| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Inference eliminating two antecedents. (The proof was shortened by Josh Purinton, 29-Dec-2000.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pm2.61ii.1 | ⊢ (¬ φ → (¬ ψ → χ)) |
| pm2.61ii.2 | ⊢ (φ → χ) |
| pm2.61ii.3 | ⊢ (ψ → χ) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pm2.61ii | ⊢ χ |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pm2.61ii.2 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → χ) | |
| 2 | pm2.61ii.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ φ → (¬ ψ → χ)) | |
| 3 | pm2.61ii.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (ψ → χ) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | pm2.61d2 129 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ φ → χ) |
| 5 | 1, 4 | pm2.61i 126 | 1 ⊢ χ |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 2 → wi 3 |
| This theorem is referenced by: pm2.61iii 132 ecase3 751 hbae 1143 ax17eq 1209 sbequi 1226 sbcom 1256 sbcom2 1332 ax17el 1359 pssnn 4519 axextnd 4923 axunnd 4928 axpowndlem3 4931 axpownd 4933 axregndlem2 4935 axregnd 4936 axinfndlem1 4937 axinfnd 4938 alephadd 7532 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 |