MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  ralnralall Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem ralnralall 4224
Description: A contradiction concerning restricted generalization for a nonempty set implies anything. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Sep-2018.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
ralnralall (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((∀𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝐴 ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜓))
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ralnralall
StepHypRef Expression
1 r19.26 3202 . 2 (∀𝑥𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) ↔ (∀𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝐴 ¬ 𝜑))
2 pm3.24 962 . . . . 5 ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)
32bifal 1646 . . . 4 ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ⊥)
43ralbii 3118 . . 3 (∀𝑥𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥𝐴 ⊥)
5 r19.3rzv 4208 . . . 4 (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (⊥ ↔ ∀𝑥𝐴 ⊥))
6 falim 1647 . . . 4 (⊥ → 𝜓)
75, 6syl6bir 244 . . 3 (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥𝐴 ⊥ → 𝜓))
84, 7syl5bi 232 . 2 (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜓))
91, 8syl5bir 233 1 (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((∀𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝐴 ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜓))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wa 383  wfal 1637  wne 2932  wral 3050  c0 4058
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1871  ax-4 1886  ax-5 1988  ax-6 2054  ax-7 2090  ax-9 2148  ax-10 2168  ax-11 2183  ax-12 2196  ax-13 2391  ax-ext 2740
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1635  df-fal 1638  df-ex 1854  df-nf 1859  df-sb 2047  df-clab 2747  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2756  df-nfc 2891  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3055  df-v 3342  df-dif 3718  df-nul 4059
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator