Theorem suc11 6288

Description: The successor operation behaves like a one-to-one function. Compare Exercise 16 of [Enderton] p. 194. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suc11	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem suc11

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eloni 6195	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → Ord 𝐴)
2		ordn2lp 6205	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
3		pm3.13 991	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
4	1, 2, 3	3syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
5	4	adantr 483	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
6		eqimss 4022	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵)
7		sucssel 6277	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (suc 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
8	6, 7	syl5 34	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
9		elsuci 6251	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
10	9	ord 860	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
11	10	com12 32	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
12	8, 11	syl9 77	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
13		eqimss2 4023	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → suc 𝐵 ⊆ suc 𝐴)
14		sucssel 6277	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (suc 𝐵 ⊆ suc 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
15	13, 14	syl5 34	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
16		elsuci 6251	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴))
17	16	ord 860	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐴))
18		eqcom 2828	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
19	17, 18	syl6ib 253	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
20	19	com12 32	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
21	15, 20	syl9 77	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
22	12, 21	jaao 951	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
23	5, 22	mpd 15	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
24		suceq 6250	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵)
25	23, 24	impbid1 227	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   ∨ wo 843   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2110   ⊆ wss 3935  Ord word 6184  Oncon0 6185  suc csuc 6187

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2793  ax-sep 5195  ax-nul 5202  ax-pr 5321

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2618  df-eu 2650  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-sbc 3772  df-dif 3938  df-un 3940  df-in 3942  df-ss 3951  df-nul 4291  df-if 4467  df-sn 4561  df-pr 4563  df-op 4567  df-uni 4832  df-br 5059  df-opab 5121  df-tr 5165  df-eprel 5459  df-po 5468  df-so 5469  df-fr 5508  df-we 5510  df-ord 6188  df-on 6189  df-suc 6191

This theorem is referenced by:  peano4  7598  limenpsi  8686  fin1a2lem2  9817  bnj168  31995  sltval2  33158  sltsolem1  33175  nosepnelem  33179  nolt02o  33194  onsuct0  33784  1oequni2o  34643