Theorem rabbida3 41409

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabbida3.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
rabbida3.2	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabbida3	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})

Proof of Theorem rabbida3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabbida3.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		rabbida3.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))
3	1, 2	abbid 2889	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)})
4		df-rab 3149	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
5		df-rab 3149	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)}
6	3, 4, 5	3eqtr4g 2883	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537  Ⅎwnf 1784   ∈ wcel 2114  {cab 2801  {crab 3144

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-9 2124  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-rab 3149

This theorem is referenced by:  smflimmpt  43091  smflimsupmpt  43110  smfliminfmpt  43113