Theorem wwlksnon 27631

Description: The set of walks of a fixed length between two vertices as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-May-2021.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
wwlksnon.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wwlksnon	⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐺,𝑎,𝑏,𝑤   𝑁,𝑎,𝑏,𝑤   𝑉,𝑎,𝑏

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑈(𝑤,𝑎,𝑏)   𝑉(𝑤)

Proof of Theorem wwlksnon

Dummy variables 𝑔 𝑛 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-wwlksnon 27612	. . 3 ⊢ WWalksNOn = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)}))
2	1	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → WWalksNOn = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)})))
3		fveq2 6672	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (Vtx‘𝑔) = (Vtx‘𝐺))
4		wwlksnon.v	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
5	3, 4	syl6eqr 2876	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (Vtx‘𝑔) = 𝑉)
6	5	adantl 484	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (Vtx‘𝑔) = 𝑉)
7		oveq12 7167	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) = (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺))
8		fveqeq2 6681	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → ((𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏 ↔ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏))
9	8	anbi2d 630	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → (((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏) ↔ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)))
10	9	adantr 483	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏) ↔ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)))
11	7, 10	rabeqbidv 3487	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)} = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)})
12	6, 6, 11	mpoeq123dv 7231	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺) → (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)}) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}))
13	12	adantl 484	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑛 = 𝑁 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺)) → (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)}) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}))
14		simpl 485	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)
15		elex 3514	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑈 → 𝐺 ∈ V)
16	15	adantl 484	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝐺 ∈ V)
17	4	fvexi 6686	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 ∈ V
18	17, 17	mpoex 7779	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}) ∈ V
19	18	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}) ∈ V)
20	2, 13, 14, 16, 19	ovmpod 7304	1 ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  {crab 3144  Vcvv 3496  ‘cfv 6357  (class class class)co 7158   ∈ cmpo 7160  0cc0 10539  ℕ₀cn0 11900  Vtxcvtx 26783   WWalksN cwwlksn 27606   WWalksNOn cwwlksnon 27607

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795  ax-rep 5192  ax-sep 5205  ax-nul 5212  ax-pow 5268  ax-pr 5332  ax-un 7463

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-ne 3019  df-ral 3145  df-rex 3146  df-reu 3147  df-rab 3149  df-v 3498  df-sbc 3775  df-csb 3886  df-dif 3941  df-un 3943  df-in 3945  df-ss 3954  df-nul 4294  df-if 4470  df-pw 4543  df-sn 4570  df-pr 4572  df-op 4576  df-uni 4841  df-iun 4923  df-br 5069  df-opab 5131  df-mpt 5149  df-id 5462  df-xp 5563  df-rel 5564  df-cnv 5565  df-co 5566  df-dm 5567  df-rn 5568  df-res 5569  df-ima 5570  df-iota 6316  df-fun 6359  df-fn 6360  df-f 6361  df-f1 6362  df-fo 6363  df-f1o 6364  df-fv 6365  df-ov 7161  df-oprab 7162  df-mpo 7163  df-1st 7691  df-2nd 7692  df-wwlksnon 27612

This theorem is referenced by:  iswwlksnon  27633  wwlksnon0  27634