Theorem rmorabex 5069

Description: Restricted "at most one" existence implies a restricted class abstraction exists. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rmorabex	⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem rmorabex

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		moabex 5068	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V)
2		df-rmo 3050	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
3		df-rab 3051	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
4	3	eleq1i 2822	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V)
5	1, 2, 4	3imtr4i 281	1 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 383   ∈ wcel 2131  ∃*wmo 2600  {cab 2738  ∃*wrmo 3045  {crab 3046  Vcvv 3332

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1863  ax-4 1878  ax-5 1980  ax-6 2046  ax-7 2082  ax-9 2140  ax-10 2160  ax-11 2175  ax-12 2188  ax-13 2383  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 4925  ax-nul 4933  ax-pr 5047

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1627  df-ex 1846  df-nf 1851  df-sb 2039  df-eu 2603  df-mo 2604  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2745  df-clel 2748  df-nfc 2883  df-rmo 3050  df-rab 3051  df-v 3334  df-dif 3710  df-un 3712  df-in 3714  df-ss 3721  df-nul 4051  df-sn 4314  df-pr 4316

This theorem is referenced by:  supexd  8516