Theorem nfafv 43342

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for function value, analogous to nffv 6683. To prove a deduction version of this analogous to nffvd 6685 is not easily possible because a deduction version of nfdfat 43333 cannot be shown easily. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfafv.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
nfafv.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfafv	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹'''𝐴)

Proof of Theorem nfafv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfafv2 43338	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹'''𝐴) = if(𝐹 defAt 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝐴), V)
2		nfafv.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
3		nfafv.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4	2, 3	nfdfat 43333	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴
5	2, 3	nffv 6683	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝐴)
6		nfcv 2980	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥V
7	4, 5, 6	nfif 4499	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥if(𝐹 defAt 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝐴), V)
8	1, 7	nfcxfr 2978	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹'''𝐴)

Syntax hints:  Ⅎwnfc 2964  Vcvv 3497  ifcif 4470  ‘cfv 6358   defAt wdfat 43322  '''cafv 43323

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2014  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2796  ax-sep 5206  ax-nul 5213  ax-pow 5269  ax-pr 5333

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1539  df-fal 1549  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2621  df-eu 2653  df-clab 2803  df-cleq 2817  df-clel 2896  df-nfc 2966  df-ne 3020  df-ral 3146  df-rex 3147  df-rab 3150  df-v 3499  df-sbc 3776  df-csb 3887  df-dif 3942  df-un 3944  df-in 3946  df-ss 3955  df-nul 4295  df-if 4471  df-sn 4571  df-pr 4573  df-op 4577  df-uni 4842  df-int 4880  df-br 5070  df-opab 5132  df-id 5463  df-xp 5564  df-rel 5565  df-cnv 5566  df-co 5567  df-dm 5568  df-res 5570  df-iota 6317  df-fun 6360  df-fv 6366  df-aiota 43292  df-dfat 43325  df-afv 43326

This theorem is referenced by:  csbafv12g  43343  nfaov  43385