Theorem ramsey 16369

Description: Ramsey's theorem with the definition Ramsey eliminated. If 𝑀 is an integer, 𝑅 is a specified finite set of colors, and 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ₀ is a set of lower bounds for each color, then there is an 𝑛 such that for every set 𝑠 of size greater than 𝑛 and every coloring 𝑓 of the set (𝑠𝐶𝑀) of all 𝑀-element subsets of 𝑠, there is a color 𝑐 and a subset 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑠 such that 𝑥 is larger than 𝐹(𝑐) and the 𝑀-element subsets of 𝑥 are monochromatic with color 𝑐. This is the hypergraph version of Ramsey's theorem; the version for simple graphs is the case 𝑀 = 2. This is Metamath 100 proof #31. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ramsey.c	⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ramsey	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐}))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑓,𝑐,𝑛,𝑠,𝑥,𝐹   𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛,𝑠,𝑥,𝑀   𝑅,𝑐,𝑓,𝑛,𝑠,𝑥   𝐶,𝑐,𝑓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐶(𝑖,𝑛,𝑠,𝑎,𝑏)   𝑅(𝑖,𝑎,𝑏)   𝐹(𝑖,𝑎,𝑏)

Proof of Theorem ramsey

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ramcl 16368	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) → (𝑀 Ramsey 𝐹) ∈ ℕ0)
2		ramsey.c	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑎 ∣ (♯‘𝑏) = 𝑖})
3		eqid 2824	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})))} = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})))}
4	2, 3	ramtcl2 16350	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) → ((𝑀 Ramsey 𝐹) ∈ ℕ0 ↔ {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})))} ≠ ∅))
5	1, 4	mpbid 234	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) → {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})))} ≠ ∅)
6		rabn0 4342	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐})))} ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐}))))
7	5, 6	sylib 220	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝑅⟶ℕ0) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑠(𝑛 ≤ (♯‘𝑠) → ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m (𝑠𝐶𝑀))∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑠((𝐹‘𝑐) ≤ (♯‘𝑥) ∧ (𝑥𝐶𝑀) ⊆ (◡𝑓 “ {𝑐}))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   ∧ w3a 1083  ∀wal 1534   = wceq 1536   ∈ wcel 2113   ≠ wne 3019  ∀wral 3141  ∃wrex 3142  {crab 3145  Vcvv 3497   ⊆ wss 3939  ∅c0 4294  𝒫 cpw 4542  {csn 4570   class class class wbr 5069  ^◡ccnv 5557   “ cima 5561  ⟶wf 6354  ‘cfv 6358  (class class class)co 7159   ∈ cmpo 7161   ↑_m cmap 8409  Fincfn 8512   ≤ cle 10679  ℕ₀cn0 11900  ♯chash 13693   Ramsey cram 16338

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2014  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2796  ax-rep 5193  ax-sep 5206  ax-nul 5213  ax-pow 5269  ax-pr 5333  ax-un 7464  ax-inf2 9107  ax-cnex 10596  ax-resscn 10597  ax-1cn 10598  ax-icn 10599  ax-addcl 10600  ax-addrcl 10601  ax-mulcl 10602  ax-mulrcl 10603  ax-mulcom 10604  ax-addass 10605  ax-mulass 10606  ax-distr 10607  ax-i2m1 10608  ax-1ne0 10609  ax-1rid 10610  ax-rnegex 10611  ax-rrecex 10612  ax-cnre 10613  ax-pre-lttri 10614  ax-pre-lttrn 10615  ax-pre-ltadd 10616  ax-pre-mulgt0 10617  ax-pre-sup 10618

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3or 1084  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1539  df-fal 1549  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2621  df-eu 2653  df-clab 2803  df-cleq 2817  df-clel 2896  df-nfc 2966  df-ne 3020  df-nel 3127  df-ral 3146  df-rex 3147  df-reu 3148  df-rmo 3149  df-rab 3150  df-v 3499  df-sbc 3776  df-csb 3887  df-dif 3942  df-un 3944  df-in 3946  df-ss 3955  df-pss 3957  df-nul 4295  df-if 4471  df-pw 4544  df-sn 4571  df-pr 4573  df-tp 4575  df-op 4577  df-uni 4842  df-int 4880  df-iun 4924  df-br 5070  df-opab 5132  df-mpt 5150  df-tr 5176  df-id 5463  df-eprel 5468  df-po 5477  df-so 5478  df-fr 5517  df-se 5518  df-we 5519  df-xp 5564  df-rel 5565  df-cnv 5566  df-co 5567  df-dm 5568  df-rn 5569  df-res 5570  df-ima 5571  df-pred 6151  df-ord 6197  df-on 6198  df-lim 6199  df-suc 6200  df-iota 6317  df-fun 6360  df-fn 6361  df-f 6362  df-f1 6363  df-fo 6364  df-f1o 6365  df-fv 6366  df-isom 6367  df-riota 7117  df-ov 7162  df-oprab 7163  df-mpo 7164  df-om 7584  df-1st 7692  df-2nd 7693  df-wrecs 7950  df-recs 8011  df-rdg 8049  df-1o 8105  df-2o 8106  df-oadd 8109  df-er 8292  df-map 8411  df-en 8513  df-dom 8514  df-sdom 8515  df-fin 8516  df-sup 8909  df-inf 8910  df-oi 8977  df-dju 9333  df-card 9371  df-pnf 10680  df-mnf 10681  df-xr 10682  df-ltxr 10683  df-le 10684  df-sub 10875  df-neg 10876  df-div 11301  df-nn 11642  df-2 11703  df-3 11704  df-n0 11901  df-xnn0 11971  df-z 11985  df-uz 12247  df-rp 12393  df-ico 12747  df-fz 12896  df-fzo 13037  df-seq 13373  df-exp 13433  df-fac 13637  df-bc 13666  df-hash 13694  df-cj 14461  df-re 14462  df-im 14463  df-sqrt 14597  df-abs 14598  df-clim 14848  df-sum 15046  df-ram 16340

This theorem is referenced by: (None)