Theorem ordelordALT 37592

Description: An element of an ordinal class is ordinal. Proposition 7.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 36. This is an alternate proof of ordelord 5648 using the Axiom of Regularity indirectly through dford2 8378. dford2 is a weaker definition of ordinal number. Given the Axiom of Regularity, it need not be assumed that E Fr 𝐴 because this is inferred by the Axiom of Regularity. ordelordALT 37592 is ordelordALTVD 37949 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ordelordALTVD 37949 using the tools program translate..without..overwriting.cmd and Metamath's minimize command. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordelordALT	⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem ordelordALT

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ordtr 5640	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴)
2	1	adantr 479	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Tr 𝐴)
3		dford2 8378	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)))
4	3	simprbi 478	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
5	4	adantr 479	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
6		3orcomb 1040	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
7	6	2ralbii 2963	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
8	5, 7	sylib 206	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
9		simpr 475	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
10		tratrb 37591	. . 3 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Tr 𝐵)
11	2, 8, 9, 10	syl3anc 1317	. 2 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Tr 𝐵)
12		trss 4683	. . . 4 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))
13	2, 9, 12	sylc 62	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)
14		ssralv2 37582	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)))
15	14	ex 448	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))))
16	13, 13, 5, 15	syl3c 63	. 2 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
17		dford2 8378	. 2 ⊢ (Ord 𝐵 ↔ (Tr 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)))
18	11, 16, 17	sylanbrc 694	1 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 382   ∨ w3o 1029   ∈ wcel 1976  ∀wral 2895   ⊆ wss 3539  Tr wtr 4674  Ord word 5625

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1712  ax-4 1727  ax-5 1826  ax-6 1874  ax-7 1921  ax-8 1978  ax-9 1985  ax-10 2005  ax-11 2020  ax-12 2033  ax-13 2233  ax-ext 2589  ax-sep 4703  ax-nul 4712  ax-pr 4828  ax-un 6825  ax-reg 8358

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 195  df-or 383  df-an 384  df-3or 1031  df-3an 1032  df-tru 1477  df-ex 1695  df-nf 1700  df-sb 1867  df-eu 2461  df-mo 2462  df-clab 2596  df-cleq 2602  df-clel 2605  df-nfc 2739  df-ne 2781  df-ral 2900  df-rex 2901  df-rab 2904  df-v 3174  df-sbc 3402  df-dif 3542  df-un 3544  df-in 3546  df-ss 3553  df-nul 3874  df-if 4036  df-sn 4125  df-pr 4127  df-tp 4129  df-op 4131  df-uni 4367  df-br 4578  df-opab 4638  df-tr 4675  df-eprel 4939  df-po 4949  df-so 4950  df-fr 4987  df-we 4989  df-ord 5629

This theorem is referenced by: (None)