Theorem sspwimpcfVD 41262

Description: The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 40910) using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. It was completed automatically by a tools program which would invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sspwimpcf 41261 is sspwimpcfVD 41262 without virtual deductions and was derived from sspwimpcfVD 41262. The version of completeusersproof.cmd used is capable of only generating conjunction-form unification theorems, not unification deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   )
2::	⊢ (   ........... 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴    ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )
3:2:	⊢ (   ........... 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴    ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴   )
4:3,1:	⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵   )
5::	⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
6:4,5:	⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵    )
7:6:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)    )
8:7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)   )
9:8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵   )
qed:9:	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sspwimpcfVD	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem sspwimpcfVD

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3499	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
2		idn1 40915	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   )
3		idn1 40915	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )
4		elpwi 4550	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
5	3, 4	el1 40969	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴   )
6		sstr2 3976	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
7	6	impcom 410	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)
8	2, 5, 7	el12 41067	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵   )
9		elpwg 4544	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
10	9	biimpar 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
11	1, 8, 10	el021old 41042	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵   )
12	11	int2 40947	. . . 4 ⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)   )
13	12	gen11 40957	. . 3 ⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)   )
14		dfss2 3957	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵))
15	14	biimpri 230	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
16	13, 15	el1 40969	. 2 ⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵   )
17	16	in1 40912	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1535   ∈ wcel 2114  Vcvv 3496   ⊆ wss 3938  𝒫 cpw 4541

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-v 3498  df-in 3945  df-ss 3954  df-pw 4543  df-vd1 40911  df-vhc2 40922

This theorem is referenced by: (None)