Theorem tz9.1 8466

Description: Every set has a transitive closure (the smallest transitive extension). Theorem 9.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 73. See trcl 8465 for an explicit expression for the transitive closure. Apparently open problems are whether this theorem can be proved without the Axiom of Infinity; if not, then whether it implies Infinity; and if not, what is the "property" that Infinity has that the other axioms don't have that is weaker than Infinity itself?

(Added 22-Mar-2011) The following article seems to answer the first question, that it can't be proved without Infinity, in the affirmative: Mancini, Antonella and Zambella, Domenico (2001). "A note on recursive models of set theories." Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 42(2):109-115. (Thanks to Scott Fenton.) (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tz9.1.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tz9.1	⊢ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦

Proof of Theorem tz9.1

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tz9.1.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2		eqid 2610	. . 3 ⊢ (rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω) = (rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)
3		eqid 2610	. . 3 ⊢ ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧)
4	1, 2, 3	trcl 8465	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ∧ Tr ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ⊆ 𝑦))
5		omex 8401	. . . 4 ⊢ ω ∈ V
6		fvex 6098	. . . 4 ⊢ ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ∈ V
7	5, 6	iunex 7017	. . 3 ⊢ ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ∈ V
8		sseq2 3590	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧)))
9		treq 4681	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) → (Tr 𝑥 ↔ Tr ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧)))
10		sseq1 3589	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ⊆ 𝑦))
11	10	imbi2d 329	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) → (((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) ↔ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ⊆ 𝑦)))
12	11	albidv 1836	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) → (∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ⊆ 𝑦)))
13	8, 9, 12	3anbi123d 1391	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)) ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ∧ Tr ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ⊆ 𝑦))))
14	7, 13	spcev 3273	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ∧ Tr ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ⊆ 𝑦)) → ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)))
15	4, 14	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 383   ∧ w3a 1031  ∀wal 1473   = wceq 1475  ∃wex 1695   ∈ wcel 1977  Vcvv 3173   ∪ cun 3538   ⊆ wss 3540  ∪ cuni 4367  ∪ ciun 4450   ↦ cmpt 4638  Tr wtr 4675   ↾ cres 5030  ‘cfv 5790  ωcom 6935  reccrdg 7370

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-8 1979  ax-9 1986  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590  ax-rep 4694  ax-sep 4704  ax-nul 4712  ax-pow 4764  ax-pr 4828  ax-un 6825  ax-inf2 8399

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3or 1032  df-3an 1033  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-eu 2462  df-mo 2463  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-ne 2782  df-ral 2901  df-rex 2902  df-reu 2903  df-rab 2905  df-v 3175  df-sbc 3403  df-csb 3500  df-dif 3543  df-un 3545  df-in 3547  df-ss 3554  df-pss 3556  df-nul 3875  df-if 4037  df-pw 4110  df-sn 4126  df-pr 4128  df-tp 4130  df-op 4132  df-uni 4368  df-iun 4452  df-br 4579  df-opab 4639  df-mpt 4640  df-tr 4676  df-eprel 4939  df-id 4943  df-po 4949  df-so 4950  df-fr 4987  df-we 4989  df-xp 5034  df-rel 5035  df-cnv 5036  df-co 5037  df-dm 5038  df-rn 5039  df-res 5040  df-ima 5041  df-pred 5583  df-ord 5629  df-on 5630  df-lim 5631  df-suc 5632  df-iota 5754  df-fun 5792  df-fn 5793  df-f 5794  df-f1 5795  df-fo 5796  df-f1o 5797  df-fv 5798  df-om 6936  df-wrecs 7272  df-recs 7333  df-rdg 7371

This theorem is referenced by:  epfrs  8468