Theorem nfdfat 43333

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for "defined at". To prove a deduction version of this theorem is not easily possible because many deduction versions for bound-variable hypothesis builder for constructs the definition of "defined at" is based on are not available (e.g., for Fun/Rel, dom, ⊆, etc.). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfdfat.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
nfdfat.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfdfat	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴

Proof of Theorem nfdfat

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-dfat 43325	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})))
2		nfdfat.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3		nfdfat.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
4	3	nfdm 5826	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥dom 𝐹
5	2, 4	nfel 2995	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹
6	2	nfsn 4646	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝐴}
7	3, 6	nfres 5858	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})
8	7	nffun 6381	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})
9	5, 8	nfan 1899	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}))
10	1, 9	nfxfr 1852	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 398  Ⅎwnf 1783   ∈ wcel 2113  Ⅎwnfc 2964  {csn 4570  dom cdm 5558   ↾ cres 5560  Fun wfun 6352   defAt wdfat 43322

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2014  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2796

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1539  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2803  df-cleq 2817  df-clel 2896  df-nfc 2966  df-ral 3146  df-rab 3150  df-v 3499  df-dif 3942  df-un 3944  df-in 3946  df-ss 3955  df-nul 4295  df-if 4471  df-sn 4571  df-pr 4573  df-op 4577  df-br 5070  df-opab 5132  df-xp 5564  df-rel 5565  df-cnv 5566  df-co 5567  df-dm 5568  df-res 5570  df-fun 6360  df-dfat 43325

This theorem is referenced by:  nfafv  43342  nfafv2  43424