Theorem opabdm 30364

Description: Domain of an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Aug-2017.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opabdm	⊢ (𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → dom 𝑅 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦𝜑})

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑅

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem opabdm

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-dm 5567	. 2 ⊢ dom 𝑅 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦}
2		nfopab1 5137	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
3	2	nfeq2 2997	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
4		nfopab2 5138	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
5	4	nfeq2 2997	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
6		df-br 5069	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
7		eleq2 2903	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}))
8		opabidw 5414	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
9	7, 8	syl6bb 289	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ 𝜑))
10	6, 9	syl5bb 285	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑))
11	5, 10	exbid 2225	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → (∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑))
12	3, 11	abbid 2889	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦𝜑})
13	1, 12	syl5eq 2870	1 ⊢ (𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → dom 𝑅 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦𝜑})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1780   ∈ wcel 2114  {cab 2801  ⟨cop 4575   class class class wbr 5068  {copab 5130  dom cdm 5557

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795  ax-sep 5205  ax-nul 5212  ax-pr 5332

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-rab 3149  df-v 3498  df-dif 3941  df-un 3943  df-in 3945  df-ss 3954  df-nul 4294  df-if 4470  df-sn 4570  df-pr 4572  df-op 4576  df-br 5069  df-opab 5131  df-dm 5567

This theorem is referenced by:  fpwrelmapffslem  30470