Theorem sbcrexgOLD 39389

Description: Interchange class substitution and restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) Obsolete as of 18-Aug-2018. Use sbcrex 3860 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbcrexgOLD	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑦)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sbcrexgOLD

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfsbcq2 3777	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
2		dfsbcq2 3777	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
3	2	rexbidv 3299	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
4		nfcv 2979	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
5		nfs1v 2160	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑
6	4, 5	nfrex 3311	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑
7		sbequ12 2253	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
8	7	rexbidv 3299	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
9	6, 8	sbie 2544	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
10	1, 3, 9	vtoclbg 3571	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   = wceq 1537  [wsb 2069   ∈ wcel 2114  ∃wrex 3141  [wsbc 3774

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-13 2390  ax-ext 2795

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-ral 3145  df-rex 3146  df-sbc 3775

This theorem is referenced by:  2sbcrexOLD  39390  sbc2rexgOLD  39392