![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rabid2f | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabid2f.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabid2f | ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | rabid2f.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
2 | 1 | abeq2f 2930 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
3 | pm4.71 665 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
4 | 3 | albii 1896 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
5 | 2, 4 | bitr4i 267 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) |
6 | df-rab 3059 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
7 | 6 | eqeq2i 2772 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
8 | df-ral 3055 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) | |
9 | 5, 7, 8 | 3bitr4i 292 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 196 ∧ wa 383 ∀wal 1630 = wceq 1632 ∈ wcel 2139 {cab 2746 Ⅎwnfc 2889 ∀wral 3050 {crab 3054 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1871 ax-4 1886 ax-5 1988 ax-6 2054 ax-7 2090 ax-9 2148 ax-10 2168 ax-11 2183 ax-12 2196 ax-13 2391 ax-ext 2740 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 197 df-or 384 df-an 385 df-tru 1635 df-ex 1854 df-nf 1859 df-sb 2047 df-clab 2747 df-cleq 2753 df-clel 2756 df-nfc 2891 df-ral 3055 df-rab 3059 |
This theorem is referenced by: funcnvmptOLD 29776 funcnvmpt 29777 dmmptdf2 39938 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |