑢∀𝑥[𝑢 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | wl-ax11-lem7 34705 | Lemma. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 30-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥(¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | wl-ax11-lem8 34706* | Lemma. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 30-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ ((∀𝑢 𝑢 = 𝑦 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (∀𝑢∀𝑥[𝑢 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | wl-ax11-lem9 34707 | The easy part when 𝑥 coincides with 𝑦. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 30-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | wl-ax11-lem10 34708* | We now have prepared everything. The unwanted variable 𝑢 is just in one place left. pm2.61 193 can be used in conjunction with wl-ax11-lem9 34707 to eliminate the second antecedent. Missing is something along the lines of ax-6 1961, so we could remove the first antecedent. But the Metamath axioms cannot accomplish this. Such a rule must reside one abstraction level higher than all others: It says that a distinctor implies a distinct variable condition on its contained setvar. This is only needed if such conditions are required, as ax-11v does. The result of this study is for me, that you cannot introduce a setvar capturing this condition, and hope to eliminate it later. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 30-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑢 → (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑))) | ||
Theorem | wl-clabv 34709* |
Variant of df-clab 2800, where the element 𝑥 is required to be
disjoint from the class it is taken from. This restriction meets
similar ones found in other definitions and axioms like ax-ext 2793,
df-clel 2893 and df-cleq 2814. 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 with 𝐴 depending on 𝑥 can
be the source of side effects, that you rather want to be aware of. So
here we eliminate one possible way of letting this slip in instead.
An expression 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 with 𝑥, 𝐴 not disjoint, is now only introduced either via ax-8 2107, ax-9 2115, or df-clel 2893. Theorem cleljust 2114 shows that a possible choice does not matter. The original df-clab 2800 can be rederived, see wl-dfclab 34710. In an implementation this theorem is the only user of df-clab. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) Element and class are disjoint. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 31-May-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑) | ||
Theorem | wl-dfclab 34710 | Rederive df-clab 2800 from wl-clabv 34709. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 31-May-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑) | ||
Theorem | wl-clabtv 34711* | Using class abstraction in a context, requiring 𝑥 and 𝜑 disjoint, but based on fewer axioms than wl-clabt 34712. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 29-May-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 → 𝜓)}) | ||
Theorem | wl-clabt 34712 | Using class abstraction in a context. For a version based on fewer axioms see wl-clabtv 34711. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 29-May-2023.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 → 𝜓)}) | ||
Syntax | wl-ral 34713 | Redefine the restricted universal quantifier context to avoid overloading and syntax check errors in mmj2. This operator is to be distinguished from ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 with a similiar semantics, but using 𝑥 as a formal parameter rather than assuming true elementhood. |
wff ∀(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 | ||
Syntax | wl-rex 34714 | Redefine the restricted existential quantifier context to avoid overloading and syntax check errors in mmj2. This operator is to be distinguished from ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 with a similiar semantics, but using 𝑥 as a formal parameter rather than assuming true elementhood. |
wff ∃(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 | ||
Syntax | wl-rmo 34715 | Redefine the restricted "at most one" quantifier context to avoid overloading and syntax check errors in mmj2. This operator is to be distinguished from ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 with a similiar semantics, but using 𝑥 as a formal parameter rather than assuming true elementhood. |
wff ∃*(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 | ||
Syntax | wl-reu 34716 | Redefine the restricted existential uniqueness context to avoid overloading and syntax check errors in mmj2. This operator is to be distinguished from ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 with a similiar semantics, but using 𝑥 as a formal parameter rather than assuming true elementhood. |
wff ∃!(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 | ||
Syntax | wl-crab 34717 | Redefine extended class notation to include the restricted class abstraction (class builder). |
class {𝑥 : 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} | ||
Definition | df-wl-ral 34718* |
The definiens of df-ral 3143, ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) is a short and
simple expression, but has a severe downside: It allows for two
substantially different interpretations. One, and this is the common
case, wants this expression to denote that 𝜑 holds for all elements
of 𝐴. To this end, 𝑥 must
not be free in 𝐴, though .
Should instead 𝐴 vary with 𝑥, then we rather focus on
those
𝑥, that happen to be an element of
their respective 𝐴(𝑥).
Such interpretation is rare, but must nevertheless be considered in
design and comments.
In addition, many want definitions be designed to express just a single idea, not many. Our definition here introduces a dummy variable 𝑦, disjoint from all other variables, to describe an element in 𝐴. It lets 𝑥 appear as a formal parameter with no connection to 𝐴, but occurrences in 𝜑 are still honored. The resulting subexpression ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) is [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 in disguise (see wl-dfralsb 34719). If 𝑥 is not free in 𝐴, a simplification is possible ( see wl-dfralf 34721, wl-dfralv 34723). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.) Isolate x from A, idea of Mario Carneiro. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 21-May-2023.) |
⊢ (∀(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))) | ||
Theorem | wl-dfralsb 34719* | An alternate definition of restricted universal quantification (df-wl-ral 34718) using substitution. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 25-May-2023.) |
⊢ (∀(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | wl-dfralflem 34720* | Lemma for wl-dfralf 34721 and wl-dfralv . (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 23-May-2023.) |
⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | wl-dfralf 34721 | Restricted universal quantification (df-wl-ral 34718) allows a simplification, if we can assume all appearences of 𝑥 in 𝐴 are bounded. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 23-May-2023.) |
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (∀(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))) | ||
Theorem | wl-dfralfi 34722 | Restricted universal quantification (df-wl-ral 34718) allows allows a simplification, if we can assume all occurrences of 𝑥 in 𝐴 are bounded. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 26-May-2023.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (∀(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | wl-dfralv 34723* | Alternate definition of restricted universal quantification (df-wl-ral ) when 𝑥 and 𝐴 are disjoint. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 23-May-2023.) |
⊢ (∀(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | wl-rgen 34724* | Generalization rule for restricted quantification. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 10-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ ∀(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 | ||
Theorem | wl-rgenw 34725 | Generalization rule for restricted quantification. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 10-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ ∀(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 | ||
Theorem | wl-rgen2w 34726 | Generalization rule for restricted quantification. Note that 𝑥 and 𝑦 needn't be distinct. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 10-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ ∀(𝑥 : 𝐴)∀(𝑦 : 𝐵)𝜑 | ||
Theorem | wl-ralel 34727* | All elements of a class are elements of the class. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 10-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ ∀(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 | ||
Definition | df-wl-rex 34728 |
Restrict an existential quantifier to a class 𝐴. This version does
not interpret elementhood verbatim as ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 does. Assuming a
real elementhood can lead to awkward consequences should the class 𝐴
depend on 𝑥. Instead we base the definition on
df-wl-ral 34718, where
this is ruled out. Other definitions are wl-dfrexsb 34733 and
wl-dfrexex 34732. If 𝑥 is not free in 𝐴, the defining expression
can be simplified (see wl-dfrexf 34729, wl-dfrexv 34731).
This definition lets 𝑥 appear as a formal parameter with no connection to 𝐴, but occurrences in 𝜑 are fully honored. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.) Isolate x from A. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 25-May-2023.) |
⊢ (∃(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀(𝑥 : 𝐴) ¬ 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | wl-dfrexf 34729 | Restricted existential quantification (df-wl-rex 34728) allows a simplification, if we can assume all occurrences of 𝑥 in 𝐴 are bounded. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 25-May-2023.) |
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (∃(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
Theorem | wl-dfrexfi 34730 | Restricted universal quantification (df-wl-rex 34728) allows a simplification, if we can assume all occurrences of 𝑥 in 𝐴 are bounded. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 26-May-2023.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (∃(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | wl-dfrexv 34731* | Alternate definition of restricted universal quantification (df-wl-rex 34728) when 𝑥 and 𝐴 are disjoint. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 25-May-2023.) |
⊢ (∃(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | wl-dfrexex 34732* | Alternate definition of the restricted existential quantification (df-wl-rex 34728), according to the pattern given in df-wl-ral 34718. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 25-May-2023.) |
⊢ (∃(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
Theorem | wl-dfrexsb 34733* | An alternate definition of restricted existential quantification (df-wl-rex 34728) using substitution. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 25-May-2023.) |
⊢ (∃(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
Definition | df-wl-rmo 34734* |
Restrict "at most one" to a given class 𝐴. This version does not
interpret elementhood verbatim like ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 does. Assuming a
real elementhood can lead to awkward consequences should the class 𝐴
depend on 𝑥. Instead we base the definition on
df-wl-ral 34718, where
this is already ruled out.
This definition lets 𝑥 appear as a formal parameter with no connection to 𝐴, but occurrences in 𝜑 are fully honored. Alternate definitions are given in wl-dfrmosb 34735 and, if 𝑥 is not free in 𝐴, wl-dfrmov 34736 and wl-dfrmof 34737. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.) Isolate x from A. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 26-May-2023.) |
⊢ (∃*(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∀(𝑥 : 𝐴)(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | wl-dfrmosb 34735* | An alternate definition of restricted "at most one" (df-wl-rmo 34734) using substitution. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 27-May-2023.) |
⊢ (∃*(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | wl-dfrmov 34736* | Alternate definition of restricted "at most one" (df-wl-rmo 34734) when 𝑥 and 𝐴 are disjoint. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 28-May-2023.) |
⊢ (∃*(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | wl-dfrmof 34737 | Restricted "at most one" (df-wl-rmo 34734) allows a simplification, if we can assume all occurrences of 𝑥 in 𝐴 are bounded. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 28-May-2023.) |
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (∃*(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
Definition | df-wl-reu 34738 |
Restrict existential uniqueness to a given class 𝐴. This version
does not interpret elementhood verbatim like ∃!𝑥 ∈
𝐴𝜑 does.
Assuming a real elementhood can lead to awkward consequences should the
class 𝐴 depend on 𝑥. Instead we base the
definition on
df-wl-ral 34718, where this is ruled out.
This definition lets 𝑥 appear as a formal parameter with no connection to 𝐴, but occurrences in 𝜑 are fully honored. Alternate definitions are given in wl-dfreusb 34739 and, if 𝑥 is not free in 𝐴, wl-dfreuv 34740 and wl-dfreuf 34741. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.) Isolate x from A. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 28-May-2023.) |
⊢ (∃!(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ (∃(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ∧ ∃*(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | wl-dfreusb 34739* | An alternate definition of restricted existential uniqueness (df-wl-reu 34738) using substitution. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 28-May-2023.) |
⊢ (∃!(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | wl-dfreuv 34740* | Alternate definition of restricted existential uniqueness (df-wl-reu 34738) when 𝑥 and 𝐴 are disjoint. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 28-May-2023.) |
⊢ (∃!(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | wl-dfreuf 34741 | Restricted existential uniqueness (df-wl-reu 34738) allows a simplification, if we can assume all occurrences of 𝑥 in 𝐴 are bounded. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 28-May-2023.) |
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → (∃!(𝑥 : 𝐴)𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
Definition | df-wl-rab 34742* | Define a restricted class abstraction (class builder), which is the class of all 𝑥 in 𝐴 such that 𝜑 is true. Definition of [TakeutiZaring] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) Isolate x from A. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 28-May-2023.) |
⊢ {𝑥 : 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))} | ||
Theorem | wl-dfrabsb 34743* | Alternate definition of restricted class abstraction (df-wl-rab 34742), using substitution. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 28-May-2023.) |
⊢ {𝑥 : 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)} | ||
Theorem | wl-dfrabv 34744* | Alternate definition of restricted class abstraction (df-wl-rab 34742), when 𝑥 and 𝐴 are disjoint. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 29-May-2023.) |
⊢ {𝑥 : 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | ||
Theorem | wl-clelsb3df 34745 | Deduction version of clelsb3f 2982. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 29-May-2023.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝑥 / 𝑦]𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | wl-dfrabf 34746 | Alternate definition of restricted class abstraction (df-wl-rab 34742), when 𝑥 is not free in 𝐴. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 29-May-2023.) |
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → {𝑥 : 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}) | ||
Theorem | rabiun 34747* | Abstraction restricted to an indexed union. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 26-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} | ||
Theorem | iundif1 34748* | Indexed union of class difference with the subtrahend held constant. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 6-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) = (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | imadifss 34749 | The difference of images is a subset of the image of the difference. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∖ (𝐹 “ 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cureq 34750 | Equality theorem for currying. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 2-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → curry 𝐴 = curry 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | unceq 34751 | Equality theorem for uncurrying. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 2-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → uncurry 𝐴 = uncurry 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | curf 34752 | Functional property of currying. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 2-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → curry 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝐶 ↑m 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | uncf 34753 | Functional property of uncurrying. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 2-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝐶 ↑m 𝐵) → uncurry 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶) | ||
Theorem | curfv 34754 | Value of currying. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 2-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ (((𝐹 Fn (𝑉 × 𝑊) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) → ((curry 𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | uncov 34755 | Value of uncurrying. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 2-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴uncurry 𝐹𝐵) = ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | curunc 34756 | Currying of uncurrying. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 2-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝐶 ↑m 𝐵) ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → curry uncurry 𝐹 = 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | unccur 34757 | Uncurrying of currying. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 5-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → uncurry curry 𝐹 = 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | phpreu 34758* | Theorem related to pigeonhole principle. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | finixpnum 34759* | A finite Cartesian product of numerable sets is numerable. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 24-Feb-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ dom card) | ||
Theorem | fin2solem 34760* | Lemma for fin2so 34761. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 29-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑥 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) → (𝑦𝑅𝑧 → {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑤𝑅𝑦} [⊊] {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ 𝑤𝑅𝑧})) | ||
Theorem | fin2so 34761 | Any totally ordered Tarski-finite set is finite; in particular, no amorphous set can be ordered. Theorem 2 of [Levy58]] p. 4. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 28-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ FinII ∧ 𝑅 Or 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | ltflcei 34762 | Theorem to move the floor function across a strict inequality. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 25-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((⌊‘𝐴) < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 < -(⌊‘-𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | leceifl 34763 | Theorem to move the floor function across a non-strict inequality. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 25-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (-(⌊‘-𝐴) ≤ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ≤ (⌊‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | sin2h 34764 | Half-angle rule for sine. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 3-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0[,](2 · π)) → (sin‘(𝐴 / 2)) = (√‘((1 − (cos‘𝐴)) / 2))) | ||
Theorem | cos2h 34765 | Half-angle rule for cosine. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 4-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (-π[,]π) → (cos‘(𝐴 / 2)) = (√‘((1 + (cos‘𝐴)) / 2))) | ||
Theorem | tan2h 34766 | Half-angle rule for tangent. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 4-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0[,)π) → (tan‘(𝐴 / 2)) = (√‘((1 − (cos‘𝐴)) / (1 + (cos‘𝐴))))) | ||
Theorem | lindsadd 34767 | In a vector space, the union of an independent set and a vector not in its span is an independent set. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 4-Mar-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ ((LSpan‘𝑊)‘𝐹))) → (𝐹 ∪ {𝑋}) ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊)) | ||
Theorem | lindsdom 34768 | A linearly independent set in a free linear module of finite dimension over a division ring is smaller than the dimension of the module. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 2-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ DivRing ∧ 𝐼 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (LIndS‘(𝑅 freeLMod 𝐼))) → 𝑋 ≼ 𝐼) | ||
Theorem | lindsenlbs 34769 | A maximal linearly independent set in a free module of finite dimension over a division ring is a basis. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 2-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ DivRing ∧ 𝐼 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (LIndS‘(𝑅 freeLMod 𝐼))) ∧ 𝑋 ≈ 𝐼) → 𝑋 ∈ (LBasis‘(𝑅 freeLMod 𝐼))) | ||
Theorem | matunitlindflem1 34770 | One direction of matunitlindf 34772. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 2-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ Field ∧ 𝑀:(𝐼 × 𝐼)⟶(Base‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Fin ∖ {∅})) → (¬ curry 𝑀 LIndF (𝑅 freeLMod 𝐼) → ((𝐼 maDet 𝑅)‘𝑀) = (0g‘𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | matunitlindflem2 34771 | One direction of matunitlindf 34772. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 2-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ ((((𝑅 ∈ Field ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (Base‘(𝐼 Mat 𝑅))) ∧ 𝐼 ≠ ∅) ∧ curry 𝑀 LIndF (𝑅 freeLMod 𝐼)) → ((𝐼 maDet 𝑅)‘𝑀) ∈ (Unit‘𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | matunitlindf 34772 | A matrix over a field is invertible iff the rows are linearly independent. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 2-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Field ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (Base‘(𝐼 Mat 𝑅))) → (𝑀 ∈ (Unit‘(𝐼 Mat 𝑅)) ↔ curry 𝑀 LIndF (𝑅 freeLMod 𝐼))) | ||
Theorem | ptrest 34773* | Expressing a restriction of a product topology as a product topology. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 24-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶Top) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((∏t‘𝐹) ↾t X𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝑆) = (∏t‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑘) ↾t 𝑆)))) | ||
Theorem | ptrecube 34774* | Any point in an open set of N-space is surrounded by an open cube within that set. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑅 = (∏t‘((1...𝑁) × {(topGen‘ran (,))})) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((abs ∘ − ) ↾ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℝ+ X𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁)((𝑃‘𝑛)(ball‘𝐷)𝑑) ⊆ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem1 34775* | Lemma for poimir 34807- the vertices on either side of a skipped vertex differ in at least two dimensions. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < 𝑀, 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌(𝑇 ∘f + (((𝑈 “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ ((𝑈 “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇:(1...𝑁)⟶ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∃*𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁)((𝐹‘(𝑀 − 1))‘𝑛) ≠ ((𝐹‘𝑀)‘𝑛)) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem2 34776* | Lemma for poimir 34807- consecutive vertices differ in at most one dimension. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < 𝑀, 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌(𝑇 ∘f + (((𝑈 “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ ((𝑈 “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇:(1...𝑁)⟶ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ((0...𝑁) ∖ {𝑉})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁)((𝐹‘(𝑉 − 1))‘𝑛) ≠ ((𝐹‘𝑉)‘𝑛)) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem3 34777* | Lemma for poimir 34807 to add an interior point to an admissible face on the back face of the cube. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇:(1...𝑀)⟶(0..^𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈:(1...𝑀)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑀)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑀)∃𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)𝑖 = ⦋((𝑇 ∘f + (((𝑈 “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ ((𝑈 “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑀)) × {0}))) ∪ (((𝑀 + 1)...𝑁) × {0})) / 𝑝⦌𝐵 → (〈(𝑇 ∪ {〈(𝑀 + 1), 0〉}), (𝑈 ∪ {〈(𝑀 + 1), (𝑀 + 1)〉})〉 ∈ (((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...(𝑀 + 1))) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...(𝑀 + 1))–1-1-onto→(1...(𝑀 + 1))}) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑀)∃𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)𝑖 = ⦋(((𝑇 ∪ {〈(𝑀 + 1), 0〉}) ∘f + ((((𝑈 ∪ {〈(𝑀 + 1), (𝑀 + 1)〉}) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((𝑈 ∪ {〈(𝑀 + 1), (𝑀 + 1)〉}) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...(𝑀 + 1))) × {0}))) ∪ ((((𝑀 + 1) + 1)...𝑁) × {0})) / 𝑝⦌𝐵 ∧ ((𝑇 ∪ {〈(𝑀 + 1), 0〉})‘(𝑀 + 1)) = 0 ∧ ((𝑈 ∪ {〈(𝑀 + 1), (𝑀 + 1)〉})‘(𝑀 + 1)) = (𝑀 + 1))))) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem4 34778* | Lemma for poimir 34807 connecting the admissible faces on the back face of the (𝑀 + 1)-cube to admissible simplices in the 𝑀-cube. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑠 ∈ (((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑀)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑀)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑀)}) ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑀)∃𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)𝑖 = ⦋(((1st ‘𝑠) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘𝑠) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘𝑠) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑀)) × {0}))) ∪ (((𝑀 + 1)...𝑁) × {0})) / 𝑝⦌𝐵} ≈ {𝑠 ∈ (((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...(𝑀 + 1))) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...(𝑀 + 1))–1-1-onto→(1...(𝑀 + 1))}) ∣ (∀𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑀)∃𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)𝑖 = ⦋(((1st ‘𝑠) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘𝑠) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘𝑠) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...(𝑀 + 1))) × {0}))) ∪ ((((𝑀 + 1) + 1)...𝑁) × {0})) / 𝑝⦌𝐵 ∧ ((1st ‘𝑠)‘(𝑀 + 1)) = 0 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑠)‘(𝑀 + 1)) = (𝑀 + 1))}) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem5 34779* | Lemma for poimir 34807 to establish that, for the simplices defined by a walk along the edges of an 𝑁-cube, if the starting vertex is not opposite a given face, it is the earliest vertex of the face on the walk. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < (2nd ‘𝑡), 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (2nd ‘𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑇))) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem6 34780* | Lemma for poimir 34807 establishing, for a face of a simplex defined by a walk along the edges of an 𝑁-cube, the single dimension in which successive vertices before the opposite vertex differ. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < (2nd ‘𝑡), 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝑇) ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (1...((2nd ‘𝑇) − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁)((𝐹‘(𝑀 − 1))‘𝑛) ≠ ((𝐹‘𝑀)‘𝑛)) = ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑇))‘𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem7 34781* | Lemma for poimir 34807, similar to poimirlem6 34780, but for vertices after the opposite vertex. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < (2nd ‘𝑡), 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝑇) ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ((((2nd ‘𝑇) + 1) + 1)...𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁)((𝐹‘(𝑀 − 2))‘𝑛) ≠ ((𝐹‘(𝑀 − 1))‘𝑛)) = ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑇))‘𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem8 34782* | Lemma for poimir 34807, establishing that away from the opposite vertex the walks in poimirlem9 34783 yield the same vertices. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < (2nd ‘𝑡), 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝑇) ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑈)) ↾ ((1...𝑁) ∖ {(2nd ‘𝑇), ((2nd ‘𝑇) + 1)})) = ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑇)) ↾ ((1...𝑁) ∖ {(2nd ‘𝑇), ((2nd ‘𝑇) + 1)}))) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem9 34783* | Lemma for poimir 34807, establishing the two walks that yield a given face when the opposite vertex is neither first nor last. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < (2nd ‘𝑡), 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝑇) ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑈)) ≠ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑇))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑈)) = ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑇)) ∘ ({〈(2nd ‘𝑇), ((2nd ‘𝑇) + 1)〉, 〈((2nd ‘𝑇) + 1), (2nd ‘𝑇)〉} ∪ ( I ↾ ((1...𝑁) ∖ {(2nd ‘𝑇), ((2nd ‘𝑇) + 1)}))))) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem10 34784* | Lemma for poimir 34807 establishing the cube that yields the simplex that yields a face if the opposite vertex was first on the walk. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < (2nd ‘𝑡), 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(0...(𝑁 − 1))⟶((0...𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝑇) = 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘(𝑁 − 1)) ∘f − ((1...𝑁) × {1})) = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝑇))) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem11 34785* | Lemma for poimir 34807 connecting walks that could yield from a given cube a given face opposite the first vertex of the walk. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < (2nd ‘𝑡), 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(0...(𝑁 − 1))⟶((0...𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝑇) = 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝑈) = 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (1...𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑇)) “ (1...𝑀)) ⊆ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑈)) “ (1...𝑀))) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem12 34786* | Lemma for poimir 34807 connecting walks that could yield from a given cube a given face opposite the final vertex of the walk. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < (2nd ‘𝑡), 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(0...(𝑁 − 1))⟶((0...𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝑇) = 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝑈) = 𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑇)) “ (1...𝑀)) ⊆ ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑈)) “ (1...𝑀))) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem13 34787* | Lemma for poimir 34807- for at most one simplex associated with a shared face is the opposite vertex first on the walk. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < (2nd ‘𝑡), 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(0...(𝑁 − 1))⟶((0...𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 (2nd ‘𝑧) = 0) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem14 34788* | Lemma for poimir 34807- for at most one simplex associated with a shared face is the opposite vertex last on the walk. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < (2nd ‘𝑡), 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(0...(𝑁 − 1))⟶((0...𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 (2nd ‘𝑧) = 𝑁) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem15 34789* | Lemma for poimir 34807, that the face in poimirlem22 34796 is a face. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < (2nd ‘𝑡), 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(0...(𝑁 − 1))⟶((0...𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝑇) ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈〈(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑇)), ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑇)) ∘ ({〈(2nd ‘𝑇), ((2nd ‘𝑇) + 1)〉, 〈((2nd ‘𝑇) + 1), (2nd ‘𝑇)〉} ∪ ( I ↾ ((1...𝑁) ∖ {(2nd ‘𝑇), ((2nd ‘𝑇) + 1)}))))〉, (2nd ‘𝑇)〉 ∈ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem16 34790* | Lemma for poimir 34807 establishing the vertices of the simplex of poimirlem17 34791. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < (2nd ‘𝑡), 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(0...(𝑁 − 1))⟶((0...𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐹(𝑝‘𝑛) ≠ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝑇) = 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ((𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑇))‘𝑛) + if(𝑛 = ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑇))‘1), 1, 0))) ∘f + (((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑇)) ∘ (𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑛 = 𝑁, 1, (𝑛 + 1)))) “ (1...𝑦)) × {1}) ∪ ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑇)) ∘ (𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑛 = 𝑁, 1, (𝑛 + 1)))) “ ((𝑦 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem17 34791* | Lemma for poimir 34807 establishing existence for poimirlem18 34792. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < (2nd ‘𝑡), 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(0...(𝑁 − 1))⟶((0...𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐹(𝑝‘𝑛) ≠ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝑇) = 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≠ 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem18 34792* | Lemma for poimir 34807 stating that, given a face not on a front face of the main cube and a simplex in which it's opposite the first vertex on the walk, there exists exactly one other simplex containing it. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < (2nd ‘𝑡), 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(0...(𝑁 − 1))⟶((0...𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐹(𝑝‘𝑛) ≠ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝑇) = 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≠ 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem19 34793* | Lemma for poimir 34807 establishing the vertices of the simplex in poimirlem20 34794. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < (2nd ‘𝑡), 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(0...(𝑁 − 1))⟶((0...𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐹(𝑝‘𝑛) ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝑇) = 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ((𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑇))‘𝑛) − if(𝑛 = ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑇))‘𝑁), 1, 0))) ∘f + (((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑇)) ∘ (𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑛 = 1, 𝑁, (𝑛 − 1)))) “ (1...(𝑦 + 1))) × {1}) ∪ ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑇)) ∘ (𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑛 = 1, 𝑁, (𝑛 − 1)))) “ (((𝑦 + 1) + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem20 34794* | Lemma for poimir 34807 establishing existence for poimirlem21 34795. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < (2nd ‘𝑡), 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(0...(𝑁 − 1))⟶((0...𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐹(𝑝‘𝑛) ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝑇) = 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≠ 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem21 34795* | Lemma for poimir 34807 stating that, given a face not on a back face of the cube and a simplex in which it's opposite the final point of the walk, there exists exactly one other simplex containing it. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < (2nd ‘𝑡), 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(0...(𝑁 − 1))⟶((0...𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐹(𝑝‘𝑛) ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2nd ‘𝑇) = 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≠ 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem22 34796* | Lemma for poimir 34807, that a given face belongs to exactly two simplices, provided it's not on the boundary of the cube. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < (2nd ‘𝑡), 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑡)) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(0...(𝑁 − 1))⟶((0...𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐹(𝑝‘𝑛) ≠ 0) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐹(𝑝‘𝑛) ≠ 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≠ 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem23 34797* | Lemma for poimir 34807, two ways of expressing the property that a face is not on the back face of the cube. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇:(1...𝑁)⟶(0..^𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ (0...𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑝 ∈ ran (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < 𝑉, 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌(𝑇 ∘f + (((𝑈 “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ ((𝑈 “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))))(𝑝‘𝑁) ≠ 0 ↔ ¬ (𝑉 = 𝑁 ∧ ((𝑇‘𝑁) = 0 ∧ (𝑈‘𝑁) = 𝑁)))) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem24 34798* | Lemma for poimir 34807, two ways of expressing that a simplex has an admissible face on the back face of the cube. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝑝 = ((1st ‘𝑠) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘𝑠) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘𝑠) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑝:(1...𝑁)⟶(0...𝐾)) → 𝐵 ∈ (0...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇:(1...𝑁)⟶(0..^𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ (0...𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ (((0...𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↑m (0...(𝑁 − 1)))(𝑥 = (𝑦 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ ⦋if(𝑦 < 𝑉, 𝑦, (𝑦 + 1)) / 𝑗⦌(𝑇 ∘f + (((𝑈 “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ ((𝑈 “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0})))) ∧ ((0...(𝑁 − 1)) ⊆ ran (𝑝 ∈ ran 𝑥 ↦ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ ran 𝑥(𝑝‘𝑁) ≠ 0)) ↔ (∀𝑖 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))∃𝑗 ∈ ((0...𝑁) ∖ {𝑉})𝑖 = ⦋〈𝑇, 𝑈〉 / 𝑠⦌𝐶 ∧ ¬ (𝑉 = 𝑁 ∧ ((𝑇‘𝑁) = 0 ∧ (𝑈‘𝑁) = 𝑁))))) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem25 34799* | Lemma for poimir 34807 stating that for a given simplex such that no vertex maps to 𝑁, the number of admissible faces is even. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝑝 = ((1st ‘𝑠) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘𝑠) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘𝑠) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑝:(1...𝑁)⟶(0...𝐾)) → 𝐵 ∈ (0...𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇:(1...𝑁)⟶(0..^𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑁)) → 𝑁 ≠ ⦋〈𝑇, 𝑈〉 / 𝑠⦌𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 2 ∥ (♯‘{𝑦 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))∃𝑗 ∈ ((0...𝑁) ∖ {𝑦})𝑖 = ⦋〈𝑇, 𝑈〉 / 𝑠⦌𝐶})) | ||
Theorem | poimirlem26 34800* | Lemma for poimir 34807 showing an even difference between the number of admissible faces and the number of admissible simplices. Equation (6) of [Kulpa] p. 548. (Contributed by Brendan Leahy, 21-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝑝 = ((1st ‘𝑠) ∘f + ((((2nd ‘𝑠) “ (1...𝑗)) × {1}) ∪ (((2nd ‘𝑠) “ ((𝑗 + 1)...𝑁)) × {0}))) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑝:(1...𝑁)⟶(0...𝐾)) → 𝐵 ∈ (0...𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 2 ∥ ((♯‘{𝑡 ∈ ((((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) × (0...𝑁)) ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))∃𝑗 ∈ ((0...𝑁) ∖ {(2nd ‘𝑡)})𝑖 = ⦋(1st ‘𝑡) / 𝑠⦌𝐶}) − (♯‘{𝑠 ∈ (((0..^𝐾) ↑m (1...𝑁)) × {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(1...𝑁)}) ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0...𝑁)∃𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑖 = 𝐶}))) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |