MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  nfexd2 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem nfexd2 2331
Description: Variation on nfexd 2166 which adds the hypothesis that 𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct in the inner subproof. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
nfald2.1 𝑦𝜑
nfald2.2 ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
Assertion
Ref Expression
nfexd2 (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝑦𝜓)

Proof of Theorem nfexd2
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-ex 1704 . 2 (∃𝑦𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦 ¬ 𝜓)
2 nfald2.1 . . . 4 𝑦𝜑
3 nfald2.2 . . . . 5 ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
43nfnd 1784 . . . 4 ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝜓)
52, 4nfald2 2330 . . 3 (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝑦 ¬ 𝜓)
65nfnd 1784 . 2 (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦 ¬ 𝜓)
71, 6nfxfrd 1779 1 (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝑦𝜓)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wa 384  wal 1480  wex 1703  wnf 1707
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1721  ax-4 1736  ax-5 1838  ax-6 1887  ax-7 1934  ax-10 2018  ax-11 2033  ax-12 2046  ax-13 2245
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1485  df-ex 1704  df-nf 1709
This theorem is referenced by:  nfmod2  2482
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator