Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > nss | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Negation of subclass relationship. Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nss | ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | exanali 1850 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
2 | dfss2 3952 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
3 | 1, 2 | xchbinxr 336 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) |
4 | 3 | bicomi 225 | 1 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 207 ∧ wa 396 ∀wal 1526 ∃wex 1771 ∈ wcel 2105 ⊆ wss 3933 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1787 ax-4 1801 ax-5 1902 ax-6 1961 ax-7 2006 ax-8 2107 ax-9 2115 ax-10 2136 ax-11 2151 ax-12 2167 ax-ext 2790 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 208 df-an 397 df-or 842 df-tru 1531 df-ex 1772 df-nf 1776 df-sb 2061 df-clab 2797 df-cleq 2811 df-clel 2890 df-in 3940 df-ss 3949 |
This theorem is referenced by: grur1 10230 psslinpr 10441 reclem2pr 10458 mreexexlem2d 16904 prmcyg 18943 filconn 22419 alexsubALTlem4 22586 wilthlem2 25573 shne0i 29152 erdszelem10 32344 fundmpss 32906 ntrneineine1lem 40312 nssrex 41228 nssd 41248 nsssmfmbf 42932 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |