Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 60 of 449) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28622) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28623-30145) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30146-44834) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | resmptd 5901* | Restriction of the mapping operation, deduction form. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ↾ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | dfres2 5902* | Alternate definition of the restriction operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2013.) |
⊢ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)} | ||
Theorem | mptss 5903* | Sufficient condition for inclusion among two functions in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | elidinxp 5904* | Characterization of the elements of the intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝐶 = 〈𝑥, 𝑥〉) | ||
Theorem | elidinxpid 5905* | Characterization of the elements of the intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian square. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 〈𝑥, 𝑥〉) | ||
Theorem | elrid 5906* | Characterization of the elements of a restricted identity relation. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Aug-2022.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ( I ↾ 𝑋) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑥〉) | ||
Theorem | idinxpres 5907 | The intersection of the identity relation with a cartesian product is the restriction of the identity relation to the intersection of the factors. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) Generalize statement from cartesian square (now idinxpresid 5908) to cartesian product. (Revised by BJ, 23-Dec-2023.) |
⊢ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ( I ↾ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | idinxpresid 5908 | The intersection of the identity relation with the cartesian square of a class is the restriction of the identity relation to that class. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 9-Sep-2022.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 23-Dec-2023.) |
⊢ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ( I ↾ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | idssxp 5909 | A diagonal set as a subset of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 9-Sep-2022.) |
⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | opabresid 5910* | The restricted identity relation expressed as an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by FL, 25-Apr-2012.) |
⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑥)} | ||
Theorem | mptresid 5911* | The restricted identity relation expressed in maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 25-Apr-2012.) |
⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑥) | ||
Theorem | opabresidOLD 5912* | Obsolete version of opabresid 5910 as of 26-Dec-2023. (Contributed by FL, 25-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑥)} = ( I ↾ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | mptresidOLD 5913* | Obsolete version of mptresid 5911 as of 26-Dec-2023. (Contributed by FL, 25-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑥) = ( I ↾ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | dmresi 5914 | The domain of a restricted identity function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2004.) |
⊢ dom ( I ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | restidsing 5915 | Restriction of the identity to a singleton. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 25-Aug-2021.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 6-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ ( I ↾ {𝐴}) = ({𝐴} × {𝐴}) | ||
Theorem | iresn0n0 5916 | The identity function restricted to a class 𝐴 is empty iff the class 𝐴 is empty. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jan-2024.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | imaeq1 5917 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | imaeq2 5918 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) = (𝐶 “ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | imaeq1i 5919 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | imaeq2i 5920 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 “ 𝐴) = (𝐶 “ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | imaeq1d 5921 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | imaeq2d 5922 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) = (𝐶 “ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | imaeq12d 5923 | Equality theorem for image. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) = (𝐵 “ 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | dfima2 5924* | Alternate definition of image. Compare definition (d) of [Enderton] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐴𝑦} | ||
Theorem | dfima3 5925* | Alternate definition of image. Compare definition (d) of [Enderton] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴)} | ||
Theorem | elimag 5926* | Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-2007.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥𝐵𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | elima 5927* | Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2004.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥𝐵𝐴) | ||
Theorem | elima2 5928* | Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥𝐵𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | elima3 5929* | Membership in an image. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 “ 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 〈𝑥, 𝐴〉 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | nfima 5930 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for image. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 “ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | nfimad 5931 | Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfima 5930. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 “ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | imadmrn 5932 | The image of the domain of a class is the range of the class. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ (𝐴 “ dom 𝐴) = ran 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | imassrn 5933 | The image of a class is a subset of its range. Theorem 3.16(xi) of [Monk1] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1995.) |
⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ⊆ ran 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | mptima 5934* | Image of a function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = ran (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ↦ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | imai 5935 | Image under the identity relation. Theorem 3.16(viii) of [Monk1] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.) |
⊢ ( I “ 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | rnresi 5936 | The range of the restricted identity function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2004.) |
⊢ ran ( I ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | resiima 5937 | The image of a restriction of the identity function. (Contributed by FL, 31-Dec-2006.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (( I ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | ima0 5938 | Image of the empty set. Theorem 3.16(ii) of [Monk1] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-1998.) |
⊢ (𝐴 “ ∅) = ∅ | ||
Theorem | 0ima 5939 | Image under the empty relation. (Contributed by FL, 11-Jan-2007.) |
⊢ (∅ “ 𝐴) = ∅ | ||
Theorem | csbima12 5940 | Move class substitution in and out of the image of a function. (Contributed by FL, 15-Dec-2006.) (Revised by NM, 20-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) | ||
Theorem | imadisj 5941 | A class whose image under another is empty is disjoint with the other's domain. (Contributed by FL, 24-Jan-2007.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 “ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (dom 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | cnvimass 5942 | A preimage under any class is included in the domain of the class. (Contributed by FL, 29-Jan-2007.) |
⊢ (◡𝐴 “ 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | cnvimarndm 5943 | The preimage of the range of a class is the domain of the class. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Jul-2009.) |
⊢ (◡𝐴 “ ran 𝐴) = dom 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | imasng 5944* | The image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2005.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝑅𝑦}) | ||
Theorem | relimasn 5945* | The image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-1998.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝑅𝑦}) | ||
Theorem | elrelimasn 5946 | Elementhood in the image of a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝑅 “ {𝐴}) ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | elimasn 5947 | Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | elimasng 5948 | Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 21-Oct-2006.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | elimasni 5949 | Membership in an image of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-2010.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 “ {𝐵}) → 𝐵𝐴𝐶) | ||
Theorem | args 5950* | Two ways to express the class of unique-valued arguments of 𝐹, which is the same as the domain of 𝐹 whenever 𝐹 is a function. The left-hand side of the equality is from Definition 10.2 of [Quine] p. 65. Quine uses the notation "arg 𝐹 " for this class (for which we have no separate notation). Observe the resemblance to the alternate definition dffv4 6660 of function value, which is based on the idea in Quine's definition. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2005.) |
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝐹 “ {𝑥}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃!𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦} | ||
Theorem | eliniseg 5951 | Membership in an initial segment. The idiom (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}), meaning {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥𝐴𝐵}, is used to specify an initial segment in (for example) Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | epini 5952 | Any set is equal to its preimage under the converse membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (◡ E “ {𝐴}) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | iniseg 5953* | An idiom that signifies an initial segment of an ordering, used, for example, in Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥𝐴𝐵}) | ||
Theorem | inisegn0 5954 | Nonemptiness of an initial segment in terms of range. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ (◡𝐹 “ {𝐴}) ≠ ∅) | ||
Theorem | dffr3 5955* | Alternate definition of well-founded relation. Definition 6.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑥 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑦})) = ∅)) | ||
Theorem | dfse2 5956* | Alternate definition of set-like relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑥})) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | imass1 5957 | Subset theorem for image. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 “ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | imass2 5958 | Subset theorem for image. Exercise 22(a) of [Enderton] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 “ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 “ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | ndmima 5959 | The image of a singleton outside the domain is empty. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 3-Jul-2020.) |
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 → (𝐵 “ {𝐴}) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | relcnv 5960 | A converse is a relation. Theorem 12 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1996.) |
⊢ Rel ◡𝐴 | ||
Theorem | relbrcnvg 5961 | When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5746 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | eliniseg2 5962 | Eliminate the class existence constraint in eliniseg 5951. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2015.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐶 ∈ (◡𝐴 “ {𝐵}) ↔ 𝐶𝐴𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | relbrcnv 5963 | When 𝑅 is a relation, the sethood assumptions on brcnv 5746 can be omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ Rel 𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cotrg 5964* | Two ways of saying that the composition of two relations is included in a third relation. See its special instance cotr 5965 for the main application. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Generalized from its special instance cotr 5965. (Revised by Richard Penner, 24-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐵𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝐴𝑧) → 𝑥𝐶𝑧)) | ||
Theorem | cotr 5965* | Two ways of saying a relation is transitive. Definition of transitivity in [Schechter] p. 51. Special instance of cotrg 5964. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)) | ||
Theorem | idrefALT 5966* | Alternate proof of idref 6900 not relying on definitions related to functions. Two ways to state that a relation is reflexive on a class. (Contributed by FL, 15-Jan-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) (Revised by NM, 30-Mar-2016.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 28-Aug-2022.) The "proof modification is discouraged" tag is here only because this is an *ALT result. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥) | ||
Theorem | cnvsym 5967* | Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. Similar to definition of symmetry in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | intasym 5968* | Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric. Definition of antisymmetry in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | asymref 5969* | Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive. ∪ ∪ 𝑅 is the field of a relation by relfld 6119. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | asymref2 5970* | Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) = ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ ∪ 𝑅𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | intirr 5971* | Two ways of saying a relation is irreflexive. Definition of irreflexivity in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ I ) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥) | ||
Theorem | brcodir 5972* | Two ways of saying that two elements have an upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | codir 5973* | Two ways of saying a relation is directed. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧(𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) | ||
Theorem | qfto 5974* | A quantifier-free way of expressing the total order predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑅 ∪ ◡𝑅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | xpidtr 5975 | A Cartesian square is a transitive relation. (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | trin2 5976 | The intersection of two transitive classes is transitive. (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.) |
⊢ (((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑆 ∘ 𝑆) ⊆ 𝑆) → ((𝑅 ∩ 𝑆) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | poirr2 5977 | A partial order relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Nov-2015.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 → (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | trinxp 5978 | The relation induced by a transitive relation on a part of its field is transitive. (Taking the intersection of a relation with a Cartesian square is a way to restrict it to a subset of its field.) (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | soirri 5979 | A strict order relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐴 | ||
Theorem | sotri 5980 | A strict order relation is a transitive relation. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
Theorem | son2lpi 5981 | A strict order relation has no 2-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐴) | ||
Theorem | sotri2 5982 | A transitivity relation. (Read 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 and 𝐵 < 𝐶 implies 𝐴 < 𝐶.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
Theorem | sotri3 5983 | A transitivity relation. (Read 𝐴 < 𝐵 and 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 implies 𝐴 < 𝐶.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) |
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝑆 & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝐵) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶) | ||
Theorem | poleloe 5984 | Express "less than or equals" for general strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | poltletr 5985 | Transitive law for general strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | somin1 5986 | Property of a minimum in a strict order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵)(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐴) | ||
Theorem | somincom 5987 | Commutativity of minimum in a total order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝐵𝑅𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | somin2 5988 | Property of a minimum in a strict order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → if(𝐴𝑅𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵)(𝑅 ∪ I )𝐵) | ||
Theorem | soltmin 5989 | Being less than a minimum, for a general total order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝑋 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴𝑅if(𝐵𝑅𝐶, 𝐵, 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | cnvopab 5990* | The converse of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ ◡{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑦, 𝑥〉 ∣ 𝜑} | ||
Theorem | mptcnv 5991* | The converse of a mapping function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | cnv0 5992 | The converse of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 6-Apr-1998.) Remove dependency on ax-sep 5194, ax-nul 5201, ax-pr 5320. (Revised by KP, 25-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ ◡∅ = ∅ | ||
Theorem | cnvi 5993 | The converse of the identity relation. Theorem 3.7(ii) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ ◡ I = I | ||
Theorem | cnvun 5994 | The converse of a union is the union of converses. Theorem 16 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∪ ◡𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cnvdif 5995 | Distributive law for converse over class difference. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∖ ◡𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cnvin 5996 | Distributive law for converse over intersection. Theorem 15 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = (◡𝐴 ∩ ◡𝐵) | ||
Theorem | rnun 5997 | Distributive law for range over union. Theorem 8 of [Suppes] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ ran (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (ran 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | rnin 5998 | The range of an intersection belongs the intersection of ranges. Theorem 9 of [Suppes] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2004.) |
⊢ ran (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (ran 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | rniun 5999 | The range of an indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) |
⊢ ran ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ran 𝐵 | ||
Theorem | rnuni 6000* | The range of a union. Part of Exercise 8 of [Enderton] p. 41. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) |
⊢ ran ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ran 𝑥 |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |