Theorem sbcied 3816

Description: Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, deduction form. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sbcied.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
sbcied.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbcied	⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem sbcied

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbcied.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
2		sbcied.2	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3		nfv 1915	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
4		nfvd 1916	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)
5	1, 2, 3, 4	sbciedf 3815	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  [wsbc 3774

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-v 3498  df-sbc 3775

This theorem is referenced by:  sbcied2  3817  sbc2iedv  3853  sbc3ie  3854  sbcralt  3857  euotd  5405  fmptsnd  6933  riota5f  7144  fpwwe2lem12  10065  fpwwe2lem13  10066  brfi1uzind  13859  opfi1uzind  13862  sbcie3s  16543  issubc  17107  gsumvalx  17888  dmdprd  19122  dprdval  19127  issrg  19259  issrng  19623  islmhm  19801  isassa  20090  isphl  20774  istmd  22684  istgp  22687  isnlm  23286  isclm  23670  iscph  23776  iscms  23950  limcfval  24472  ewlksfval  27385  sbcies  30253  abfmpeld  30401  abfmpel  30402  isomnd  30704  isorng  30874