Theorem nfwlim 33113

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfwlim.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅
nfwlim.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfwlim	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥WLim(𝑅, 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem nfwlim

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-wlim 33104	. 2 ⊢ WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅))}
2		nfcv 2980	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑦
3		nfwlim.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4		nfwlim.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅
5	3, 3, 4	nfinf 8949	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅)
6	2, 5	nfne 3122	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅)
7	4, 3, 2	nfpred 6156	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)
8	7, 3, 4	nfsup 8918	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅)
9	8	nfeq2 2998	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅)
10	6, 9	nfan 1899	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅))
11	10, 3	nfrabw 3388	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝑦 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑦 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦), 𝐴, 𝑅))}
12	1, 11	nfcxfr 2978	1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥WLim(𝑅, 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1536  Ⅎwnfc 2964   ≠ wne 3019  {crab 3145  Predcpred 6150  supcsup 8907  infcinf 8908  WLimcwlim 33102

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2014  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2796  ax-sep 5206  ax-nul 5213  ax-pr 5333

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1539  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2621  df-eu 2653  df-clab 2803  df-cleq 2817  df-clel 2896  df-nfc 2966  df-ne 3020  df-ral 3146  df-rex 3147  df-rab 3150  df-v 3499  df-dif 3942  df-un 3944  df-in 3946  df-ss 3955  df-nul 4295  df-if 4471  df-sn 4571  df-pr 4573  df-op 4577  df-uni 4842  df-br 5070  df-opab 5132  df-xp 5564  df-cnv 5566  df-dm 5568  df-rn 5569  df-res 5570  df-ima 5571  df-pred 6151  df-sup 8909  df-inf 8910  df-wlim 33104

This theorem is referenced by: (None)