Theorem scutcut 33261

Description: Cut properties of the surreal cut operation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
scutcut	⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem scutcut

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		scutval 33260	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (𝐴 |s 𝐵) = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})))
2		conway 33259	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)}))
3		riotacl 7125	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)}) → (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})
4	2, 3	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})
5	1, 4	eqeltrd 2913	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})
6		sneq 4570	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵) → {𝑦} = {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)})
7	6	breq2d 5070	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵) → (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ↔ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)}))
8	6	breq1d 5068	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵) → ({𝑦} <<s 𝐵 ↔ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵))
9	7, 8	anbi12d 632	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵) → ((𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵)))
10	9	elrab 3679	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ↔ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ (𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵)))
11		3anass 1091	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵) ↔ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ (𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵)))
12	10, 11	bitr4i 280	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ↔ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵))
13	5, 12	sylib 220	1 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   ∧ w3a 1083   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2110  ∃!wreu 3140  {crab 3142  {csn 4560  ∩ cint 4868   class class class wbr 5058   “ cima 5552  ‘cfv 6349  ℩crio 7107  (class class class)co 7150   No csur 33142   bday cbday 33144   <<s csslt 33245   |s cscut 33247

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2793  ax-rep 5182  ax-sep 5195  ax-nul 5202  ax-pow 5258  ax-pr 5321  ax-un 7455

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3or 1084  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2618  df-eu 2650  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-reu 3145  df-rmo 3146  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-sbc 3772  df-csb 3883  df-dif 3938  df-un 3940  df-in 3942  df-ss 3951  df-pss 3953  df-nul 4291  df-if 4467  df-pw 4540  df-sn 4561  df-pr 4563  df-tp 4565  df-op 4567  df-uni 4832  df-int 4869  df-iun 4913  df-br 5059  df-opab 5121  df-mpt 5139  df-tr 5165  df-id 5454  df-eprel 5459  df-po 5468  df-so 5469  df-fr 5508  df-we 5510  df-xp 5555  df-rel 5556  df-cnv 5557  df-co 5558  df-dm 5559  df-rn 5560  df-res 5561  df-ima 5562  df-ord 6188  df-on 6189  df-suc 6191  df-iota 6308  df-fun 6351  df-fn 6352  df-f 6353  df-f1 6354  df-fo 6355  df-f1o 6356  df-fv 6357  df-riota 7108  df-ov 7153  df-oprab 7154  df-mpo 7155  df-1o 8096  df-2o 8097  df-no 33145  df-slt 33146  df-bday 33147  df-sslt 33246  df-scut 33248

This theorem is referenced by:  scutbday  33262  scutun12  33266  scutf  33268  slerec  33272  sltrec  33273  madeval2  33285