| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Subclass law for restricted abstraction. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rabss2 | ⊢ (A ⊆ B → {x ∈ A∣φ} ⊆ {x ∈ B∣φ}) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pm3.45 561 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((x ∈ A → x ∈ B) → ((x ∈ A ⋀ φ) → (x ∈ B ⋀ φ))) | |
| 2 | 1 | 19.20i 990 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀x(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) → ∀x((x ∈ A ⋀ φ) → (x ∈ B ⋀ φ))) |
| 3 | ss2ab 2112 | . . 3 ⊢ ({x∣(x ∈ A ⋀ φ)} ⊆ {x∣(x ∈ B ⋀ φ)} ↔ ∀x((x ∈ A ⋀ φ) → (x ∈ B ⋀ φ))) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | sylibr 200 | . 2 ⊢ (∀x(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) → {x∣(x ∈ A ⋀ φ)} ⊆ {x∣(x ∈ B ⋀ φ)}) |
| 5 | dfss2 2054 | . 2 ⊢ (A ⊆ B ↔ ∀x(x ∈ A → x ∈ B)) | |
| 6 | df-rab 1649 | . . 3 ⊢ {x ∈ A∣φ} = {x∣(x ∈ A ⋀ φ)} | |
| 7 | df-rab 1649 | . . 3 ⊢ {x ∈ B∣φ} = {x∣(x ∈ B ⋀ φ)} | |
| 8 | 6, 7 | sseq12i 2083 | . 2 ⊢ ({x ∈ A∣φ} ⊆ {x ∈ B∣φ} ↔ {x∣(x ∈ A ⋀ φ)} ⊆ {x∣(x ∈ B ⋀ φ)}) |
| 9 | 4, 5, 8 | 3imtr4 219 | 1 ⊢ (A ⊆ B → {x ∈ A∣φ} ⊆ {x ∈ B∣φ}) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 3 ⋀ wa 223 ∀wal 952 ∈ wcel 956 {cab 1461 {crab 1645 ⊆ wss 2043 |
| This theorem is referenced by: shatomistic 10225 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 ax-7 960 ax-gen 961 ax-8 962 ax-10 964 ax-12 966 ax-17 969 ax-4 971 ax-5o 973 ax-6o 976 ax-9o 1121 ax-10o 1138 ax-16 1208 ax-11o 1216 ax-ext 1457 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 df-an 225 df-ex 979 df-sb 1170 df-clab 1462 df-cleq 1467 df-clel 1470 df-rab 1649 df-in 2047 df-ss 2049 |