Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 392 of 449) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28623) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28624-30146) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30147-44804) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | renpncan3 39101 | Cancellation law for real subtraction. Compare npncan3 10913. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 28-Jan-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) + (𝐶 −ℝ 𝐴)) = (𝐶 −ℝ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | repnpcan 39102 | Cancellation law for addition and real subtraction. Compare pnpcan 10914. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 19-May-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) −ℝ (𝐴 + 𝐶)) = (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | reppncan 39103 | Cancellation law for mixed addition and real subtraction. Compare ppncan 10917. (Contributed by SN, 3-Sep-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) + (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶)) = (𝐴 + 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | resubidaddid1lem 39104 | Lemma for resubidaddid1 39105. A special case of npncan 10896. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 8-Jan-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) = (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) + (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶)) = (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | resubidaddid1 39105 | Any real number subtracted from itself forms a left additive identity. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 8-Jan-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 −ℝ 𝐴) + 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | resubdi 39106 | Distribution of multiplication over real subtraction. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 3-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) −ℝ (𝐴 · 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | re1m1e0m0 39107 | Equality of two left-additive identities. See resubidaddid1 39105. Uses ax-i2m1 10594. (Contributed by SN, 25-Dec-2023.) |
⊢ (1 −ℝ 1) = (0 −ℝ 0) | ||
Theorem | sn-00idlem1 39108 | Lemma for sn-00id 39111. (Contributed by SN, 25-Dec-2023.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · (0 −ℝ 0)) = (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | sn-00idlem2 39109 | Lemma for sn-00id 39111. (Contributed by SN, 25-Dec-2023.) |
⊢ ((0 −ℝ 0) ≠ 0 → (0 −ℝ 0) = 1) | ||
Theorem | sn-00idlem3 39110 | Lemma for sn-00id 39111. (Contributed by SN, 25-Dec-2023.) |
⊢ ((0 −ℝ 0) = 1 → (0 + 0) = 0) | ||
Theorem | sn-00id 39111 | 00id 10804 proven without ax-mulcom 10590 but using ax-1ne0 10595. (Though note that the current version of 00id 10804 can be changed to avoid ax-icn 10585, ax-addcl 10586, ax-mulcl 10588, ax-i2m1 10594, ax-cnre 10599. Most of this is by using 0cnALT3 39033 instead of 0cn 10622). (Contributed by SN, 25-Dec-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (0 + 0) = 0 | ||
Theorem | re0m0e0 39112 | Real number version of 0m0e0 11746 proven without ax-mulcom 10590. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (0 −ℝ 0) = 0 | ||
Theorem | readdid2 39113 | Real number version of addid2 10812. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | sn-addid2 39114 | addid2 10812 without ax-mulcom 10590. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | remul02 39115 | Real number version of mul02 10807 proven without ax-mulcom 10590. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 · 𝐴) = 0) | ||
Theorem | sn-0ne2 39116 | 0ne2 11833 without ax-mulcom 10590. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ 0 ≠ 2 | ||
Theorem | remul01 39117 | Real number version of mul01 10808 proven without ax-mulcom 10590. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · 0) = 0) | ||
Theorem | resubid 39118 | Subtraction of a real number from itself (compare subid 10894). (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐴) = 0) | ||
Theorem | readdid1 39119 | Real number version of addid1 10809, without ax-mulcom 10590. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | resubid1 39120 | Real number version of subid1 10895, without ax-mulcom 10590. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 −ℝ 0) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | renegneg 39121 | A real number is equal to the negative of its negative. Compare negneg 10925. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 −ℝ (0 −ℝ 𝐴)) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | readdcan2 39122 | Commuted version of readdcan 10803 without ax-mulcom 10590. (Contributed by SN, 21-Feb-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | sn-ltaddpos 39123 | ltaddpos 11119 without ax-mulcom 10590. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (0 < 𝐴 ↔ 𝐵 < (𝐵 + 𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | relt0neg1 39124 | Comparison of a real and its negative to zero. Compare lt0neg1 11135. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 < 0 ↔ 0 < (0 −ℝ 𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | relt0neg2 39125 | Comparison of a real and its negative to zero. Compare lt0neg2 11136. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 < 𝐴 ↔ (0 −ℝ 𝐴) < 0)) | ||
Theorem | sn-0lt1 39126 | 0lt1 11151 without ax-mulcom 10590. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.) |
⊢ 0 < 1 | ||
Theorem | sn-ltp1 39127 | ltp1 11469 without ax-mulcom 10590. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 < (𝐴 + 1)) | ||
Theorem | remulinvcom 39128 | A left multiplicative inverse is a right multiplicative inverse. Proven without ax-mulcom 10590. (Contributed by SN, 5-Feb-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 · 𝐴) = 1) | ||
Theorem | remulid2 39129 | Commuted version of ax-1rid 10596 and real number version of mulid2 10629 without ax-mulcom 10590. (Contributed by SN, 5-Feb-2024.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (1 · 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | remulcand 39130 | Commuted version of remulcan2d 39036 without ax-mulcom 10590. (Contributed by SN, 21-Feb-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 · 𝐴) = (𝐶 · 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
Looking at a corner in 3D space, one can see three right angles. It is impossible to draw three lines in 2D space such that any two of these lines are perpendicular, but a good enough representation is made by casting lines from the 2D surface. Points along the same cast line are collapsed into one point on the 2D surface. In many cases, the 2D surface is smaller than whatever needs to be represented. If the lines cast were perpendicular to the 2D surface, then only areas as small as the 2D surface could be represented. To fix this, the lines need to get further apart as they go farther from the 2D surface. On the other side of the 2D surface the lines will get closer together and intersect at a point. (Because it's defined that way). From this perspective, two parallel lines in 3D space will be represented by two lines that seem to intersect at a point "at infinity". Considering all maximal classes of parallel lines on a 2D plane in 3D space, these classes will all appear to intersect at different points at infinity, forming a line at infinity. Therefore the real projective plane can be thought of as the real affine plane together with the line at infinity. The projective plane takes care of some exceptions that may be found in the affine plane. For example, consider the curve that is the zeroes of 𝑦 = 𝑥↑2. Any line connecting the point (0, 1) to the x-axis intersects with the curve twice, except for the vertical line between (0, 1) and (0, 0). In the projective plane, the curve becomes an ellipse and there is no exception. While it may not seem like it, points at infinity and points corresponding to the affine plane are the same type of point. Consider a line going through the origin in 3D (affine) space. Either it intersects the plane 𝑧 = 1 once, or it is entirely within the plane 𝑧 = 0. If it is entirely within the plane 𝑧 = 0, then it corresponds to the point at infinity intersecting all lines on the plane 𝑧 = 1 with the same slope. Else it corresponds to the point in the 2D plane 𝑧 = 1 that it intersects. So there is a bijection between 3D lines through the origin and points on the real projective plane. The concept of projective spaces generalizes the projective plane to any dimension. | ||
Syntax | cprjsp 39131 | Extend class notation with the projective space function. |
class ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛 | ||
Definition | df-prjsp 39132* | Define the projective space function. In the bijection between 3D lines through the origin and points in the projective plane (see section comment), this is equivalent to making any two 3D points (excluding the origin) equivalent iff one is a multiple of another. This definition does not quite give all the properties needed, since the scalars of a left vector space can be "less dense" than the vectors (for example, equivocating rational multiples of real numbers). (Contributed by BJ and Steven Nguyen, 29-Apr-2023.) |
⊢ ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛 = (𝑣 ∈ LVec ↦ ⦋((Base‘𝑣) ∖ {(0g‘𝑣)}) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 / {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑣))𝑥 = (𝑙( ·𝑠 ‘𝑣)𝑦))})) | ||
Theorem | prjspval 39133* | Value of the projective space function, which is also known as the projectivization of 𝑉. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 29-Apr-2023.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)}) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LVec → (ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛‘𝑉) = (𝐵 / {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))})) | ||
Theorem | prjsprel 39134* | Utility theorem regarding the relation used in ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 29-Apr-2023.) |
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ↔ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐾 𝑋 = (𝑚 · 𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | prjspertr 39135* | The relation in ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛 is transitive. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-May-2023.) |
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))} & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)}) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ∼ 𝑍)) → 𝑋 ∼ 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | prjsperref 39136* | The relation in ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛 is reflexive. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 30-Apr-2023.) |
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))} & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)}) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LMod → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑋 ∼ 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | prjspersym 39137* | The relation in ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛 is symmetric. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-May-2023.) |
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))} & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)}) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝑋 ∼ 𝑌) → 𝑌 ∼ 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | prjsper 39138* | The relation in ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛 is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-May-2023.) |
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))} & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)}) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LVec → ∼ Er 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | prjspreln0 39139* | Two nonzero vectors are equivalent by a nonzero scalar. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 31-May-2023.) |
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))} & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)}) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LVec → (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ↔ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑚 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 })𝑋 = (𝑚 · 𝑌)))) | ||
Theorem | prjspvs 39140* | A nonzero multiple of a vector is equivalent to the vector. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))} & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)}) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 })) → (𝑁 · 𝑋) ∼ 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | prjsprellsp 39141* | Two vectors are equivalent iff their spans are equal. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 31-May-2023.) |
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))} & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)}) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ↔ (𝑁‘{𝑋}) = (𝑁‘{𝑌}))) | ||
Theorem | prjspeclsp 39142* | The vectors equivalent to a vector 𝑋 are the nonzero vectors in the span of 𝑋. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))} & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)}) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → [𝑋] ∼ = ((𝑁‘{𝑋}) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})) | ||
Theorem | prjspval2 39143* | Alternate definition of projective space. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ { 0 }) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LVec → (ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛‘𝑉) = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 {((𝑁‘{𝑧}) ∖ { 0 })}) | ||
Syntax | cprjspn 39144 | Extend class notation with the n-dimensional projective space function. |
class ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛n | ||
Definition | df-prjspn 39145* | Define the n-dimensional projective space function. A projective space of dimension 1 is a projective line, and a projective space of dimension 2 is a projective plane. Compare df-ehl 23918. This space is considered n-dimensional because the vector space (𝑘 freeLMod (0...𝑛)) is (n+1)-dimensional and the ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛 function returns equivalence classes with respect to a linear (1-dimensional) relation. (Contributed by BJ and Steven Nguyen, 29-Apr-2023.) |
⊢ ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛n = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑘 ∈ DivRing ↦ (ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛‘(𝑘 freeLMod (0...𝑛)))) | ||
Theorem | prjspnval 39146 | Value of the n-dimensional projective space function. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-May-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ DivRing) → (𝑁ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛n𝐾) = (ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛‘(𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁)))) | ||
Theorem | prjspnval2 39147* | Value of the n-dimensional projective space function, expanded. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 15-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))} & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)}) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ DivRing) → (𝑁ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛n𝐾) = (𝐵 / ∼ )) | ||
Theorem | 0prjspnlem 39148 | Lemma for 0prjspn 39150. The given unit vector is a nonzero vector. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 16-Jul-2023.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)}) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...0)) & ⊢ 1 = ((𝐾 unitVec (0...0))‘0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DivRing → 1 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | 0prjspnrel 39149* | In the zero-dimensional projective space, all vectors are equivalent to the unit vector. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))} & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)}) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...0)) & ⊢ 1 = ((𝐾 unitVec (0...0))‘0) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ DivRing ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑋 ∼ 1 ) | ||
Theorem | 0prjspn 39150 | A zero-dimensional projective space has only 1 point. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 9-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...0)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DivRing → (0ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛n𝐾) = {𝐵}) | ||
Theorem | dffltz 39151* | Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT) for nonzero integers is equivalent to the original scope of natural numbers. The backwards direction takes (𝑎↑𝑛) + (𝑏↑𝑛) = (𝑐↑𝑛), and adds the negative of any negative term to both sides, thus creating the corresponding equation with only positive integers. There are six combinations of negativity, so the proof is particularly long. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 27-Feb-2023.) |
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥↑𝑛) + (𝑦↑𝑛)) ≠ (𝑧↑𝑛) ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)∀𝑎 ∈ (ℤ ∖ {0})∀𝑏 ∈ (ℤ ∖ {0})∀𝑐 ∈ (ℤ ∖ {0})((𝑎↑𝑛) + (𝑏↑𝑛)) ≠ (𝑐↑𝑛)) | ||
Theorem | fltne 39152 | If a counterexample to FLT exists, its addends are not equal. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-Jun-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | fltltc 39153 | (𝐶↑𝑁) is the largest term and therefore 𝐵 < 𝐶. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 22-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | fltnltalem 39154 | Lemma for fltnlta 39155. A lower bound for 𝐴 based on pwdif 15213. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 22-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 − 𝐵) · ((𝐶↑(𝑁 − 1)) + ((𝑁 − 1) · (𝐵↑(𝑁 − 1))))) < (𝐴↑𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | fltnlta 39155 | 𝑁 is less than 𝐴. See https://www.youtu.be/EymVXkPWxyc for an outline. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 24-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 < 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | binom2d 39156 | Deduction form of binom2. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 14-Dec-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑2) = (((𝐴↑2) + (2 · (𝐴 · 𝐵))) + (𝐵↑2))) | ||
Theorem | cu3addd 39157 | Cube of sum of three numbers. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 14-Dec-2023.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶)↑3) = (((((𝐴↑3) + (3 · ((𝐴↑2) · 𝐵))) + ((3 · (𝐴 · (𝐵↑2))) + (𝐵↑3))) + (((3 · ((𝐴↑2) · 𝐶)) + (((3 · 2) · (𝐴 · 𝐵)) · 𝐶)) + (3 · ((𝐵↑2) · 𝐶)))) + (((3 · (𝐴 · (𝐶↑2))) + (3 · (𝐵 · (𝐶↑2)))) + (𝐶↑3)))) | ||
Theorem | sqnegd 39158 | The square of the negative of a number. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 21-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (-𝐴↑2) = (𝐴↑2)) | ||
Theorem | negexpidd 39159 | The sum of a real number to the power of N and the negative of the number to the power of N equals zero if N is a nonnegative odd integer. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 21-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (-𝐴↑𝑁)) = 0) | ||
Theorem | rexlimdv3d 39160* | An extended version of rexlimdvv 3293 to include three set variables. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 21-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓 → 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | 3cubeslem1 39161 | Lemma for 3cubes 39167. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (((𝐴 + 1)↑2) − 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | 3cubeslem2 39162 | Lemma for 3cubes 39167. Used to show that the denominators in 3cubeslem4 39166 are nonzero. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3) = 0) | ||
Theorem | 3cubeslem3l 39163 | Lemma for 3cubes 39167. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3)↑3)) = (((𝐴↑7) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑6) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑5) · ((3↑8) + (3↑8))) + (((𝐴↑4) · (((3↑7) · 2) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑3) · ((3↑6) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑2) · (3↑5)) + (𝐴 · (3↑3))))))))) | ||
Theorem | 3cubeslem3r 39164 | Lemma for 3cubes 39167. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) − 1)↑3) + (((-((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 1)↑3)) + ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴))↑3)) = (((𝐴↑7) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑6) · (3↑9)) + (((𝐴↑5) · ((3↑8) + (3↑8))) + (((𝐴↑4) · (((3↑7) · 2) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑3) · ((3↑6) + (3↑6))) + (((𝐴↑2) · (3↑5)) + (𝐴 · (3↑3))))))))) | ||
Theorem | 3cubeslem3 39165 | Lemma for 3cubes 39167. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3)↑3)) = ((((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) − 1)↑3) + (((-((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 1)↑3)) + ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴))↑3))) | ||
Theorem | 3cubeslem4 39166 | Lemma for 3cubes 39167. This is Ryley's explicit formula for decomposing a rational 𝐴 into a sum of three rational cubes. (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (((((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) − 1) / ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3))↑3) + ((((-((3↑3) · (𝐴↑3)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 1) / ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3))↑3)) + (((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) / ((((3↑3) · (𝐴↑2)) + ((3↑2) · 𝐴)) + 3))↑3))) | ||
Theorem | 3cubes 39167* | Every rational number is a sum of three rational cubes. (S. Ryley, The Ladies' Diary 122 (1825), 35) (Contributed by Igor Ieskov, 22-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℚ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℚ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℚ 𝐴 = (((𝑎↑3) + (𝑏↑3)) + (𝑐↑3))) | ||
Theorem | rntrclfvOAI 39168 | The range of the transitive closure is equal to the range of the relation. (Contributed by OpenAI, 7-Jul-2020.) |
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ran (t+‘𝑅) = ran 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | moxfr 39169* | Transfer at-most-one between related expressions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ ∃!𝑦 𝑥 = 𝐴 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦𝜓) | ||
Theorem | imaiinfv 39170* | Indexed intersection of an image. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘𝑥) = ∩ (𝐹 “ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | elrfi 39171* | Elementhood in a set of relative finite intersections. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘({𝐵} ∪ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝐶 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑣))) | ||
Theorem | elrfirn 39172* | Elementhood in a set of relative finite intersections of an indexed family of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐼⟶𝒫 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘({𝐵} ∪ ran 𝐹)) ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝐼 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑣 (𝐹‘𝑦)))) | ||
Theorem | elrfirn2 39173* | Elementhood in a set of relative finite intersections of an indexed family of sets (implicit). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘({𝐵} ∪ ran (𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ 𝐶))) ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝒫 𝐼 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑣 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | cmpfiiin 39174* | In a compact topology, a system of closed sets with nonempty finite intersections has a nonempty intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Comp) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑆 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑙 ⊆ 𝐼 ∧ 𝑙 ∈ Fin)) → (𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑙 𝑆) ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆) ≠ ∅) | ||
Theorem | ismrcd1 39175* | Any function from the subsets of a set to itself, which is extensive (satisfies mrcssid 16878), isotone (satisfies mrcss 16877), and idempotent (satisfies mrcidm 16880) has a collection of fixed points which is a Moore collection, and itself is the closure operator for that collection. This can be taken as an alternate definition for the closure operators. This is the first half, ismrcd2 39176 is the second. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 𝐵⟶𝒫 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → (𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐹‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝐹 ∩ I ) ∈ (Moore‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | ismrcd2 39176* | Second half of ismrcd1 39175. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 𝐵⟶𝒫 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → (𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐹‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (mrCls‘dom (𝐹 ∩ I ))) | ||
Theorem | istopclsd 39177* | A closure function which satisfies sscls 21594, clsidm 21605, cls0 21618, and clsun 33574 defines a (unique) topology which it is the closure function on. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 𝐵⟶𝒫 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐹‘𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝑥 ∪ 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∪ (𝐹‘𝑦))) & ⊢ 𝐽 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘(𝐵 ∖ 𝑧)) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝑧)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐵) ∧ (cls‘𝐽) = 𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | ismrc 39178* | A function is a Moore closure operator iff it satisfies mrcssid 16878, mrcss 16877, and mrcidm 16880. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (mrCls “ (Moore‘𝐵)) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹:𝒫 𝐵⟶𝒫 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → (𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐹‘𝑥))))) | ||
Syntax | cnacs 39179 | Class of Noetherian closure systems. |
class NoeACS | ||
Definition | df-nacs 39180* | Define a closure system of Noetherian type (not standard terminology) as an algebraic system where all closed sets are finitely generated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ NoeACS = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑐 ∈ (ACS‘𝑥) ∣ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝑐 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = ((mrCls‘𝑐)‘𝑔)}) | ||
Theorem | isnacs 39181* | Expand definition of Noetherian-type closure system. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔))) | ||
Theorem | nacsfg 39182* | In a Noetherian-type closure system, all closed sets are finitely generated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔)) | ||
Theorem | isnacs2 39183 | Express Noetherian-type closure system with fewer quantifiers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | mrefg2 39184* | Slight variation on finite generation for closure systems. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔))) | ||
Theorem | mrefg3 39185* | Slight variation on finite generation for closure systems. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐶) → (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)𝑆 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑔))) | ||
Theorem | nacsacs 39186 | A closure system of Noetherian type is algebraic. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) → 𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | isnacs3 39187* | A choice-free order equivalent to the Noetherian condition on a closure system. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝑠))) | ||
Theorem | incssnn0 39188* | Transitivity induction of subsets, lemma for nacsfix 39189. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 1)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | nacsfix 39189* | An increasing sequence of closed sets in a Noetherian-type closure system eventually fixates. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹:ℕ0⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 1))) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑧 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑦)(𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | constmap 39190 |
A constant (represented without dummy variables) is an element of a
function set.
Note: In the following development, we will be quite often quantifying over functions and points in N-dimensional space (which are equivalent to functions from an "index set"). Many of the following theorems exist to transfer standard facts about functions to elements of function sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∈ (𝐶 ↑m 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | mapco2g 39191 | Renaming indices in a tuple, with sethood as antecedents. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐸 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶) ∧ 𝐷:𝐸⟶𝐶) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐷) ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐸)) | ||
Theorem | mapco2 39192 | Post-composition (renaming indices) of a mapping viewed as a point. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐸 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶) ∧ 𝐷:𝐸⟶𝐶) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐷) ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐸)) | ||
Theorem | mapfzcons 39193 | Extending a one-based mapping by adding a tuple at the end results in another mapping. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ {〈𝑀, 𝐶〉}) ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑀))) | ||
Theorem | mapfzcons1 39194 | Recover prefix mapping from an extended mapping. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑁)) → ((𝐴 ∪ {〈𝑀, 𝐶〉}) ↾ (1...𝑁)) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | mapfzcons1cl 39195 | A nonempty mapping has a prefix. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑀)) → (𝐴 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | mapfzcons2 39196 | Recover added element from an extended mapping. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 ∪ {〈𝑀, 𝐶〉})‘𝑀) = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | mptfcl 39197* | Interpret range of a maps-to notation as a constraint on the definition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵):𝐴⟶𝐶 → (𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)) | ||
Syntax | cmzpcl 39198 | Extend class notation to include pre-polynomial rings. |
class mzPolyCld | ||
Syntax | cmzp 39199 | Extend class notation to include polynomial rings. |
class mzPoly | ||
Definition | df-mzpcl 39200* | Define the polynomially closed function rings over an arbitrary index set 𝑣. The set (mzPolyCld‘𝑣) contains all sets of functions from (ℤ ↑m 𝑣) to ℤ which include all constants and projections and are closed under addition and multiplication. This is a "temporary" set used to define the polynomial function ring itself (mzPoly‘𝑣); see df-mzp 39201. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ mzPolyCld = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ {𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 (ℤ ↑m (ℤ ↑m 𝑣)) ∣ ((∀𝑖 ∈ ℤ ((ℤ ↑m 𝑣) × {𝑖}) ∈ 𝑝 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑣 (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑣) ↦ (𝑥‘𝑗)) ∈ 𝑝) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝑝 ((𝑓 ∘f + 𝑔) ∈ 𝑝 ∧ (𝑓 ∘f · 𝑔) ∈ 𝑝))}) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |